Re: many users don't know about \shape

Janek Warchoł writes: > 2013/5/10 David Kastrup : >> Janek Warchoł writes: >>> I'm wondering whether we should advertise \shape more. It's >>> tremendously helpful, and yet despite it had been added ~1 year ago >>> (IIRC) many users don't know about it. >> >> I'm somewhat dubious about "tremend

Re: many users don't know about \shape

Hi, 2013/5/10 David Kastrup : > Janek Warchoł writes: >> I'm wondering whether we should advertise \shape more. It's >> tremendously helpful, and yet despite it had been added ~1 year ago >> (IIRC) many users don't know about it. > > I'm somewhat dubious about "tremendously helpful" as it defeat

Re: Expansion of score for different format

Sorry about that, read the first part of what you provided, not all. I just figured it out. I was essentially outputting sequentially instead of simultaneously. I didn't figure it out until I added about two or three copies of the music to run the lyrics out. The stripped-down function is: seqVe

Re: Expansion of score for different format

Carl Peterson writes: > I've made a little bit of progress: I've changed the code to: > > #(define > (make-my-scores parser location lyrics) > (if (not (null? lyrics)) > #{ $(car lyrics) > $(make-my-scores parser location (cdr lyrics)) > #} > ) > ) Looks like you could just write #(define (make

Re: Expansion of score for different format

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Carl Peterson wrote: > Premature sending... > > As I was saying, the problem with the below code is that it prints the first > verse, but it only prints the first verse. I also simplified the code so > that instead of just passing lyrics in the list structure, each

Re: Expansion of score for different format

Premature sending... As I was saying, the problem with the below code is that it prints the first verse, but it only prints the first verse. I also simplified the code so that instead of just passing lyrics in the list structure, each list element is one or more Lyrics blocks. On Fri, May 10, 20

Re: Expansion of score for different format

I've made a little bit of progress: I've changed the code to: #(define (make-my-scores parser location lyrics) (if (not (null? lyrics)) #{ $(car lyrics) $(make-my-scores parser location (cdr lyrics)) #} ) ) seqVerses = #(define-void-function (parser location up down title composer passage meter

Set midi volume per voice?

Hi list, Is it possible to set the volume of the midi tracks for each different track? Till now I have: one = { a b c d } two = { d e f g } global = { \key b \minor } \score { \new Staff << \new Voice = vone { \voiceOne << \global \one >> } \new Voice = vtwo { \voiceTwo << \global

Re: Expansion of score for different format

Okay, so I've been fairly successful in implementing and tweaking. I'm working on the complementary function, to output a regular score with stacked verses for book layout. Here is my re-arrangement: #(define (make-my-scores parser location lyrics) (if (not (null? lyrics)) (let* ( #{ \new Lyrics

RE: Cadenza alignment

Nathan: Thank you for your reply and the correction – not ugly at all especially since it works! Mark From: Nathan [mailto:when.possi...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 8:55 AM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: LilyPond Users Subject: Re: Cadenza alignment On Fri, May 10, 2013 at

Re: Cadenza alignment

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Hello: > > ** ** > > A small cadenza appears at the end of a piano piece (see attached file).** > ** > > The “des2.” in the treble should be in the next measure. > > The error message is: “barcheck failed at: 1/2 ees2\trill\ferm

Re: many users don't know about \shape

On 10/05/13 15:40, Urs Liska wrote: Am 10.05.2013 16:36, schrieb Alberto Simões: On 10/05/13 15:27, David Kastrup wrote: Alberto Simões writes: For those interested in the \shape usage, this is what I was working in: http://www.musica-liturgica.net/viewfull.pl/375 I'd probably not le

Cadenza alignment

Hello: A small cadenza appears at the end of a piano piece (see attached file). The "des2." in the treble should be in the next measure. The error message is: "barcheck failed at: 1/2 ees2\trill\fermata|." How do I correct this? Thank you for your kind attention. Mark \version "2

Re: many users don't know about \shape

Am 10.05.2013 16:36, schrieb Alberto Simões: On 10/05/13 15:27, David Kastrup wrote: Alberto Simões writes: For those interested in the \shape usage, this is what I was working in: http://www.musica-liturgica.net/viewfull.pl/375 I'd probably not let the one voice jump around staves so

