Re: making a book with LilyPond

2009-08-30 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
Hello Frederico, you can use \bookpart : \book { \bookpart{ \tocItem ... \header { title = ... } } \bookpart{ \tocItem ... \header { title = ... } } } If you surround every piece with a bookpart-statement, you dont need to p

Re: linking render frames in Scribus

2009-08-30 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
If you want multiple page PDFs in Scribus, you can do so. You only need as many image frames as the number of pages in the PDF, then put the same PDF into the image frames, and set the "Page" attribute of the image. With "Render frames" you lose syntax highlight, sytnax checking etc., so for l

Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals

2009-08-30 Thread David Rogers
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 21:14, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > On Saturday 29 August 2009, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >> David, >> >> > The key signature is and has been for many centuries >> > an integral part of the notation. >> >> Yes... and now you're suggesting we make it *not* integral — your >> a

Re: chord durations

2009-08-30 Thread James E. Bailey
On 31.08.2009, at 05:51, Federico Bruni wrote: Christian Henning wrote: Hi there, adding a dot to a chord duration prolongs it by 50%. "g4.", for instance, is 1.5 beats or three 8th notes. "g4.." is 1.75 beats, I believe. Which would translate into seven 16th notes. But what is "g4..."? Her

Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals

2009-08-30 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Saturday 29 August 2009, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > David, > > > The key signature is and has been for many centuries > > an integral part of the notation. > > Yes... and now you're suggesting we make it *not* integral — your > argument holds no merit. No. I'm stating outright that you make

Re: chord durations

2009-08-30 Thread Federico Bruni
Christian Henning wrote: Hi there, adding a dot to a chord duration prolongs it by 50%. "g4.", for instance, is 1.5 beats or three 8th notes. "g4.." is 1.75 beats, I believe. Which would translate into seven 16th notes. But what is "g4..."? Here, with 3 dots. g4... = 15/32 so 1,875 beats Als

chord durations

2009-08-30 Thread Christian Henning
Hi there, adding a dot to a chord duration prolongs it by 50%. "g4.", for instance, is 1.5 beats or three 8th notes. "g4.." is 1.75 beats, I believe. Which would translate into seven 16th notes. But what is "g4..."? Here, with 3 dots. Also, how can I describe a duration that lasts for 2.25 beats?

Re: linking render frames in Scribus

2009-08-30 Thread Pierre Couderc
Federico Bruni a écrit : M Watts wrote: On 08/29/2009 09:47 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: Anybody of you has tried using Scribus 1.3.5 to render LilyPond files? See here: http://docs.scribus.net/index.php?lang=en&page=renderframes If the score is one page only, it works fine. But if it's 2 pages o

Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 81, Issue 135

2009-08-30 Thread Frederick Dennis
Dear Kieren, I think I've sorted it out. > > > On one system, the piano staves are ridiculously far > > apart. How do you bring them closer together? > > Have you looked at the documentation on vertical spacing, particularly >

Re: linking render frames in Scribus

2009-08-30 Thread Federico Bruni
M Watts wrote: On 08/29/2009 09:47 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: Anybody of you has tried using Scribus 1.3.5 to render LilyPond files? See here: http://docs.scribus.net/index.php?lang=en&page=renderframes If the score is one page only, it works fine. But if it's 2 pages or more, I could not find a

Re: linking render frames in Scribus

2009-08-30 Thread M Watts
On 08/29/2009 09:47 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: Anybody of you has tried using Scribus 1.3.5 to render LilyPond files? See here: http://docs.scribus.net/index.php?lang=en&page=renderframes If the score is one page only, it works fine. But if it's 2 pages or more, I could not find any way to spread

Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals

2009-08-30 Thread Kieren MacMillan
You can either choose to learn that rule or you can write an extension to make LilyPond do it another way. A sed script to do it was almost trivial, even for me. So then why not (re)write it in Scheme and contribute the function/ tip to the Lilypond community, so that others could benefit

Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals

2009-08-30 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Sunday 30 August 2009, David Bobroff wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 04:13:56PM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > >> But in this instance, the majority of coders line up in opposition. > >> You have shouted down the users, but convinced none. Why? Because > >> y

Re: odd tempo definition

2009-08-30 Thread James E. Bailey
On 30.08.2009, at 18:02, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi James, Is it possible to get a tempo definition like \tempo 8*5 = 100? Do you want it displayed somehow, or simply defined? If the latter, simply say \tempo 8 = 500. If the former, you'll need to be more specific about how you want the

Re: Change distance between piano staves for one system only

2009-08-30 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Frederick, On one system, the piano staves are ridiculously far apart. How do you bring them closer together? Have you looked at the documentation on vertical spacing, particularly

Re: Change distance between piano staves for one system only

2009-08-30 Thread Frederick Dennis
> > Am Samstag, 29. August 2009 schrieb Frederick Dennis: > > Dear All, > > \version "2.12.2" > > I'm typesetting a 6-stave piece, SATB and piano. > > Is there any way of altering the distance between the > > piano staves, just for one system. Also, is there any > > way to put more distance between

Re: chord duration

2009-08-30 Thread Frederick Dennis
Dear Christian, I checked out your code and all you have to do is add a dot after the g2 to give the value of a dotted minim (half-note). Thanks for the code, as I've never used \improvisationOn. Yrs, Fred. > Hi there, another problem. I hope people don't get too impatient with > me. I try to fig

Re: odd tempo definition

2009-08-30 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi James, Is it possible to get a tempo definition like \tempo 8*5 = 100? Do you want it displayed somehow, or simply defined? If the latter, simply say \tempo 8 = 500. If the former, you'll need to be more specific about how you want the display (e.g., with notes in markup, or whatever).

odd tempo definition

2009-08-30 Thread James E. Bailey
Is it possible to get a tempo definition like \tempo 8*5 = 100? James E. Bailey ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals

2009-08-30 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi David, Likewise if you use TeX, or a high-dollar word processor, and you type "there" the program isn't going to know if you should have typed "their" or "they're". Perfect analogy! I was looking for one, but couldn't come up with it — kudos! Regards, Kieren. __

Re: reflect a character

2009-08-30 Thread James E. Bailey
On 30.08.2009, at 11:17, Mark Knoop wrote: At 21:35 on 29 Aug 2009, James E. Bailey wrote: I can rotate a character with the \rotate command, but is there a way to get a mirror of a character, either horizontal or vertical? to print, for example ə? "ə" _is_ a rotation of 180°, not a reflecti

making a book with LilyPond

2009-08-30 Thread Federico Bruni
I'm trying to compile a number of scores in a book using just LilyPond (I've tried lilypond-book before, but I had some trouble with layout and as I'm not confident with LaTeX I dropped it). I need a help to start in the right way. What I want to print: * table of content * scores (let's say 2

Re: reflect a character

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Knoop
At 21:35 on 29 Aug 2009, James E. Bailey wrote: > I can rotate a character with the \rotate command, but is there a > way to get a mirror of a character, either horizontal or vertical? > to print, for example ə? "ə" _is_ a rotation of 180°, not a reflection. And why can't you just enter "ə"? --

Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals

2009-08-30 Thread David Bobroff
Graham Percival wrote: On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 04:13:56PM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: But in this instance, the majority of coders line up in opposition. You have shouted down the users, but convinced none. Why? Because you are wrong. We don't care. We don't have to. We're the telepho