Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Von: Gerard McConnell
Datum: 14. Oktober 2010 00:17:58 MESZ
An: Patrick Schmidt
Betreff: Re: a JEdit/LilyPondTool behaviour
Excellent, that did the trick. The path had parentheses in it -
folder(9)
Many thanks Patrick.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:26 PM,
How does one get the chords below the staff? - Searches only gives how
to them there by mistake, by forcing into the staff context.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Original Message -
From: "ornello"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 9:38 AM
Subject: Completion_heads_engraver and \noBreak
The \noBreak command seems not to work with automatically tied notes when
using the Completion_heads_engraver.
In the example below, two line breaks ar
so it seems that chords noted <> does not allow to set individual duration
but << >> allows it?
That seems the best solution. Is there a way to have this patch make it into
the next version?
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> "Marc Mouries" writes:
>>
>>> Tim Rowe wrote:
Hans Aberg-2 wrote:
>
> How does one get the chords below the staff? - Searches only gives how
> to them there by mistake, by forcing into the staff context.
>
i don't know where the problem is, but using
\version "2.13.35"
\score {
<<
\new Staff \relative c' {
c1 e1 g1 c1
Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
>
> If you want to prevent breaks at all, you can use the line
>
> \override NonMusicalPaperColumn #'line-break-permission = ##f
>
> as in the example below.
>
Thanks Phil,
you helped me a lot! This is a much better solution than using \noBreaks.
Below I have exte
Hi Antheo,
> so it seems that chords noted <> does not allow to set individual duration
> but << >> allows it?
Be sure to read the documentation carefully:
<> is a chord structure.
<<>> is not a chord structure.
> That seems the best solution.
Not as far as I can see.
> Is there a way
On 14 Oct 2010, at 17:03, -Eluze wrote:
How does one get the chords below the staff? - Searches only give how
to get them there by mistake, by forcing into the staff context.
i don't know where the problem is, but using
\version "2.13.35"
\score {
<<
\new Staff \relative c' {
c1 e1
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi Antheo,
>
>> so it seems that chords noted <> does not allow to set individual duration
>> but << >> allows it?
>
> Be sure to read the documentation carefully:
> <> is a chord structure.
> <<>> is not a chord structure.
>
>> That seems the best solution.
>
Am 13.10.2010 23:20, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi everyone!
My name is Jan and i'm form Poland.
First of all, i'd like to thank all contributors for their time and
work. I'm using LilyPond for some time now and it's really great to
see that i need less manual tweaks in my scores now than i needed
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:06 +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2010, at 17:03, -Eluze wrote:
>
> >> How does one get the chords below the staff? - Searches only give how
> >> to get them there by mistake, by forcing into the staff context.
> >
> > i don't know where the problem is, but using
> >
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 07:24:45PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
>
> I found I can move the chord symbols by moving the \chordmode block
> before the \new Staff. What puzzles me is the c 1*4 syntax; that I
> can't get to produce anything. In order to get 4 C notes, I had to
> \repeat unfold 4 { c
I have discovered lilypond, mainly as a way to print excellent sheet music
with tabs and staff that has been initially cobbled together in tuxguitar.
After spending a little time trying to understand lilypond, I have come to
the conclusion that there is something quite particular about tuxguitar's
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:44:12PM +1000, Alan E. Davis wrote:
>I have discovered lilypond, mainly as a way to print excellent sheet music
>with tabs and staff that has been initially cobbled together in
>tuxguitar. After spending a little time trying to understand lilypond, I
>hav
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:04:46PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 03:59 +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> > and you'll see a similar thing. There's a special context
> > called... err... NoteHeadAutoSplit ? nope, that's totally
> > wrong... anyway, that thing automatically spl
On Oct 15, 2010, at 12:09 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In the following example, how can i make an indent in the third system (the
> one in which both staffs appear) so that the staff name "Contralto" fits on
> the page, while leaving indentation in other systems intact?
I would do it a
On Oct 15, 2010, at 6:04 AM, Colin Campbell wrote:
>
> I got the attached .PDF Seems to me that four times a whole note should
> take up more bars than one, or at least look a whole (!) lot different
> than the note to the left, IIUC it should be a longa, as in the second
> staff.
You may want t
17 matches
Mail list logo