Re: many users don't know about \shape

On 10/05/13 15:27, David Kastrup wrote: Alberto Simões writes: For those interested in the \shape usage, this is what I was working in: http://www.musica-liturgica.net/viewfull.pl/375 I'd probably not let the one voice jump around staves so much. Just keep it in the top staff, typesetti

Re: ballooning a note including its attributes

2013/5/10 Jean-Charles Malahieude : > Hi all, > > I need, for an examination paper, to add a ballooning over two consecutive > notes. So far, so good I can play with the slopes, but how can I adapt the > engraver to include the accidental (in other words emphasize the C-sharp, > not just the C) and

Re: many users don't know about \shape

Alberto Simões writes: > For those interested in the \shape usage, this is what I was working in: > http://www.musica-liturgica.net/viewfull.pl/375 I'd probably not let the one voice jump around staves so much. Just keep it in the top staff, typesetting it with \voiceFour instead of \voiceTwo

Re: many users don't know about \shape

On 10/05/13 14:55, David Kastrup wrote: Alberto Simões writes: On 10/05/13 14:42, David Nalesnik wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alberto Simões mailto:al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt>> wrote: Probably the fact that I am running 2.16. Updating. \shape will in fact work with 2

Re: many users don't know about \shape

Alberto Simões writes: > On 10/05/13 14:42, David Nalesnik wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alberto Simões >> mailto:al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt>> >> wrote: >> >> >> Probably the fact that I am running 2.16. Updating. >> >> >> \shape will in fact work with 2.16. You just need

Re: many users don't know about \shape

Janek Warchoł writes: > I'm wondering whether we should advertise \shape more. It's > tremendously helpful, and yet despite it had been added ~1 year ago > (IIRC) many users don't know about it. I'm somewhat dubious about "tremendously helpful" as it defeats automated typesetting. And "had bee

Re: many users don't know about \shape

On 10/05/13 14:42, David Nalesnik wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alberto Simões mailto:al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt>> wrote: Probably the fact that I am running 2.16. Updating. \shape will in fact work with 2.16. You just need to use a different ordering of the arguments: \

Re: many users don't know about \shape

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alberto Simões < al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt> wrote: > > > Probably the fact that I am running 2.16. Updating. \shape will in fact work with 2.16. You just need to use a different ordering of the arguments: \shape Slur #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0)) (The

Re: many users don't know about \shape

2013/5/10 Alberto Simões : > > > On 10/05/13 14:29, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> 2013/5/10 Alberto Simões : >>> >>> >>> On 10/05/13 14:17, Urs Liska wrote: Am 10.05.2013 15:15, schrieb Alberto Simões: > > >>> The snippet in >>> http:/

Re: Not working snippet

David Nalesnik writes: > Drawing systems..._.ly:13:16: While evaluating arguments > to cdr in > expression (cdr $offsets): > _.ly:13:16: Unbound variable: $offsets > > If the snipped had a version... :-) > > Well, the LSR runs under 2.14.0.

Re: many users don't know about \shape

On 10/05/13 14:34, Alberto Simões wrote: On 10/05/13 14:29, Janek Warchoł wrote: Hi, 2013/5/10 Alberto Simões : On 10/05/13 14:17, Urs Liska wrote: Am 10.05.2013 15:15, schrieb Alberto Simões: The snippet in http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/__Snippet?id=748 And

Re: many users don't know about \shape

On 10/05/13 14:29, Janek Warchoł wrote: Hi, 2013/5/10 Alberto Simões : On 10/05/13 14:17, Urs Liska wrote: Am 10.05.2013 15:15, schrieb Alberto Simões: The snippet in http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/__Snippet?id=748 And unfortunately it doesn't work pretty well o

many users don't know about \shape

Hi, 2013/5/10 Alberto Simões : > > On 10/05/13 14:17, Urs Liska wrote: >> >> Am 10.05.2013 15:15, schrieb Alberto Simões: >>> > The snippet in > http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/__Snippet?id=748 >>> >>> And unfortunately it doesn't work pretty well on cross-staff slurs.

