Given the distance in the index between page and
print-first-page-number I'd like to suggest changing the text in
notation\spacing.itely starting at line 645 from:
@item print-first-page-number
@funindex print-first-page-number
If set to true, a page number is printed on the first page.
Default:
У пн, 2010-02-01 у 04:45 +, Graham Percival пише:
> At the moment, the best I can come up with is the generic "Bug
> Team". Suggestions appreciated.
My english is pretty poor... and "i can easily miss and/or mess
anything" (c), but... =:O)
How about "insectors"? Like misspelled "inspectors" b
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Michael Kappler wrote:
I'm also still very interested if there are possibilities to increase
LilyPond performance further.
My machine is very slow, though and I cannot speak for many people when
raising performance issues.
Would it be an idea to create a "Lilypond Benchma
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Michael Kappler wrote:
I'm also still very interested if there are possibilities to increase
LilyPond performance further.
My machine is very slow, though and I cannot speak for many people
when raising performance issues.
Would it be an idea t
Mats Bengtsson wrote Monday, February 01, 2010 11:52 AM
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Michael Kappler wrote:
I'm also still very interested if there are possibilities to
increase LilyPond performance further.
My machine is very slow, though and I cannot speak for many
people
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:37:42PM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Mats Bengtsson wrote Monday, February 01, 2010 11:52 AM
>>
>> Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Michael Kappler wrote:
>>>
I'm also still very interested if there are possibilities to
increase LilyPon
This concoction of mine might be of interest to some:
http://www.sidorefa.com/sib2ly/
To my best knowledge, this tool is substantially more powerful
than other existing Sib->Ly converters.
You are welcome to try it out.
The whole thing is absolutely free and open source, naturally.
Written as a
This concoction of mine might be of interest to some:
http://www.sidorefa.com/sib2ly/
To my best knowledge, this tool is substantially more powerful
than other existing Sib->Ly converters.
You are welcome to try it out.
The whole thing is absolutely free and open source, naturally.
Written
Hi,
Very interesting tool!
is there any way to use it on Mac?
The first step (the sib plugin) works already well.
~Ewald
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Please stop spamming. We saw your first email.
- Graham
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:01:55PM -0800, Kirill Sidorov wrote:
>
> This concoction of mine might be of interest to some:
>
> http://www.sidorefa.com/sib2ly/
>
> To my best knowledge, this tool is substantially more powerful
> than ot
Why are you posting the same message so many times with different subject
headings? I'm very pleased to hear about this tool, but this is very poor
etiquette.
Jon
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Kirill Sidorov wrote:
>
> There has been some progress, gentlemen.
>
> This concoction of mine migh
Ewald Gutenkunst writes:
> Very interesting tool!
> is there any way to use it on Mac?
> The first step (the sib plugin) works already well.
It's written in ruby, so...
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
Kirill writes:
> This new tool I wrote might be of interest to some:
>
> http://www.sidorefa.com/sib2ly/
Must I conclude that this, too, requires Sibelius 6 or higher?
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
Hi all,
I apologise for multiple posting this morning.
I replied to earlier threads where Sib->Ly conversion was discussed,
without realising it was going straight to the mailing-list to annoy everyone.
Sorry!!
Best,
Kirill Sidorov
___
lilypond-u
Ewald Gutenkunst web.de> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Very interesting tool!
> is there any way to use it on Mac?
> The first step (the sib plugin) works already well.
>
> ~Ewald
>
Yes, it should work on all platforms provided you have a Ruby interpreter.
I will update the instructions shortly.
_
Johan Vromans squirrel.nl> writes:
>
> Kirill yandex.ru> writes:
>
> > This new tool I wrote might be of interest to some:
> >
> > http://www.sidorefa.com/sib2ly/
>
> Must I conclude that this, too, requires Sibelius 6 or higher?
