On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 17:56, Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Tim McNamara wrote:
>>
>> I am a guitarist.
>>
>> If all he wants is a chord chart, some paper and a pencil would be a
>> better approach. Or even a word processor two write out the chords like
>> Ralph Patt did with the Vanilla Book.
>>
>> htt
Dear Pierre,
I noticed that your lyrics (De- us in ad- iu- tó- ri- um me- um in- ten-
de.)
didn't have the hyphen in the right place.
Shouldn't they be: De -- us in ad -- iu -- to -- ri -- um etc.?
Then the syllables get spaced out nicely.
I can't help you on the other problem.
Yours, Fred.
__
Tim McNamara wrote:
I am a guitarist.
If all he wants is a chord chart, some paper and a pencil would be a
better approach. Or even a word processor two write out the chords
like Ralph Patt did with the Vanilla Book.
http://www.ralphpatt.com/VBook.html
Christian's trying to do something Li
On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
Tim McNamara wrote:
On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:30 PM, Christian Henning wrote:
Am I right, that lilypond is rarely used for my type of notation?
Meaning rock/pop tunes for acoustic guitar.
No, the style of music makes no difference. But LilyPond
Tim McNamara wrote:
On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:30 PM, Christian Henning wrote:
Am I right, that lilypond is rarely used for my type of notation?
Meaning rock/pop tunes for acoustic guitar.
No, the style of music makes no difference. But LilyPond is intended
for engraving music which is fundament
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> I can't get it working if in the scores there are some \include.
> The error messages says there's a synthax error in the included file (even
> english.ly!?).
Thats because in file2 you're including english.ly, that contains
toplevel expres
What is the best way for a book with Lilypond extracts in it?
I have tried LaTeX with lilypond book, but I get mixs of lilyponds
'images" with other images.
What am I missing?
Is Scribus an alternative : I see here that there are problems too? Ooffice?
Thank you in advance,
Pierre Couderc
-
On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:30 PM, Christian Henning wrote:
Am I right, that lilypond is rarely used for my type of notation?
Meaning rock/pop tunes for acoustic guitar.
No, the style of music makes no difference. But LilyPond is intended
for engraving music which is fundamentally based upon note
Mats Bengtsson wrote Wednesday, September 02, 2009 1:38 PM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Does this not work when inserted immediately before
the first full bar on the line? (I haven't actually
tried it)
\once \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t #t
#t)
Why not write it as
\once \o
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Does this not work when inserted immediately before
the first full bar on the line? (I haven't actually
tried it)
\once \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t #t #t)
Why not write it as
\once \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #all-visible
Of
Dan Eble wrote Tuesday, September 01, 2009 12:33 AM
I would like Lilypond to print one bar number per system, except
the first. The
default behavior appears to be to print one bar number per system,
except the
first, for systems that begin at a measure break. Systems that
begin in
mid-meas
Franz Schmid has fixed this bug in the Scribus SVN trunk, so will be
included in the 1.3.6 release.
Bert
Federico Bruni wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
http://bugs.scribus.net/view.php?id=8400
thanks
while waiting for the patch that fixes this bug,
I finally managed to make a
Christian Henning wrote Wednesday, September 02, 2009 3:30 AM
Cool, that worked. Though, in essence, I need to use the
ChordNames.chordChanges variable to surpress repeated chords. I
wonder
where the current documentation mention this? googling for
"chordchanges" brings me to lilypond 2.9 do
> -Original Message-
> From: lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael David Crawford
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 September 2009 1:39 AM
> Cc: lilypond
> Subject: Re: Lilypond Speed
>
> It
Frédéric Bron wrote Wednesday, September 02, 2009 6:18 AM
Your remark is interesting! The doc says if they are some rules
defined in auto-beam.scm, you MUST use #(override and #(revert...
But only when the beam durations are the same. This is stated,
maybe
not very clearly, where I've indi
15 matches
Mail list logo