Eluze writes:
> Paul Scott-4 wrote
>> So you believe the old ("startpitch" optional) behavior will be restored
>> after
>> the testing?
>
> no idea - I've got used to the optional start pitch myself (i.e. I
> nearly never used a pitch with my laziness); I wouldn't mind if it
> came back (also in
Paul Scott writes:
> Hi,
>
> I thought I had followed the discussion about \relative without startpitch.
>
> I liked the idea and started using it.
Uh, you started using it? The previous behavior of \relative { ... }
was to be equivalent to \relative c' { ... }, so you have been using
somethin
2013/4/1 Urs Liska
>
> OK, thanks for the information.
>
> And does anybody know how/if one can retrieve information about the existing
> (staff) context? Some property accible by Scheme?
Hi Urs,
below a possibility, though, not sure if it is really helpful.
I'm using Eluze's example and
http:
on 2013-04-02 at 00:01 Thomas Morley wrote:
> below my approach.
> Several comments in code, file and png attached.
like wow, this is indeed terrific! thank you! it'll take a while before i
understand the code enough to adapt it to my needs, but this is a great
start.
> Hope there are no proble
2013/4/1 luis jure
>
> on 2013-04-01 at 14:33 Thomas Morley wrote:
>
> > Though, while compiling the code with this built I couldn't reproduce the
> > error Luis reported.
> > What am I missing?
>
> i'm afraid i can't be of much help, i'm building lilypond on a gentoo
> linux using an ebuild (a s
2013/4/1 luis jure
>
>
> hello list, i have yet another question regarding the definition of a
> custom drumstaff, and it is how to add a custom articulation.
>
> it's actually two questions, the first one is how to make custom
> articulations available inside #define mydrums().
>
> i managed to
Paul Scott-4 wrote
> So you believe the old ("startpitch" optional) behavior will be restored
> after
> the testing?
no idea - I've got used to the optional start pitch myself (i.e. I nearly
never used a pitch with my laziness); I wouldn't mind if it came back (also
in the form of f' being the def
ouh.. :(
thank you
Lorenzo
On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:52 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> I'm sorry to tell you that this isn't possible yet.
> It seems it wouldn't be too complicated to get at least the basic content
> (without LilyPond's superior layout quality) to xml. But it hasn't been done
> yet.
>
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:09:24AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
> Paul Scott-4 wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thought I had followed the discussion about \relative without
> > startpitch.
> >
> > I liked the idea and started using it. In 2.17.15 this feature no longer
> > seems to work. I get an error.
> >
I'm sorry to tell you that this isn't possible yet.
It seems it wouldn't be too complicated to get at least the basic content
(without LilyPond's superior layout quality) to xml. But it hasn't been done
yet.
Urs
lorenzo bianchi schrieb:
>hi all
>
>i'm really sorry if the thing i would like
Paul Scott-4 wrote
>
> It's not mandatory in 2.17.14. It works quite well.
but in 2.17.15 it is as the links I sent explain!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/relative-in-2-17-15-tp143745p143752.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nab
hi all
i'm really sorry if the thing i would like to discuss is a very discussed
topic.
i made a lot of searches on the net trying to understand if it is possible to
export the lilypond score in order to import it in FInale or Sibelius (xml)
I found just the Midi option which is trivial opti
OK, thanks for the information.
And does anybody know how/if one can retrieve information about the existing
(staff) context? Some property accible by Scheme?
Eluze schrieb:
>Urs Liska-4 wrote
>> Of course I'm also talking about PianoStaves with more than two
>staves in
>> it.
>> BTW does \c
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:09:24AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
> Paul Scott-4 wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thought I had followed the discussion about \relative without
> > startpitch.
> >
> > I liked the idea and started using it. In 2.17.15 this feature no longer
> > seems to work. I get an error.
> >
Paul Scott-4 wrote
> Hi,
>
> I thought I had followed the discussion about \relative without
> startpitch.
>
> I liked the idea and started using it. In 2.17.15 this feature no longer
> seems to work. I get an error.
>
> What did I miss?
yes, it's mandatory to use a pitch after \relative, s
Urs Liska-4 wrote
> Of course I'm also talking about PianoStaves with more than two staves in
> it.
> BTW does \change Staff work only in the context of a PianoStaff (can't
> check that ATM)?
it should work with any staff-grouper
here is an example where the "melody" jumps from one staff to the o
Hi,
I thought I had followed the discussion about \relative without startpitch.
I liked the idea and started using it. In 2.17.15 this feature no longer
seems to work. I get an error.
What did I miss?
Thanks,
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user mail
Thank you - that worked nicely. Denemo now has a hide accidental
command :)
Richard
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:50 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> 2013/4/1 Richard Shann
> On a different topic you helpfully suggested:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 12:58 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
> > Y
> I'm not top posting.
It seems that \RemoveEmptyStaves doesn't play very well with the
ambitus_engraver.
In this example, I'm trying to get the treble staff removed in the
first two systems, and appear with an ambitus on the third.
It is removed correctly in the first system. But reappears in
Alberto Simões-2 wrote
> On 01/04/13 13:43, Alberto Simões wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/04/13 13:41, Alberto Simões wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/04/13 13:26, Alberto Simões wrote:
\cadenzaOn
\stopStaff
\break
\once {
\override Score.BarNumber.stencil=##f
on 2013-04-01 at 14:33 Thomas Morley wrote:
> Though, while compiling the code with this built I couldn't reproduce the
> error Luis reported.
