Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

Robert Schmaus writes: > Hi everyone, > > I haven't read all posts on this subject, so sorry should I write > something that's already been written. > Why not keep the \relative { } syntax as one supported > way and simply change the \relative { } syntax to what David > proposed? Uh, that was

Re: midi micro tuning / Midi calibration

Robert Schmaus writes: > Hi Arthur & Timothy, > >> You've brought up a good question. Sounds like you may do "Early Music", >> too. > > Thanks! Although I have to admit, that my music only goes as early as > the Swing Era - Big Bands usually are tuned to 442 as it fits the brass > better. I'm

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013, at 09:06 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Robert Schmaus writes: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I haven't read all posts on this subject, so sorry should I write > > something that's already been written. > > Why not keep the \relative { } syntax as one supported > > way and simply

Re: midi micro tuning / Midi calibration

On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, David Kastrup wrote: Midi, itself, is tuned in 440 and equal. Midi, itself, is not tuned at all. However, there's a function known as "pitch bend" in midi parlance, that works on some, but not all, That's one way to do it. Make sure to set this for each of the Midi

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

David Kastrup writes: > Issue 3229: Patch: Make \relative { ... } interpret the first pitch as > an absolute one +1 -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

Am 07.03.2013 20:21, schrieb Werner LEMBERG: One rationale is to stop the "distribution" of the information for the first pitch to potentially quite separate places, like being able to write \new Staff \relative { \key aes \major << % Voice one { c''2 aes4. bes8 } ... instead o

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

Robert Schmaus writes: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013, at 09:06 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >> Robert Schmaus writes: >> >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > I haven't read all posts on this subject, so sorry should I write >> > something that's already been written. >> > Why not keep the \relative { } syntax as

Re:Proposed new available and recommended behaviour of \relative

Dear LilyPond users, Am I right in saying that the proposed new \relative {}, where the first pitch is absolute, is equivalent to simply writing \relative f {} in current usage? That might make it easier to explain in documentation than trying to explain that the first note is treated differen

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behaviour of \relative

Kevin Barry writes: > Dear LilyPond users, > > Am I right in saying that the proposed new \relative {}, where the > first pitch is absolute, is equivalent to simply writing \relative f > {} in current usage? Yes in Western scales. > That might make it easier to explain in documentation than try

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behaviour of \relative

David Kastrup writes: > What is the resulting pitch of > > \relative c' { ces, } ? > > Quick, without thinking? What is the resulting pitch of > > \relative f { fes, } ? > > Quick, without thinking? What is the proposed resulting pitch of > > \relative { fes, } ? > > Now there is not even an op

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

David Kastrup writes: > Martin Tarenskeen writes: > The idea is that \relative { ... } (namely \relative used without an explicit reference pitch) uses the first note inside as the reference pitch. That is, if the first note happens to be written as fis'' it will sound as fi

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

Colin Hall writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> Martin Tarenskeen writes: >> > The idea is that \relative { ... } (namely \relative used without an > explicit reference pitch) uses the first note inside as the reference > pitch. That is, if the first note happens to be written as fi

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

>> Well... if you just don't emit the warning if the first pitch in a >> \relative {} block is incorrect, then it seems like you get exactly >> the current proposal except that you have to spell \relative { c'' >> } as \relative { c='' } instead. > > I like that idea! Indeed, this has some benef

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

Werner LEMBERG writes: >>> Well... if you just don't emit the warning if the first pitch in a >>> \relative {} block is incorrect, then it seems like you get exactly >>> the current proposal except that you have to spell \relative { c'' >>> } as \relative { c='' } instead. >> >> I like that idea

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

2013/3/8 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : > David Kastrup writes: > >> Issue 3229: Patch: Make \relative { ... } interpret the first pitch as >> an absolute one > > +1 +1 , I was currently using \relative f { } anyway, so this would allow removing the f, leaving the {...} intact, which for me would imply a sm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] ly2video 0.4.1

--- ly2video.py.orig2013-03-07 09:40:54.675565398 +0100 +++ ly2video.py2013-03-07 09:52:19.787389048 +0100 @@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ fSanitisedLyFile.write("\\header {\n tagline = ##f composer = ##f\n}\n") headerPart = True -if re.search("ti

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behaviour of \relative

2013/3/8 David Kastrup : > What is the resulting pitch of > > \relative c' { ces, } ? > > Quick, without thinking? Without thinking: I don't know. Good example. > What is the resulting pitch of > > \relative f { fes, } ? > > Quick, without thinking? Without thinking, I know this is an absolute

