Arne Peters wrote:
>
> hello Eluze,
>
> your snippet works like a charm ... in itself, but when I apply it to my
> files it messes up like this:
>
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p30910757/timechange2.png
> (taken from the alto part)
>
> I'll dig into it later, for now I'll cheat my way around
hello Eluze,
your snippet works like a charm ... in itself, but when I apply it to my
files it messes up like this:
http://old.nabble.com/file/p30910757/timechange2.png
(taken from the alto part)
I'll dig into it later, for now I'll cheat my way around by importing the
page as a graphic file i
Op schreef Éditions IN NOMINE :
> With my Firefox3.6.13, it says :
> Une erreur système inattendue s'est produite.
> java.lang.NullPointerException
Finally we were able to reproduce the behaviour you have reported: The URL
http://www.scorio.com delivers a blank page reading:
"java.lang.NullPoint
Arne Peters wrote:
>
> hello list,
>
> In C.H.Graun's "Te Deum" there are time signature changes within bars (see
> attached image).
> I've searched the LSR and NR but could not find anything whicht would help
> me along...
>
>
> Does some have an idea or could point me to the appropriate pla
hello list,
In C.H.Graun's "Te Deum" there are time signature changes within bars (see
attached image).
I've searched the LSR and NR but could not find anything whicht would help
me along...
Does some have an idea or could point me to the appropriate place in the
manuals in case I have overlook
On 02/12/2011 12:46 AM, Ole Schmidt wrote:
the "=" sign is now a bit low, but I don't know how to raise it- I can live
with that...
Maybe try vertically centering the lot with \vcenter {}...
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http:
2011/2/12 Trevor Daniels :
>
> Jan Warchoł wrote Saturday, February 12, 2011 9:25 AM
>
>> I agree too, but in my opinion it's a less important problem than the
>> one marked in red in the attachment. (However, it was present in
>> 2.12.3 too).
>> The natural on c is perhaps moved because of the dot
Jan Warchoł wrote Saturday, February 12, 2011 9:25 AM
I agree too, but in my opinion it's a less important problem than
the
one marked in red in the attachment. (However, it was present in
2.12.3 too).
The natural on c is perhaps moved because of the dot on f, but i
don't
think it should be
2011/2/10 Trevor Daniels :
>
> Keith OHara wrote Thursday, February 10, 2011 3:19 AM
>> It is looking better now in 2.13.49.
>> This two-bar example contains several difficult music-engraving issues,
>> especially if I include the enharmonic spellings and key cancellation from
>> the original editi
