On 11 June 2011 05:31, Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net wrote:
in the following code, lily prints both a natural and sharp sign before the
G #.
Why?
Is there a way to avoid that?
\version 2.14
\language english
{ \relative d' {
\key df \major
df ef f gs af bf c df
}
}
Because
On 11 June 2011 06:29, Edward Neeman edward.nee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
How do you remove empty staves from a PianoStaff context? The following
used to work in 2.12, but it no longer works in 2.14:
\version 2.14.0
\new PianoStaff
\relative c' { c1
On 11/06/11 13:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 6/10/11 8:25 PM, Nick Paynenick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
If I'm setting out a scale that goes over more than one stave, and use
\remove Bar_engraver to remove the barlines, then the clef (and key
signature if any) also disappear from the second
- Original Message -
From: Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: Removing Bar_engraver removes clef
On 11/06/11 13:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 6/10/11 8:25 PM, Nick Paynenick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
Aha! Thanks!
Edward
On 6/11/11 3:11 AM, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
On 11 June 2011 06:29, Edward Neeman edward.nee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
How do you remove empty staves from a PianoStaff context? The following
used to work in 2.12, but it no
Colin : Thank you very much. Now I have two icon for frescobaldi - one for
each
version (2.12.3 2.14.0).
Federico; David; janek; Helge : Thank you all for helping / (showing pointers
to) me on frescobaldi/lilypond setup/install the past few days. It is fruitful
and I am very much
On 11 June 2011 14:57, Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net wrote:
thanks for the info.
This is standard typesetting rules.
I have several copies of Debussy clair de lune in D flat and I have never
seen a natural sign before the g sharp
Here is an example on IMSLP:
- Original Message -
From: Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com
To: Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net
Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: why does lily prints both a natural and sharp sign?
On 11 June 2011 14:57, Marc Mouries
Hi all,
In the book I'm engraving, it happens that some instruments get tacet
for certain pieces. In order to generate a full table of contents, I
treat them through Devnull. The problem is that I often get what follows.
In this tiny example, I would like the devnull to not take any
Hi y'all,
I'm arranging some Haydn string quartets and found some Lilypond files of
them on Mutopia, but when I go to generate them I get an error saying that
the version is too old (2.6.0) and that only versions 2.7.38 and up are
supported. I'd hate to have to create the whole thing again, so
On 11-06-11 08:38 AM, Brent Annable wrote:
Hi y'all,
I'm arranging some Haydn string quartets and found some Lilypond files
of them on Mutopia, but when I go to generate them I get an error
saying that the version is too old (2.6.0) and that only versions
2.7.38 and up are supported. I'd
On 11-06-11 05:39 AM, MING TSANG wrote:
Colin : Thank you very much. Now I have two icon for frescobaldi -
one for each version (2.12.3 2.14.0).
Federico; David; janek; Helge : Thank you all for helping / (showing
pointers to) me on frescobaldi/lilypond setup/install the past few
days. It
Hi Colin,
Thanks very much, I'm still relatively new to all this and never knew about
convert-ly. Just so you know, it can be run in batch mode: to convert all
the files in a directory you type:
convert-ly -e *.ly
I had everything converted in a jiffy! Much obliged.
Brent.
On 11 June 2011
I'm using lilypond book with latex and I want to write a sentence like this:
Guitar music is written with a treble clef \musicglyph #clefs.G rather than
a bass clef \musicglyph #clefs.F, which is correctly indicated by a small 8
under the treble clef \musicglyph #treble_8.
and get music
Hello,
As 2.14 is out now, I would like to know if a 2.14 version of WebLily is
planned soon.
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/WebLily-with-2.14---tp31825341p31825341.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello,
I'm working on a LaTeX package to include lilypond glyphs in LaTeX, but it's
quite basic about size and some combination (like G key with the octave
symbol). I hope having it working during summer.
In the example below, there is no octave symbol for the 2nd G key, and the F
key is too
Am 11.06.2011 03:15, schrieb Patrick McCarty:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 10.06.2011 17:55, schrieb Patrick McCarty:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.dewrote:
Hello list,
I needed some lilypond svg graphics, and while
I'm trying to separate my layout from my notes - what I'd like to have is
something like:
Notes =
{
R1*4/4*4 |
}
Layout =
{
s1*4/4*1 |
s1*4/4*1 |
s1*4/4*1 |
s1*4/4*1 |
}
\score
{
I do not know it is standard typesetting rules that accidentals _at
the key signature_ implies extra naturals, though.
Some people have valuable (books) references, such as Ted Ross or
Gardner Read, maybe they could check the rules concerning key
signature and extra naturals.
I am not aware
2011/6/11 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
I've looked at Ted Ross, Kurt Stone, Gardner Read and Elaine Gould and
can't
find any explicit mention of this.
AFAIK this was a common practice in XIXth century engraving (a period
that LilyPond tries to mimic), but it is
On 11-06-11 09:38 AM, Brent Annable wrote:
Hi Colin,
Thanks very much, I'm still relatively new to all this and never knew
about convert-ly. Just so you know, it can be run in batch mode: to
convert all the files in a directory you type:
convert-ly -e *.ly
I had everything converted in a
On p. 125 of my Gardner Read (1964), it says:
To cancel the double flat and restore the original single flat, it
was formerly required—as cited in the rules on page 123—to write a
natural sign plus the single flat. Today the tendency is to use merely
the single flat-sign without the natural. It
Thank you! That works!
It does put bar numbers on every staff, though. To fix it, change the
#'break-visibility option in each staff. Tthis is what part of my
\score block looks like:
%% Begin excerpt
\new ChoirStaff
\new Staff = womenChoirOne
\override
23 matches
Mail list logo
