At Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:06:48 -0400,
lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 05:36:51 + (UTC)
> From: Keith OHara
> Subject: Re: Best Practices for Multiple Part Scores
>
> 1) http://www.mutopiaproject.org/
> Jay Anderson has posted some large-ensemble scores (Mozart Hor
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 26 June 2011 17:40, Nick Baskin wrote:
>
> > After moving the Bar_number_engraver, the Timing_translator, and the
> > Default_bar_line_engraver to the Staff context, everything seems to be
> > working correctly except for the repeat. The
2011/7/7 Kieren MacMillan
>
> Hello Andrew,
>
> > What is frustrating to me is that doing something that
> > seems to be standard in music notation (such as writing multiple
> > parts) takes so much manual effort and so many hacks to look good.
> > And there is much more documentation for strange
I've tried searching the doco and figuring it out but haven't been able to
:(
Just want to be able to add some more space between notes so that the
fingering
notation is visible. In my below example the ukulele F chord "1" finger
notation is hidden behind the previous C chord.
Thanks in advance.
Op Fri, 8 Jul 2011 23:38:49 +1000
Scott Rippon schreef:
> -"F"
Try this:
\tweak #'padding #1.5
--
Wilbert Berendsen
(http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
2011/7/9 Janek Warchoł :
> W dniu 8 lipca 2011 00:14 użytkownik James Lowe
> napisał:
>> until you really print out a score and plop it on your music stand and then
>> have sharps and flats and time signatures and other ornamentation, I don't
>> really think one can make a definite case for eith
Oops, forgot the "?" in
#(define-markup-command (dynamicStringRight layout props dyn)(string?)
...
Now it compiles as expected !
Cheers,
Harm
harm6 wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Code:
>
> \version "2.14.1"
>
> #(define-public (char-punct
On Jul 9, 2011, at 16:58, Janek Warchoł
wrote:
> 2011/7/9 Janek Warchoł :
>> W dniu 8 lipca 2011 00:14 użytkownik James Lowe
>> napisał:
>>> until you really print out a score and plop it on your music stand and then
>>> have sharps and flats and time signatures and other ornamentation, I don'
* Janek Warchoł [2011-07-06 21:10]:
Which one of the clefs in the attachment do you like best?
I'm not sure. I think the thickness of that line is more at fault than
its direction. It should be (IMO anyway) as thin as a note stem or
thinner. I suspect that the original intent was to get away
At Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:43:11 +,
James Lowe wrote:
> You can explicitly state which 'events' (slurs, ties etc) you want in the cue
> part
>
> \set Score.quotedCueEventTypes = #'(your event here ...)
>
> I know (as I revamped this entire section very recently) that there are
> potentially
I'm wondering if this is only me?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/index.html
-->
Content Encoding Error
The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or
unsupported form of compression.
Ubuntu 10.04, Firefox 3.6.18.
James
--
James Harkins //
That page displays no problem for me with both Firefox 5 and Chrome 12
on Ubuntu 10.04
Nick
On 10/07/11 13:12, James Harkins wrote:
I'm wondering if this is only me?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/index.html
-->
Content Encoding Error
The page you are trying to view ca
> Do you think it would be a good idea to include both current Lily
> clef and the one suggested by me in the font?
Yes, definitely! For example in your bww 988 example, I still think
that the larger clef looks much better. Your idea of making the line
through the spiral a bit more straight is
> I really like the new clef in your recompiled examples. I vote for
> at least including both options if not replacing the existing one
> altogether. Thanks for your work on this, Janek, the treble clef
> has been one of Lily's weakest visual aspects IMO.
Please don't forget that lilypond's clef
14 matches
Mail list logo
