James Harkins gmail.com> writes:
> In this minimal example, there's a collision between the rehearsal and
> tempo marks. LP resolves the collision by pushing the rehearsal mark
> rather far above the staff.
> % No discernible effect, even with much larger numbers
> \override Score.Rehearsal
Sorry if it's a basic question -- my eyes are starting to glaze over
from looking at the manual.
In this minimal example, there's a collision between the rehearsal and
tempo marks. LP resolves the collision by pushing the rehearsal mark
rather far above the staff. This is a legibility issue when t
I am working on the bassoon part for Holst's First Suite, and I want to try
something that looks essentially like this:
http://pastebin.com/71RJe0YB
Except I want the last measure in the 2nd part to be hidden (There is music
later in that part but I want the rests to be gone.)
I do not know how
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> Another idea. How about:
> \once \accidentalStyle forget
Good one. That did it. Thanks!
hjh
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-use
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:09:45PM +0100, Phil Hézaine wrote:
> And what about the conversion of drum notes to midi pitches?
> I'm not able to find a way to write a specific function for that issue.
> Graham? Have you some time?
To clarify, I wasn't suggesting that drums should be converted to
mid
On 03/29/2013 06:26 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
An example came to my mind: imagine someone typesetting a score and
using one (just one) function from OLLib. Distributing whole OLLib
together with the score just to have this one functionality would be
inconvenient, so he'd like to actually paste th
On 03/29/2013 05:39 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
Now take a programming language as another example (PHP and Python are
explicitely _not_ distributed under the GPL BTW).
The interpreter is GPLed by group A, as well as some libraries.
User B writes a program in that language. This program is considered
First of all, I think we have quite a consensus on what we intend - which is a
good start.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:43:59 -0500
Tim McNamara wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2013, at 4:42 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> > On 03/28/2013 08:28 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
> >> My understanding is always been th
Thanks for this nice moment !
2013/3/29 Christ van Willegen
> Hi,
>
> I was Facebook'ed the following video. It's an oldy, but it's nice:
>
> http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=102421339943114&set=vb.15257443455&type=2&theater
>
> Christ van Willegen
> --
> 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56
Hi list,
A patch about event-listener.ly was send to:
https://codereview.appspot.com/8165043/
Phil.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I use
\override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
\override Staff.StaffSymbol #'stencil = ##f
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Hiding-staff-lines-without-barlines-hiding-tp143606p143625.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 17:21 +0100, Noeck wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> > \once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-visibility =
> > #end-of-line-visible \mark \markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.ufermata" }
>
> Instead of #end-of-line-visible you can use #begin-of-line-invisible,
> then it would be vis
Hi Richard,
> \once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-visibility = #end-of-line-visible
> \mark \markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.ufermata" }
Instead of #end-of-line-visible you can use #begin-of-line-invisible,
then it would be visible at the end and in the middle, but not at the
beginning of
I have a score with a fermata on a barline. If the barline occurs at a
line break it moves itself on to the next line over the clef there.
Digging in the manual I found I can stop it moving to position itself
over the clef on the following line with this:
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'brea
- Original Message -
From: "Eluze"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: Hiding staff lines without barlines hiding
Anna Choma wrote
Hello
How can I hide staff lines without hiding barlines? The \stopStaff
command
hids barlines either.
Removing "Staff_symbol_engra
Anna Choma wrote
> Hello
>
> How can I hide staff lines without hiding barlines? The \stopStaff command
> hids barlines either.
> Removing "Staff_symbol_engraver" does the same.
depending what you for!
try (version 2.17.14)
\stopStaff
\override Staff.StaffSymbol.color=#white
\override St
On Mar 29, 2013, at 4:42 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 08:28 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
>> My understanding is always been that the GPL applies to the software used to
>> produce a file, not to the file itself.
>
> I think (at least in this case) you mean "process", not "produce
Hello
How can I hide staff lines without hiding barlines? The \stopStaff command hids
barlines either.
Removing "Staff_symbol_engraver" does the same.
Best
Anna Choma
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
> Hi James,
>
> as far as I can see you are still _in_ cadenza with the last note, i.e.
> in _unmetered_ music.
> Inserting manual \bar "|" doesn't change this and opens _no_ new section
> of unmetered music.
> Therefore LilyPond's use of the natural is logical.
>
> To get rid of the natural you
Hi,
I was Facebook'ed the following video. It's an oldy, but it's nice:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=102421339943114&set=vb.15257443455&type=2&theater
Christ van Willegen
--
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
___
lilypond-user m
2013/3/29 James Harkins
> Ok, my manually painted \bar lines have no effect on accidentals (either
> by design, or as a side effect of a design that has other good reasons to
> be as it is).
>
Even in metered music a manually printed bar-line in the middle of a
measure has no effect on accidental
On Mar 29, 2013 7:19 PM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>> In this minimal example, it could be argued that the visible
>> cancellation makes sense. In my actual score, it doesn't: the E-flat
>> is early in the system, and the E-nat. is quite a bit later, with many
>> notes and three barlines intervening (s
2013/3/29 James Harkins
> I would like the E-natural to print here without the accidental.
>
> \version "2.16.1"
> \include "english.ly"
>
> \relative c' {
> \key g \major
>
> ef1
> g
> e1 % no explicit natural sign here
>
> \cadenzaOn
>
> ef1
> \bar "|"
> g
> \bar "|"
> e1
- Original Message -
From: "James Harkins"
To: "lily-users"
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 11:00 AM
Subject: Extraneous accidental after barline in cadenza
I would like the E-natural to print here without the accidental.
\version "2.16.1"
\include "english.ly"
\relative c' {
\key g
I would like the E-natural to print here without the accidental.
\version "2.16.1"
\include "english.ly"
\relative c' {
\key g \major
ef1
g
e1 % no explicit natural sign here
\cadenzaOn
ef1
\bar "|"
g
\bar "|"
e1 % but there is one here - I want to get rid of it
}
In thi
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> Try \set Score.proportionalNotationDuration instead.
OK, that seems to have got it.
This detail seems not to be mentioned in the NR as obviously as it
might be. It does mention that proportionalNotationDuration "lives in
the Score context," but still it escaped
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> Personally I feel it would be nice to resolve any potential ambiguity.
>
> Obviously the best way to do this is just to show that I'm definitively wrong
> in
> my interpretation (this would be nice:-),
I'd say this: without t
On 03/28/2013 08:28 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
> My understanding is always been that the GPL applies to the software used to
> produce a file, not to the file itself.
I think (at least in this case) you mean "process", not "produce".
You can draw an analogy to e.g. shell scripts, where the fact th
Ralph Palmer writes:
> Greetings -
>
> I'm running LilyPond 2.16.2 under Windows 7, SP1.
>
> I've copied the *.el files from lilypond\..\site-lisp to
> \emacs\emacs-24.3\site-lisp
> and I've set the PATH and HOME variables so that I think emacs is finding
> lilypond-mode.el, but when I open emacs
29 matches
Mail list logo