Re: DevNull produces strange output

2012/10/29 David Kastrup : > The definition of Devnull is > > \context { > \name "Devnull" > \type "Engraver_group" > > %% don't want to route anything out of here: > \alias "Staff" > \alias "Voice" > \description "Silently discards all musical information given to this > context." > } >

Re: Not working snippet

On 10/05/13 14:17, Urs Liska wrote: Am 10.05.2013 15:15, schrieb Alberto Simões: Hello The snippet in http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/__Snippet?id=748 doesn't seem to work -- referenced from

Re: Not working snippet

Am 10.05.2013 15:15, schrieb Alberto Simões: Hello The snippet in http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/__Snippet?id=748 doesn't seem to work -- referenced from http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LS

Re: Not working snippet

Hello The snippet in http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/__Snippet?id=748 doesn't seem to work -- referenced from http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/__Item?id=748

Re: Not working snippet

On 10/05/13 14:11, David Nalesnik wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Alberto Simões mailto:al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt>> wrote: On 10/05/13 14:05, Thomas Morley wrote: 2013/5/10 Alberto Simões mailto:al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt>__>: Hello Th

Re: Not working snippet

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Alberto Simões < al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt> wrote: > > > On 10/05/13 14:05, Thomas Morley wrote: > >> 2013/5/10 Alberto Simões : >> >>> Hello >>> >>> The snippet in >>> >>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/**Snippet?id=748

Re: Not working snippet

On 10/05/13 14:05, Thomas Morley wrote: 2013/5/10 Alberto Simões : Hello The snippet in http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=748 doesn't seem to work -- referenced from http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=748 This is the complain: Drawing systems..._.ly:13:16: While evaluating argum

Re: Not working snippet

2013/5/10 Alberto Simões : > Hello > > The snippet in > http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=748 > doesn't seem to work -- referenced from > http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=748 > > This is the complain: > > Drawing systems..._.ly:13:16: While evaluating arguments to cdr in > expression (c

Not working snippet

Hello The snippet in http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=748 doesn't seem to work -- referenced from http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=748 This is the complain: Drawing systems..._.ly:13:16: While evaluating arguments to cdr in expression (cdr $offsets): _.ly:13:16: Unbound variable:

Re: Cross-staff tie

Alberto Simões writes: > On 10/05/13 12:40, Urs Liska wrote: >> Am 10.05.2013 13:33, schrieb Eluze: >>> << >>>\new Staff=A { c'1( \change Staff=B c')} >>>\new Staff=B { \clef bass R1 R } >> What Eluze wants to say is >> a) you can't do this with a tie but you have to use a slur instead >

ballooning a note including its attributes

Hi all, I need, for an examination paper, to add a ballooning over two consecutive notes. So far, so good I can play with the slopes, but how can I adapt the engraver to include the accidental (in other words emphasize the C-sharp, not just the C) and add some padding between the object and t

Re: Cross-staff tie

On 10/05/13 12:40, Urs Liska wrote: Am 10.05.2013 13:33, schrieb Eluze: << \new Staff=A { c'1( \change Staff=B c')} \new Staff=B { \clef bass R1 R } What Eluze wants to say is a) you can't do this with a tie but you have to use a slur instead OK. That was probably the doubt I should h

Re: Cross-staff tie

Am 10.05.2013 13:33, schrieb Eluze: << \new Staff=A { c'1( \change Staff=B c')} \new Staff=B { \clef bass R1 R } What Eluze wants to say is a) you can't do this with a tie but you have to use a slur instead b) musically it is probably one voice. I can't judge from the small example if this

Re: Cross-staff tie

Alberto Simões-2 wrote > Hello > > Can anybody point me to what is the best way to achieve this cross-staff > tie? > > Specially because it doesn't seem to be the same "voice" crossing the > staff. why would this be another voice? (if it weren't it would not have to cross staves!) << \new St

Cross-staff tie

Hello Can anybody point me to what is the best way to achieve this cross-staff tie? Specially because it doesn't seem to be the same "voice" crossing the staff. Best, Alberto <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.o