I've been working on the last version of David Nalesnik's guide-finger code.
The reason is a horizontal and vertical placement problem when the guide line
is long and/or at a steep angle. I have managed to fix the vertical problem,
but the horizontal problem has me flummoxed. The example below show
Daniel Rosen writes:
> I'm trying to create a score and parts for a piece. I want to have bow
> markings in the string parts but not the score, so I'm trying to put
> them in a voice separate from the notes (ex. 1):
Don't do that. Put them in the same voice, or they won't combine well.
> \vers
On 18/10/12 08:32, Daniel Rosen wrote:
>
> I'm trying to create a score and parts for a piece. I want to have bow
> markings in the string parts but not the score, so I'm trying to put
> them in a voice separate from the notes (ex. 1):
>
>
>
> \version "2.16.0"
>
>
>
> music = \relative c'' {
>
Daniel Rosen wrote
> I'm trying to create a score and parts for a piece. I want to have bow
> markings in the string parts but not the score, so I'm trying to put them
> in a voice separate from the notes (ex. 1):
>
> My issue is that, when I compile the part, the bow markings don't
> automaticall
I'm trying to create a score and parts for a piece. I want to have bow markings
in the string parts but not the score, so I'm trying to put them in a voice
separate from the notes (ex. 1):
\version "2.16.0"
music = \relative c'' {
}
bowing = {
s\upbow s\downbow
}
{
\new Staff
<<
On 18/10/2012, at 2:47 am, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
>
>> The Harvard Concise says that originally (c. 1675-1725), acciaccatura was
>> the crush, but it did not have a special notation. The others are all called
>> appoggiatura. The slashed grace note notation was invented in the 19th
>> century,
Stefan Thomas writes:
> Are You sure that is an "Urtext" and not a kind of later arrangement of
> this piece?
>
> 2012/10/17 Mark Stephen Mrotek
>
>> The Harvard Concise is not in my possession. I do have a copy of Haydn's
>> Keyboard Concerto No. 11 in D. The acciaccatura (small eight notes wi
Hi,
With the following code (mainly stolen from
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/vertical-text-tt31444.html), I
could get some vertical text at the end of my score:
%%
\version "2.16.0"
markVerticalText =
#(define-music-function (parser location text) (string?)
#{
\once \over
Hi Peter,
There's a link to the left of the repository address with the word "zip"
and a little icon of a cloud on it that will let you download all the files
as a zip archive. Here's the link:
https://github.com/mwitmer/LyUtil/zipball/master.
Hope that helps!
Mark
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:35
Article "appoggiatura" says: "The 19th century brought still further changes in
the treatment of the appoggiatura. The long appoggiatura became absorbed in the
ordinary notation, and the short appoggiatura was invariably indicated by a
small note with a single stroke across its stem, called a gr
Are You sure that is an "Urtext" and not a kind of later arrangement of
this piece?
2012/10/17 Mark Stephen Mrotek
> The Harvard Concise is not in my possession. I do have a copy of Haydn's
> Keyboard Concerto No. 11 in D. The acciaccatura (small eight notes with
> diagonal stroke "tied" to the
The Harvard Concise is not in my possession. I do have a copy of Haydn's
Keyboard Concerto No. 11 in D. The acciaccatura (small eight notes with
diagonal stroke "tied" to the principal note) appears multiple times in the
first and third movements. This concerto was published in 1782.
Mark Stephen
On 16 Oct 2012, at 19:20, David Rogers wrote:
> I don't have any of the engraving manuals - what is this note called
> in those books? It would probably be better to go along with the
> "industry standard name", even if that name turns out not to be
> perfect.
The Harvard Concise says that origin
I have tried downloading this code as part of learning about scheme. Every way
I try is thwarted - I even down loaded the Git for
Windows stuff. I did manage to browse a file but cut and paste just produced
one long line and the download option does not work
which is a shame.
__
So, some years ago I wrote this code for an alternative method of displaying
chord symbols.
It still worked fine in 2.14 but not so in 2.16. I tried running convert-ly
but it didn't change anything.
Details and code can be found in this thread:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/chord-symbols-a
Dear Mark,
do you have Lilypond 2.16 installed? And have you set the correct path
in Frescobaldi? Please check in Frescobaldi something like:
Edit > Options, then Lilypond-Options. There the lilypond-windows.exe
should correspond to your Lilypond installation, which is usually in
C:\Program Files\
Thanks, Eluze!
Yes, the output is correct. I was just fighting my way through a long list of
errors and warnings, trying to understand.
Best regards
Kai
... von unterwegs gesendet!
Am 09.10.2012 um 23:21 schrieb Eluze :
> "Dr. med. Kai Lautenschläger" wrote
>> The following warning is give
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Nick Payne" ; ;
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: Manual search returns results from wrong version
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:02:18AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
It's a common header, used on all
18 matches
Mail list logo