> What am I missing?
i'm afraid i can't be of much help, i'm building lilypond on a gentoo
linux using an ebuild (a script used by gentoo to fetch source
On 01/04/13 13:43, Alberto Simões wrote:
On 01/04/13 13:41, Alberto Simões wrote:
On 01/04/13 13:26, Alberto Simões wrote:
\cadenzaOn
\stopStaff
\break
\once {
\override Score.BarNumber.stencil=##f
\override StaffSymbol.line-count=#0
\override TextScript.
On 01/04/13 13:41, Alberto Simões wrote:
On 01/04/13 13:26, Alberto Simões wrote:
\cadenzaOn
\stopStaff
\break
\once {
\override Score.BarNumber.stencil=##f
\override StaffSymbol.line-count=#0
\override TextScript.staff-padding=#'()
\override KeySignat
hello list, i have yet another question regarding the definition of a
custom drumstaff, and it is how to add a custom articulation.
it's actually two questions, the first one is how to make custom
articulations available inside #define mydrums().
i managed to do that adding a custom articulati
On 01/04/13 13:26, Alberto Simões wrote:
\cadenzaOn
\stopStaff
\break
\once {
\override Score.BarNumber.stencil=##f
\override StaffSymbol.line-count=#0
\override TextScript.staff-padding=#'()
\override KeySignature.stencil=##f
\override Score.Clef.s
2013/4/1 Phil Holmes
> **
> It's not obvious, but this page should help:
>
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor/compiling-regression-tests
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Thomas Morley
> *To:* Neil Puttock
> *Cc:* lilypond-user
> *Sent
On 01/04/13 13:02, Eluze wrote:
Eluze wrote
Alberto Simões-2 wrote
Hello
Although I can add manually text binding it to a note with
^\markup{...}, how can I add an annotation to be placed exactly in the
center of the page, between two staves?
The manual refers a "Separate Text", but it is
It's not obvious, but this page should help:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor/compiling-regression-tests
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Morley
To: Neil Puttock
Cc: lilypond-user
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: fo
Eluze wrote
>
> Alberto Simões-2 wrote
>> Hello
>>
>> Although I can add manually text binding it to a note with
>> ^\markup{...}, how can I add an annotation to be placed exactly in the
>> center of the page, between two staves?
>>
>> The manual refers a "Separate Text", but it is placed betw
2013/3/31 Neil Puttock
> On 31 March 2013 12:05, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I downloaded 2.17.15 this morning and tried to compile my code, again: no
> > problem.
> > Perhaps some copy/paste error?
> > To be sure, I've attached the file.
>
> Your code does naughty things inside a c
Thanks for the idea, but I'm looking for a generic solution tha doesn't rely on
given staff names.
Best
Urs
Vaughan McAlley schrieb:
>On 31 March 2013 22:36, Urs Liska wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to refer to a staff relative to the current staff and
>not by its name?
>>
>> So, is it possibl
2013/4/1 Richard Shann
> On a different topic you helpfully suggested:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 12:58 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
> > You can use
> >
> >
> > suppressAccidental = {
> >
> > \once \override Accidental #'stencil = ##f
> >
> > }
> I notice this can't be used on notes inside chords - I've
on 2013-04-01 at 08:20 Marc Hohl wrote:
> the rest of the function remains unaffected.
ok, now i see. for the benefit of the archives, i confirm that the full
example below works to perfection with lilypond-2.17.15. no errors, and
the output is exactly what i wanted.
thank you all!
lj
\ver
Eluze schrieb:
>Urs Liska-4 wrote
>> Is it possible to refer to a staff relative to the current staff and
>not
>> by its name?
>>
>> So, is it possible to write something like
>>
>> \change Staff = "previous/next or "higher/lower"
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> \change Staff = "Explicit-name-of-
On a different topic you helpfully suggested:
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 12:58 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
> You can use
>
>
> suppressAccidental = {
>
> \once \override Accidental #'stencil = ##f
>
> }
I notice this can't be used on notes inside chords - I've been looking
at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2
On 31 March 2013 22:36, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Is it possible to refer to a staff relative to the current staff and not by
> its name?
>
> So, is it possible to write something like
>
> \change Staff = "previous/next or "higher/lower"
>
> instead of
>
> \change Staff = "Explicit-name-of-staff"
>
>
Hi,
Would anybody be willing to adapt the lilypond software so that we can see
the musical scores in the CEST system ?
In the link bellow you can find a summary of the system.
http://wwwae.ciemat.es/~fernand/musicacest/summary_cest_system.doc
(spanish :
http://wwwae.ciemat.es/~fernand/musicaces
2013/4/1 Eluze :
> Alberto Simões-2 wrote
>> Hello
>>
>> Although I can add manually text binding it to a note with
>> ^\markup{...}, how can I add an annotation to be placed exactly in the
>> center of the page, between two staves?
>>
>> The manual refers a "Separate Text", but it is placed betwee
Urs Liska-4 wrote
> Is it possible to refer to a staff relative to the current staff and not
> by its name?
>
> So, is it possible to write something like
>
> \change Staff = "previous/next or "higher/lower"
>
> instead of
>
> \change Staff = "Explicit-name-of-staff"
>
> inside a PianoStaff?
Alberto Simões-2 wrote
> Hello
>
> Although I can add manually text binding it to a note with
> ^\markup{...}, how can I add an annotation to be placed exactly in the
> center of the page, between two staves?
>
> The manual refers a "Separate Text", but it is placed between scores,
> and I wou
Nick Payne-3 wrote
> See example below. The chord across two voices has the accidental next
> to the notehead. Add an arpeggio and the accidental and arpeggio both
> get spaced away to the left. How do I move the accidental back next to
> the notehead?
thanks, Nick
I've added
https://code.goog
41 matches
Mail list logo
