Re: Re:Dynamic context that can follow system breaks?

2012-04-14 Thread -Eluze
James Harkins-2 wrote: > > > Actually, this doesn't help in 2.14.2 -- same result with this: > > I had tested with 2.15.36 where it seems ok. now I run 2.14.2 and it looks queer from beginning (the dynamics are to far off below the staff). Eluze -- View this message in context: http://ol

hideNotes in tablature

2012-04-14 Thread Federico Bruni
Hi, I started using version 2.13.56 and I realized that this bug seems fixed: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1459 As hideNotes/unHideNotes work fine in TabStaff now, I'm thinking that it would be nice to add a TabNoteHead override/revert in their definitions in property-ini

extra repeat opening bar (related to \hideNotes?)

2012-04-14 Thread Federico Bruni
Hi LilyPonders, unfortunately I'm not able to create a minimal example which reproduces the problem. Find attached a simplified version of my file. The problem is in bar 20. If you comment the line starting with \hideNotes, then the repeat bar is printed once instead of twice. This is a speci

Re: hideNotes in tablature

2012-04-14 Thread James
Federico, On 14 April 2012 10:57, Federico Bruni wrote: > Hi, > > I started using version 2.13.56 and I realized that this bug seems fixed: > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1459 > > As hideNotes/unHideNotes work fine in TabStaff now, I'm thinking that it > would be nice to add

Re: extra repeat opening bar (related to \hideNotes?)

2012-04-14 Thread James
Hello, On 14 April 2012 12:13, Federico Bruni wrote: > Hi LilyPonders, > > unfortunately I'm not able to create a minimal example which reproduces the > problem. Find attached a simplified version of my file. So are you _really_ saying if you remove a *single* line from your \global settings the

Re: extra repeat opening bar (related to \hideNotes?)

2012-04-14 Thread Federico Bruni
Il 14/04/2012 13:26, James ha scritto: So are you_really_ saying if you remove a*single* line from your \global settings the problem goes away? For instance if were to remove the \key d \major line or the \time 4/4 line the problem 'goes away'? Not any single line, but line 91 of the file I a

Re: extra repeat opening bar (related to \hideNotes?)

2012-04-14 Thread Mark Knoop
At 13:36 on 14 Apr 2012, Federico Bruni wrote: >Il 14/04/2012 13:26, James ha scritto: >> So are you_really_ saying if you remove a*single* line from your >> \global settings the problem goes away? For instance if were to >> remove the \key d \major line or the \time 4/4 line the problem >> 'goes

Re: extra repeat opening bar (related to \hideNotes?)

2012-04-14 Thread Federico Bruni
Il 14/04/2012 14:17, Mark Knoop ha scritto: See "Known issues and warnings" here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Special-rhythmic-concerns#Grace-notes Thanks Mark! I added \grace { s8 } to the other voice and now the output is correct. _

Re: hideNotes in tablature

2012-04-14 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 14.04.2012 11:57, schrieb Federico Bruni: Hi, I started using version 2.13.56 and I realized that this bug seems fixed: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1459 As hideNotes/unHideNotes work fine in TabStaff now, I'm thinking that it would be nice to add a TabNoteHead overrid

Re:Dynamic context that can follow system breaks?

2012-04-14 Thread James Harkins
From: -Eluze Subject: Re: Re:Dynamic context that can follow system breaks? > I had tested with 2.15.36 where it seems ok. > > now I run 2.14.2 and it looks queer from beginning (the dynamics are to far > off below the staff). Yes, that's exactly the problem I saw. But... Oh, wow, the dynamics

Re: hideNotes in tablature

2012-04-14 Thread James
Hello, On 14 April 2012 15:47, Marc Hohl wrote: > Am 14.04.2012 11:57, schrieb Federico Bruni: >> >> Hi, >> >> I started using version 2.13.56 and I realized that this bug seems fixed: >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1459 I'll verify that if no one else has. I am building a

larger rehearsal marks

2012-04-14 Thread Mogens Lemvig Hansen
How do I make (just) the rehearsal marks larger? I have, as recommended in the docs, looked at the file scm/translation-functions.scm I see that make-bold-markup makes the marks bold, but I do not see a similar make-larger-markup function, nor can I find where make-bold-markup is defined. Re

Re: larger rehearsal marks

2012-04-14 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Mogens, > How do I make (just) the rehearsal marks larger? > I have, as recommended in the docs, looked at the file > scm/translation-functions.scm > I see that make-bold-markup makes the marks bold, but I do not see a similar > make-larger-markup function, nor can I find where make-bold-mark

Re: larger rehearsal marks

2012-04-14 Thread James
Hello, On 14 April 2012 20:26, Mogens Lemvig Hansen wrote: > How do I make (just) the rehearsal marks larger? Just add an appropriate extra font markup in your \mark command \mark \markup { \huge F } See also http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/formatting-text#selecting-font-

Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting

2012-04-14 Thread Hans Aikema
On 13-4-2012 11:27, Gagi Petrovic wrote: PS If somebody also can help me with making the whole rests look more clear: how do I add the horizontal line (see wholerest.png) on top of it? I would appreciate it a lot!

Re: larger rehearsal marks

2012-04-14 Thread Mogens Lemvig Hansen
Hi all, Responses so far indicate that I wasn't clear. Again, I would like to have larger rehearsal marks. With explicit markup, it is easy, \mark \markup { \huge F } but how do I do it with the default marks, \mark \default ? -Original Message- From: Mogens Lemvig Hansen Sent: S

Re: larger rehearsal marks

2012-04-14 Thread James
Hello, On 14 April 2012 21:24, Mogens Lemvig Hansen wrote: > Hi all, > > Responses so far indicate that I wasn't clear.  Again, > I would like to have larger rehearsal marks. > With explicit markup, it is easy, >  \mark \markup { \huge F } > > but how do I do it with the default marks, >  \mark \

Re: larger rehearsal marks

2012-04-14 Thread Mogens Lemvig Hansen
Thank you! Now I see the link at the bottom of the docs on Rehearsal marks to RehearsalMarks in the Internals Reference, and that page in turn lists font-size as a parameter. Why is it always so obvious after the fact. Sigh. Thanks again, Mogens -Original Message- From: James Sent

Re: hideNotes in tablature

2012-04-14 Thread Federico Bruni
Il 14/04/2012 21:09, James ha scritto: Hello, On 14 April 2012 15:47, Marc Hohl wrote: Am 14.04.2012 11:57, schrieb Federico Bruni: Hi, I started using version 2.13.56 and I realized that this bug seems fixed: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1459 I'll verify that if no