On 27/09/12 14:37, pabuhr wrote:
> \version "2.16.0"
> \language english
> #(set-global-staff-size 25)
>
> su = \stemUp
> sd = \stemDown
>
> melody = \relative c'' {
> << { \sd a,4. a8 } \\ { \su a16 a' c a c a a, a'} >> << { \sd d,4. d8 }
> \\ { \su d16 a' b a b a d, a' } >> |
> } % melody
Is there an easy way to get the 1st/9th noteheads to overlap like the 7th/15th
noteheads overlap?
\version "2.16.0"
\language english
#(set-global-staff-size 25)
su = \stemUp
sd = \stemDown
melody = \relative c'' {
<< { \sd a,4. a8 } \\ { \su a16 a' c a c a a, a'} >> << { \sd d,4. d8 }
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
ornello wrote:
> However as all chord notes (musically) belong to the same voice I
> would like to notate the entire chord within the same context. Is it
> somehow possible to write a cross-staff chord within one staff
> context only (using \change Staff)?
Hello
2012/9/24 Janek Warchoł
> I think this is something that should be listed on our website, both
> in http://lilypond.org/productions.html (bug squad, please raise an
> issue) as well as in Pondings section (Mike?).
>
This has been added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=
2012/9/26 Thomas Morley :
> 2012/9/26 Thomas Morley :
>> 2012/9/26 Oscar Dub
>>>
>>> Thanks to both!
>>>
>>> Janek, your information about accessing the internals of Feta and LilyPond
>>> is very useful. As there's no way to add .mf syntax to a LilyPond file (as
>>> far as I know), I'm going to tr
Am 26.09.2012 22:53, schrieb Thomas Morley:
2012/9/26 Oscar Dub
[...]
Hi Oscar,
you're very close.
Step by step:
[...]
HTH,
Harm
Wow. Great stuff, well explained. Kudos!
Marc
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://l
On 27/09/12 01:41, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/9/26 Urs Liska :
>> Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
>>> the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
>>> the same musical time.
>>>
>> Oh y
2012/9/26 Oscar Dub
>
> Thanks to both!
>
> Janek, your information about accessing the internals of Feta and LilyPond
> is very useful. As there's no way to add .mf syntax to a LilyPond file (as
> far as I know), I'm going to try to follow along Marc's lines. It would be
> great to solve the prob
Thanks to both!Janek, your information about accessing the internals of Feta and LilyPond is very useful. As there's no way to add .mf syntax to a LilyPond file (as far as I know), I'm going to try to follow along Marc's lines. It would be great to solve the problem without hacking LilyPond's sourc
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/9/26 Urs Liska :
>> Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
>>> the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
>>> the same musical time.
>>>
>> Oh yeah, that's some
2012/9/26 Urs Liska :
> Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
>> the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
>> the same musical time.
>>
> Oh yeah, that's something I'd second.
> In an ideal w
2012/9/26 Christ van Willegen :
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
>> TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the
>> same file, updates in one window are immediately live in the other.
>
> Vim can do that with as many windows as you'd like...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
> TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the
> same file, updates in one window are immediately live in the other.
Vim can do that with as many windows as you'd like...
Christ van Willegen
--
09 F9 11 02 9D 7
On 26 Sep 2012, at 14:06 , Urs Liska wrote:
Oh yeah, that's something I'd second.
In an ideal world these windows wouldn't only go into the same file
but into the same piece of music.
TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and
the same file, updates in one window
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM,
wrote:
> @the current threat regarding parallel music. [...]
please reply in appropriate thread - there's so many emails these days
that it's already hard not to get lost :)
Janek
PS it's thread, not threat - the second word has completely different
meaning, an
Well, i tried to write a piano-piece with parallel music, but as some or you
mentioned in the threat the code gets out of control ( in terms of
readability) very quickly even if you put some tweaks into.
@the current threat regarding parallel music. I think there are only 2
options:
1) it will be
Urs Liska writes:
> But I think this would be quite complex, because the editor would have
> to know the musical moment we are at. Which seems complicated from the
> beginning, but if we start to (re-)use variables ...
Seems like point-and-click Midi would deliver most of the required
informatio
Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
Janek Warchoł writes:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
wrote:
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
"regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" a
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>>>
>>> What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
>>> "regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
>>>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
wrote:
>
> On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>>
>> What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
>> "regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
>> above would be displayed as (view
Am 26.09.2012 13:53, schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
"regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
above would be displayed as (view using monospace font):
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
"regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
above would be displayed as (view using monospace font):
<<
{ a4 b c d e f g a ea g
On 26 sept. 2012, at 13:08, TaoCG wrote:
> I'm having slurs collide with tuplet brackets.