>
I have no way of testing if it works for Sibelius earlier
Hello,
today is not my day. Since several hours I try to solve a problem in a
score, but I don't find my fault or the right syntax. I always get the
warning:
test3.ly:18:26: Warnung: Taktüberprüfung gescheitert bei: -1/16
s2 a4. s8
| % 1
The condensed sc
Thanks for the report. I've fixed this in git.
Look at the docs in webgit first, and glance at the contributor's
guide.
What are git and webgit? Where should I have learned that?
Thanks
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
htt
Hajo Dezelski writes:
> Hello,
>
> today is not my day. Since several hours I try to solve a problem in a
> score, but I don't find my fault or the right syntax. I always get the
> warning:
>
> test3.ly:18:26: Warnung: Taktüberprüfung gescheitert bei: -1/16
> s2 a4. s8
>
On 1 Feb 2010, at 15:06, Johan Vromans wrote:
Ewald Gutenkunst writes:
Very interesting tool!
is there any way to use it on Mac?
The first step (the sib plugin) works already well.
It's written in ruby, so...
Ruby is a part of later Mac OS X; on 10.5.8:
$ which ruby
/usr/bin/ruby
$
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Patrick Karl wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the report. I've fixed this in git.
> Look at the docs in webgit first, and glance at the contributor's guide.
>
> What are git and webgit? Where should I have learned that?
http://lilypond.org/~graham/website/development.htm
Hi all,
I don't know if this is a stupid request, but I did some research and as far
as I know Lilypond don't have the Double Treble Clef neither the alternative
percussion clef that both Finale and Sibelius have.
If you guys don't know what I mean, they both can be seen here:
Double Treble Clef:
On 01.02.2010, at 17:40, Caio Barros wrote:
Hi all,
I don't know if this is a stupid request, but I did some research
and as far as I know Lilypond don't have the Double Treble Clef
neither the alternative percussion clef that both Finale and
Sibelius have.
If you guys don't know what I
Hi Caio,
> as far as I know Lilypond don't have the Double Treble Clef
You can always roll your own:
\version "2.13.11"
doubleClef = {
\override Staff.Clef #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\override Staff.Clef #'text = \markup \concat { \musicglyph #"clefs.G"
\translate #'(-1 . 0) \mu
On 01.02.2010, at 16:06, Hajo Dezelski wrote:
Hello,
today is not my day. Since several hours I try to solve a problem in a
score, but I don't find my fault or the right syntax. I always get the
warning:
test3.ly:18:26: Warnung: Taktüberprüfung gescheitert bei: -1/16
s2 a4. s8
Hello,
thanks for your hint.
Removing the bar helped "nothing", the warning still exists.
"nothing"= Of course the score looks right, but when I publish score
in Mutopia, I try to provide a Lilypond Sourcescore which compiles
without warnings and errors. Otherwise people may think that ...
@Davi
Hi Hajo,
This is why I always recommend that you *don't* put \partial and \repeat in
every voice...
Try the attached instead.
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
\version "2.13.10"
global = {
\clef treble
\key d \minor
\time 4/4
\repeat "volta" 2 {
\partial 16 s16
s2...
}
\repeat "vol
Ewald Gutenkunst web.de> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Very interesting tool!
> is there any way to use it on Mac?
> The first step (the sib plugin) works already well.
>
> ~Ewald
>
I have uploaded the SIB2LY suite in form of Ruby scripts.
These should be useable on any platform that is capable of ru
Hello Kieren,
this helped indeed. Thanks! But I dont understand how you did it. Did
you put a second melody before (underneath )? And if the MelodyOne has
254 Bars, do I have to write:
> \repeat "volta" 2 {
>\partial 16 s16
>s255...
> }
> \repeat "volta" 2 {
>\partial 16 s16
>s
After looking at my own trials:
Before the example which I sent to the list I also tried:
\context Staff << { \clef treble \key d \minor \time 4/4 \partial 16
\melody } >>
without declaring \partial in the voices. But that provided the same warning.