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

Francisco Vila writes: > 2013/3/8 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : >> David Kastrup writes: >> >>> Issue 3229: Patch: Make \relative { ... } interpret the first pitch as >>> an absolute one >> >> +1 > > +1 , I was currently using \relative f { } anyway, so this would > allow removing the f, leaving the {...}

Re: Bar lines

> To be absolutely clear: i want both an 'end-bar' property and the > thing mentioned above. OK. > Is my explanation clear? Yes, thanks. However, I still don't see the usefulness. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org htt

Re: override stencil question

Hi Rama, On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Rama Gottfried wrote: > here is a working version of the bezier glissando (I just had too many > coordinates in my curveto command). > > still trying to find some reference on the grob-interpret-markup function > -- it seems there are a few of these grob-

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

> Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2013/3/7 David Kastrup : >>> Please take a look at Issue 3229: Patch: Make \relative { ... } interpret the first pitch as an absolute one >> >> To be absolutely clear, am I right that this patch will not affect the >> use of \relative with a given p

Re: Excellent paper on 'Copyfraud'

Thanks for this intersting info Mike. Pierre 2013/3/8 Mike Blackstock > This paper might be of interest to anyone typesetting public domain > music from so-called copyrighted scores: > http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244 > > Abstract: > "Copyfraud is everywhere. False copyr

Re: Excellent paper on 'Copyfraud'

yes, thanks for sharing it! Am 08.03.2013 um 14:22 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider : > Thanks for this intersting info Mike. > Pierre > > 2013/3/8 Mike Blackstock > This paper might be of interest to anyone typesetting public domain > music from so-called copyrighted scores: > http://papers.ssrn

lecker lek-ker in "old" German lyrics

Hello, Some German lyrics from before the times of Neue Deutsche Rechtschreibung feature ck between two syllables. Without Hyphen it is "lecker", with hyphen it is "lek-ker". Using lec -- ker or lek -- ker ( on purpose not le -- cker) the hyphen may or may not appear. Is there anything beyond tria

Re: lecker lek-ker in "old" German lyrics

Hi, On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Klaus Föhl wrote: > Hello, > > Some German lyrics from before the times of Neue Deutsche Rechtschreibung > feature ck between two syllables. Without Hyphen it is "lecker", with hyphen > it is "lek-ker". Using lec -- ker or lek -- ker ( on purpose not le -- cker

Re: Repeating stanza numbers

- Original Message - From: "Laura Conrad" If someone who understands this better than I do agrees with me that this is a bug, I'll be happy to write up a real bug report, especially if you tell me what feature of lilypond to report the bug against. I've put a lot of effort into writin

Re: missing bars

Hi Katie, Use bar checks: Hope this helps! Kieren. On 2013-Mar-8, at 09:51, Katie Ganem wrote: > For some reason when I compile the file I'm working on, bars of music are > being omitted from the page.

Re: missing bars

That does help. Thank you. But now I can't seem to get music to show up when I compile it. I tried copying it into a new file, but it goes through the motions, says that it successfully compiled and then shows nothing. Does anyone know what could cause this? On Mar 8, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Kie

Re: lecker lek-ker in "old" German lyrics

On 03/08/2013 03:52 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: Hello, Some German lyrics from before the times of Neue Deutsche Rechtschreibung feature ck between two syllables. Without Hyphen it is "lecker", with hyphen it is "lek-ker". Using lec -- ker or lek -- ker ( on purpose not le -- cker)

Re: missing bars

Hi Katie, > That does help. Thank you. But now I can't seem to get music to show up > when I compile it. Are you sure you used bar checks, as I suggested? When I try it (see snippet, below), it clearly shows where your data entry errors are. Kieren. p.s. You should also be using full measur

Re: missing bars

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Katie Ganem wrote: > I tried copying it into a new file, but it goes through the motions, > says that it successfully compiled and then shows nothing. > Does anyone know what could cause this? This may happen if you define your music variables but don't actually us

Re: override stencil question

Hi David, thanks for pointing out the scm folder, I hadn't looked in there yet -- this is really helpful. the list of Scheme functions in the documentation gave me the idea that this it was a glossary -- but the scm folder seems like more the place to look for getting information. will start