> I tried \override Score.TupletBracket #'avoid-slur #'around (and other
> values) but they don't seem to have any effect.
>
Slurs in LilyPond do not currently avoid tuplet brackets. Please file a bug
re
I'm having slurs collide with tuplet brackets.
I tried \override Score.TupletBracket #'avoid-slur #'around (and other
values) but they don't seem to have any effect.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-collisions-tp133630.html
Sent from the User mailing l
On 26/09/12 18:05, Stefan Thomas wrote:
> Dear community,
> I have a problem with a sheme-function that does'nt work any more.
> I get the error message:
>
> wrong type for argument 1. Expecting character, found "D"
> \markup { \slashed-char
>#"D" }
>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Nils Gey wrote:
> I have to see if Frescobaldi has an internal representation of durations
> and time signatures/bar length, but I guess not. This way the conversion
> from parallel back to sequential is a bit tricky since you need to keep track
> of the current
Nils Gey writes:
> I have to see if Frescobaldi has an internal representation of
> durations and time signatures/bar length, but I guess not.
Really? I know Emacs has it since it complains when you place bar
checks at the "wrong" point of time. Frescobaldi, judging from its
description, appea
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:53:23 +0200
Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of the things that i find inconvenient in reading Lily syntax is
> its sequential nature. For example,
>
> <<
> {
> a4 b c d
> e f g a
> e a g f
> }
> {
> e4 a g f
> c2 e
> d8 c f4 d2
> }
>
Am 26.09.2012 10:51, schrieb Stefan Thomas:
Dear David,
I tried it, as You've suggested, with \slashed-char ##\D, but it
doesn't work.
IIUC he didn't suggest ##\D but to use (string? ...) instead of (char? ...)
at the beginning of the definition.
I think I will try to use postscript-code in my
Stefan Thomas writes:
> Dear David,
> I tried it, as You've suggested, with \slashed-char ##\D, but it
> doesn't work.
I suggest that you read my original reply completely.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https:
Hi,
one of the things that i find inconvenient in reading Lily syntax is
its sequential nature. For example,
<<
{
a4 b c d
e f g a
e a g f
}
{
e4 a g f
c2 e
d8 c f4 d2
}
>>
it's hard to read the harmonies from the code, because voices are separate.
I know abou
Dear David,
I tried it, as You've suggested, with \slashed-char ##\D, but it doesn't
work.
I think I will try to use postscript-code in my library for function
symbols.
Are there other people interested in a library with functional symbols?
Is this something, that could be of interest for the 2.18.
Am 26.09.2012 02:30, schrieb Oscar Dub:
Hi,
I'm trying to typeset a score that uses the notation shown in the
attached image to represent whole rests.
As I see it there are two stages to achieving this in LilyPond:
– Creating the necessary glyph (I assume the simplest way would be to
edit sc
David Kastrup writes:
>> \version "2.16.0"
>> % Inspired by slashed-digit from scm/define-markup.scm:
>> #(define-markup-command (slashed-char layout props ch) (char?)
>
> Uh, you are aware that (char? "D") is false? In 2.14,
> define-markup-command did not actually apply the predicate but rathe
Stefan Thomas writes:
> Dear community,
> I have a problem with a sheme-function that does'nt work any more.
> I get the error message:
>
> wrong type for argument 1. Expecting character, found "D"
> \markup { \slashed-char
> #"D" }
>
> I need it a slashed letter, it is necessary for
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:00 PM,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to share some thoughts about piano music with you.
> [...]
>
> Lilypond does in my opinion ~70% perfect job, but takes too much control.
> The score looks pretty beautiful at the first glance, but to make it perfekt
> and complete, you
Dear community,
I have a problem with a sheme-function that does'nt work any more.
I get the error message:
> wrong type for argument 1. Expecting character, found "D"
> \markup { \slashed-char
>#"D" }
>
I need it a slashed letter, it is necessary for some symb
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> On 2012-09-26 00:25, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>> before you try this out, please search for a \shape Slur function.
>>> We discussed it here on the list, but as far as I know it is now also
>>> built in.
>>> It _massively_ simplifies the handling of
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:55 PM, bthom wrote:
> Hope you can clarify why
>
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=838
>
> produces code snippet
>
> but
>
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=838
>
> produces typeset result.
?
they are just two different links, pointing to two separate webp
39 matches
Mail list logo