Anyway: subtile changes provide sometimes
Hi Hajo,
> Did you put a second melody before (underneath )?
Sorry: I don't understand this question.
> And if the MelodyOne has 254 Bars, do I have to write:
If you only need multiple voices for one small bit (e.g., a single note), then
write them "inline", instead of splitting the voices for
Hello Kieren,
now I got it. Never thought about this possibilty. Thanks again.
Problem solved. We can move on.
Hajo
---
... indessen wandelt harmlos droben das Gestirn
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Hajo,
>
>> Did you put a second melody before (underneath )?
>
I have noticed a resource problem in LilyPond, namely invocation of
the "Compile/Typeset file" command in interactive mode always
consumes one more pid. When I enter music, I incrementally compile
it as I go. I do my work on a Mac running OS 10.4. There are a
fixed number of pids availab
Patrick,
Excuse my ignorance but what is 'interactive mode' in this context?
I use Mac OS X 10.5.8 with Lilypond 2.13.10 and the inbuilt Lilypond editor,
and I cmd-s, cmd-r my way through a piece from scratch so that can be hundreds
of these commands run concurrently in one session. I checked i
On 01.02.2010, at 21:27, Patrick Karl wrote:
I have noticed a resource problem in LilyPond, namely invocation of
the "Compile/Typeset file" command in interactive mode always
consumes one more pid. When I enter music, I incrementally compile
it as I go. I do my work on a Mac running OS 1
On 01.02.2010, at 21:27, Patrick Karl wrote:
I have noticed a resource problem in LilyPond, namely invocation of
the "Compile/Typeset file" command in interactive mode always
consumes one more pid. When I enter music, I incrementally compile
it as I go. I do my work on a Mac running OS 1
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:36:46PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
>
> On 01.02.2010, at 21:27, Patrick Karl wrote:
>
>> When I enter music, I incrementally compile it as I go.
>> I do my work on a Mac running OS 10.4. There are a fixed number of
>> pids available for all the programs running on the
On 31 January 2010 20:01, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> You can write your own engraver that listens to the note-event rather than the
> created NoteHead grobs. There, you can easily extract the pitch...
Of course! Though there's still the problem of how to funnel the
pitch information to a title
Kirill writes:
> > Must I conclude that this, too, requires Sibelius 6 or higher?
>
> I have no way of testing if it works for Sibelius earlier than 5.
> However, I see no reason why it shouldn't work with Sibelius 5.
> I have only tested it with Sibelius 6, though.
>
> Try running the dump plu
I have been having a discussion with a small publisher who uses the
music manuscript program called Score. He says that neither Lilypond or
Finale can produce engraving that is comparable to Score. And that most
of the major music publishers in the world use Score.
Is anyone familiar with Sc
I sent this response earlier to James Lowe privately for unknown
reasons. It illustrates more completely what I'm talking about.
A little more looking around on my Mac shows:
sully:/etc pat$ sysctl -a | grep proc
kern.maxproc = 532
kern.maxfilesperproc = 10240
kern.maxprocperuid = 100
kern.a
On 2/1/2010 9:57 PM, Bobber wrote:
I have been having a discussion with a small publisher who uses the
music manuscript program called Score. He says that neither Lilypond
or Finale can produce engraving that is comparable to Score. And that
most of the major music publishers in the world use
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Bobber wrote:
> I have been having a discussion with a small publisher who uses the music
> manuscript program called Score. He says that neither Lilypond or Finale
> can produce engraving that is comparable to Score. And that most of the
> major music publishers
Thank you, it did help!
Only thing missing is that this is a transposing clef of one octave lower
but this is easy to do.
2010/2/1 Kieren MacMillan
> Hi Caio,
>
> > as far as I know Lilypond don't have the Double Treble Clef
>
> You can always roll your own:
>
> \version "2.13.11"
>
> doubleCle
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:40:11PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> >> When I enter music, I incrementally compile it as I go.