Re: lecker lek-ker in "old" German lyrics

On 03/08/2013 10:19 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: On 03/08/2013 03:52 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: Hello, Some German lyrics from before the times of Neue Deutsche Rechtschreibung feature ck between two syllables. Without Hyphen it is "lecker", with hyphen it is "lek-ker". Using lec --

Re: Excellent paper on 'Copyfraud'

Mike Blackstock wrote: >This paper might be of interest to anyone typesetting public domain >music from so-called copyrighted scores: >http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244 Excellent article, even if it is 7 years old. I'm in a singing group. We sing madrigals and some baroq

Re: Excellent paper on 'Copyfraud'

On Mar 8, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Tim Slattery wrote: > Mike Blackstock wrote: > >> This paper might be of interest to anyone typesetting public domain >> music from so-called copyrighted scores: >> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244 > > Excellent article, even if it is 7 years

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

2013/3/8 Klaus Föhl : > I am somewhat unhappy with the concept behind the new default use > being \relative {...} without qualifier as it mixes absolute and relative > pitch writing within the bracket. At least as it is explained. I am not sure it mixes absolute and relative. The first note is rel

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:43 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Werner LEMBERG writes: > > >>> Well... if you just don't emit the warning if the first pitch in a > >>> \relative {} block is incorrect, then it seems like you get exactly > >>> the current proposal except that you have to spell \relative {

Re: override stencil question

2013/3/8 Rama Gottfried : > Hi David, > > thanks for pointing out the scm folder, I hadn't looked in there yet -- this > is really helpful. > > the list of Scheme functions in the documentation gave me the idea that this > it was a glossary -- but the scm folder seems like more the place to look >

Re: A plea for a documentation change ... Just a tiny one

Guy Stalnaker writes: > I've just spent an entire evening trying to figure out how to add some > lyric text to one voice of a three-measure two-voice section of a score. Thanks for contacting us about this, Guy, and for the thorough-going report. Your suggestion for a change to the docs seems

span bar not working any more?

Hello all, SpanBar isn't currently working as expected/documented: All the best, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists

Re: Orchestral group

Hi Mario, > Well! As I have already said I think that this solution is really nice but I > can not fix what I have underlined in red: that the staff bar connection. And > I can not add staff "Harpsichord" without StaffGroup and only PianoStaff :-( I can fix all the other things, but the SpanBa

Re: span bar not working any more?

Hi, Just saw . Sorry for the noise. Kieren. On 2013-Mar-8, at 20:58, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hello all, > > SpanBar isn't currently working as expected/documented: >

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

> Colin Hall gmail.com> writes: > > > In my early days with Lilypond I learned this to my cost. I've never > > used \relative since then. I stopped using \relative about a year ago, because absolute note entry is vastly easier. When writing, I do not generally remember the previous note (more l

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

It's funny. I think i have used \absolute maybe three times. It is too much extra typing. Shane On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Keith OHara wrote: >> Colin Hall gmail.com> writes: >> >> > In my early days with Lilypond I learned this to my cost. I've never >> > used \relative since then. > > I

Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

Greetings All, In truth, I am quite satisfied with the current state of \relative, whether with or without an absolute pitch indicated before the braces. And yes, I do understand that, though users are at present discouraged from using the latter, both \relative c' { MUSIC } and \relative { M

Turn placed between notes

See attached graphic. Quite a number of these in the score (Brahms Sextet Op 18). At the moment I'm creating them like so: \version "2.17.13" \relative f'' { f4.^\markup { \halign #-3.5 { \musicglyph #"scripts.turn" } } g16 a | } but with the value of halign hard coded, with differing note v

Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative

On 9/03/2013, at 12:22 am, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2013/3/8 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : >> David Kastrup writes: >> >>> Issue 3229: Patch: Make \relative { ... } interpret the first pitch as >>> an absolute one >> >> +1 > > +1 , I was currently using \relative f { } anyway, so this would > allow remo

Re: Orchestral group

In data venerdì 8 marzo 2013 22:37:02, Kieren MacMillan ha scritto: > Hope this helps! Oh yess! This is great! You are great! (H) Thank you so match! ;-)(Y) -- oiram/bin/selom Da ognuno secondo le proprie capacità ad ognuno secondo i propri bisogni. MIB-kernellinux-tester Linux MIB Lilypond

Re: Turn placed between notes

Nick Payne internode.on.net> writes: > have to fiddle with the value of halign each time to get > the turn centred between the notes. Is there a more automated way of > positioning the turn? Parallel music. Then I can think in terms of the timing of the turn, rather than the spacing. Usual