Actually I was thinking the variables for the piano since one of the sections
repeats a lot in the right hand. Will all of that still compile if I have the
files's variables like that or do I need to then create a veritable for the
foe itself?
On May 23, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrot
Wim van Dommelen writes:
> Yes, that is possible if I understand correctly what you want to do.
> For example you can make a set of files:
> - clarinet-1.ly, contains the variable with the notes and everything
> for clarinet 1
> - hobo.ly, the variable with the notes for the hobo, etc.
Is that
Hi Sarah,
On 23 May 2013, at 19:46 , Sarah k Alawami wrote:
I was thinking of putting my variables in each file
each variable only *once* in a file, I presume
that way I can do a bit less less typing, at least in that file.
will this still work in the end when I compile all files in to o
David,
This is amazing. I was able to drop this into my own project without any
trouble except changing the lyrics context command to reflect me using 2.16
instead of 2.17. Kudos.
Cheers,
Carl
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:06 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Well, comparing the lengths of strings is a
k-ohara5a5a wrote
> Michael Rivers
>
> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> In this excerpt from a piece I'm typesetting, the first two arpeggios are
>> fine, but the third collides with the previous note in the right hand's
>> upper voice. Is there a way to avoid the collision?
>>
>
> When you need more
Aha this is the way into the new steinbergs music engraving sistem.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Michael Rivers wrote:
> I saw that too. It's bolder and more "engraved" looking than the other
> commercial music fonts, at least. I don't know what to think about the new
> music font format.
>
>
There seems to be a lot of odds and ends missing in it. Particularly in the
Chant notation, and time signature areas. I like the font in and of itself
what I see of it. The whole idea of Smufl probably would be better served
if it was not a "conscript" style encoding project. Eventually the Unicode
I saw that too. It's bolder and more "engraved" looking than the other
commercial music fonts, at least. I don't know what to think about the new
music font format.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bravura-new-font-tp146234p146235.html
Sent from the User ma
Hello everyone,
I stumbled upon this article today,
http://blog.steinberg.net/2013/05/introducing-bravura-music-font/
Thoughts?
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bravura-new-font-tp146234.html
Sent from the User mailin
I was thinking of putting my variables in each file that way I can do a bit
less less typing, at least in that file. will this still work in the end when
I compile all files in to one score and parts for the choir and me and the
pianist? Well, I won't need the score, how ever the person conduc
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Emil Salim wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Greetings from Jakarta, Indonesia. This is the first time I post to the
> list. I would like to typeset the chants here (as presented in The Hymnal
> 1982 of ECUSA):
>
> https://www.riteseries.org/low_res/S/S109/S109_watermark.gif
2013/5/23 Pierre Perol-Schneider
>
>
> I'll think about something better and come back to you.
>
Nothing magical came...
Maybe add :
\override ClusterSpanner #'padding = #0.01
to get a better look...
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.o
Thomas Morley writes:
> To the author of LSR-snippet 878: Customizing individual staff lines
> (currently not approved)
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=878
> Hope you're on this list.
>
> I had a look at your file and noticed a small gap when the normal
> staff is restored. Visible with hig
To the author of LSR-snippet 878: Customizing individual staff lines
(currently not approved)
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=878
Hope you're on this list.
I had a look at your file and noticed a small gap when the normal
staff is restored. Visible with high zoom.
What do you think about the
2013/5/23 Emil Salim
>
> I've succeeded in removing the staff lines, adding the \divisioMinima
> etc., but I couldn't find a way to typeset the long block for the repeated
> note. Could someone help me? Thank you kindly.
>
>
Hi Emil,
Well, here's a simple solution that's far from perfect, but cam
15 matches
Mail list logo