> >> I do my work on a Mac running OS 10.4. There are a fixed number of
> >> pids available for all the programs running on the Mac.
>
> > Excuse my ignorance, but what
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Brett McCoy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Bobber wrote:
>
> > I have been having a discussion with a small publisher who uses the music
> > manuscript program called Score. He says that neither Lilypond or Finale
> > can produce engraving that is compa
> --
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:57:49 -0600
> From: Bobber
> Subject: Lilypond vs Score
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <4b674e5d.3030...@kc0dxf.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
>
> I have been having a dis
On 2010-02-01, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
> I'm also curious to hear from anyone who has had experience using
> Score, and comparing to Lilypond output. There are some wacky
> examples of Score output at:
> http://www.scoremus.com/
>
> (especially that deer standing on the staff! There needs to b
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:57:49PM -0600, Bobber wrote:
> I have been having a discussion with a small publisher who uses the
> music manuscript program called Score. He says that neither Lilypond or
> Finale can produce engraving that is comparable to Score. And that most
> of the major mu
On 02.02.2010, at 00:00, -Eluze wrote:
% weird:
breaks = { s 1 * 44 }
music = { \repeat unfold 3 { c c c r } }
<< \music \\ \breaks >>
translates to:
breaks = "s1*44"
music = {\repeat unfold 3{ c1*44 c1*44 c1*44 r1*44}}
<<\music\\breaks>>
See the problem? Remember lilypond copies the previo
Hi Bob,
SCORE is an old program and, while I think it is still being supported,
I don't think it's under active development. It's a DOS program and
there have been rumors for years of a Windows port, but no one seems to
know whether it's happening or not.
While a small number of publishers a
I'll now post this to the entire list!
It's been a long time since I've used Score (late 90s), but one of the great
things about the program was the precise control it allowed of all elements
in a score. For example, it allowed you to specify the exact horizontal and
vertical positions of all obj
Graham Percival wrote:
Score can do stuff like having the staves in a spiral. Think of
George Crumb -- if he used any computer engraver, it would be
score. Score is also not free: it's not open source, and IIRC it
costs $500 or more.
I only saw it briefly a few years ago. I think our fonts ar
On 2/1/10 3:08 PM, "David Bobroff" wrote:
> On 2/1/2010 9:57 PM, Bobber wrote:
>>
>> Is anyone familiar with Score and what makes it superior?
>>
>
> to use Finale, but haven't in several years) and he is also probably
> correct when he says that most major publishing houses use Score. The
On 02/02/2010 01:24 AM, Bobber wrote:
That ability would seem to indicate more possibilities. The person I
spoke to who is one of the publishers listed on the Wikipedia page, said
that the output of both Finale and Lilypond was unacceptable for a
professional publisher.
IMHO it's not only the so
Johan Vromans squirrel.nl> writes:
>
> This is really very good stuff!
>
Johan,
Thank you for your report!
1) NumStaveLines has apparently been introduced only in Sib6. Using the value of
NumStaveLines the interpreter decides whether the staff is a normal staff or a
rythmic staff (hence all
I'm not saying it is inconceivable that a DOS-based relic of a program would be
considered
superior to any open source or commercially developed notation software over
the last twenty
years, but claims like this set my bullshit detector clanging like a chinese
fire drill.
Think of it this way-
If a blind singer starts coming to our group, and we already have our songs
in .ly files, is there a way of generating braille copies?
Surfing the web, I see that historically, various hopeful announcements have
been made, but I can't find anything documentationwise.
David Olson
_
Kirill writes:
> 1) NumStaveLines has apparently been introduced only in Sib6. Using
> the value of NumStaveLines the interpreter decides whether the staff
> is a normal staff or a rythmic staff (hence all your staves are
> RhythmicStaffs). I guess I will have to detect it differently for
> Sib5.
59 matches
Mail list logo
