If you're not confortable with the Terminal and use Texworks, you have to
tell to Texworks with command to run: lilypond-book in place of pdflatex (or
pdfxelatex etc. according to your usual LaTeX choice).
In Texworks, go to the Preferences, in the "Typesetting" tab.
In "Path for Tex...", add the
I'm somewhat split in this question:
I very much like stackexchange and use it as a resource for latex, git and
python questions regularly.
Finding answers to Lilypond questions there would be nice too.
But I think the user base of Lilypond is significantly smaller than of the
other mentiones t
Gilberto Agostinho writes:
> I am also totally up for this idea as well.
What's wrong with this list? Everybody wants to take his LilyPond
business to the web interface of his choice that takes a lot of
additional work over just reading and typing text and further dilutes
the LilyPond knowledge
Joshua Nichols writes:
>>JoshTeX systems are not required or intended to recognize either lilypond
> or
>>lilypond-book.
>
> I understood this. But from what I can see in the documentation, my problem
> isn't addressed in the lilypond documentation
>
>>What particularly was your problem in applyi
2013/11/2 Francisco Vila :
> Hello. I bring this from the Spanish list:
>
> {
> \time 2/4
> \repeat percent 3 << b'2 \\ b2 >>
> \repeat percent 3 b2
> }
>
> [image attached]
>
> Here, the repeated part which has polyphony lacks one of the percent
> symbols. Anyone knows why? Thanks.
>
> --
>
I am also totally up for this idea as well. I have been posting some
questions and answers related to LilyPond programming on the Stack Overflow
website, but unfortunately there are too few people dealing with LilyPond
over there. Stack Exchange also has a website called Musical Practice &
Performa
All,
Is there a way to tell LilyPond to try to space lyrics evenly, as opposed
to spacing notes roughly proportionally? I'm working with an SATB hymn
sheet where there are dotted half notes and quarter notes and eighth notes
all together, and the normal spacing engine that gives more space to long
It seems like a good many people support the idea. Thanks Noeck for that
link--it seems like many supported it back then. It doesn't seem like too
much work to create a page. I have created a proposal for it:
http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/61575/lilypond
I have also created a generic s
I am very much in favour of it, see this post from *exactly* one year ago:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-11/msg00018.html
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l
I know that AskUbuntu is WONDERFUL--it is the webpage that helped me breech
the gap between being a newbie to a confident user in Ubuntu. A LilyPond
page would be tremendous not only to new users but also for archiving
information. Yes, the mailing list is excellent, but for someone who is
absolute
Hello Ryan:
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 16:30 -0700, ryanmichaelmcclure wrote:
> What are your thoughts about creating a LilyPond Stack
> Exchange page?
I have found the LaTex Stack Exchange very useful. I think that
LilyPond would definitely benefit from a Stack Exchange-type website.
I don't mean
Hello. I bring this from the Spanish list:
{
\time 2/4
\repeat percent 3 << b'2 \\ b2 >>
\repeat percent 3 b2
}
[image attached]
Here, the repeated part which has polyphony lacks one of the percent
symbols. Anyone knows why? Thanks.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , ww
I'm not sure if many of you are familiar with Stack Exchange. However, to
those who are--What are your thoughts about creating a LilyPond Stack
Exchange page? I personally love the concept of Stack Exchange, and I
believe that it would be great for the LilyPond community.
-
Ryan McClure
Lun
>JoshTeX systems are not required or intended to recognize either lilypond
or
>lilypond-book.
I understood this. But from what I can see in the documentation, my problem
isn't addressed in the lilypond documentation
>What particularly was your problem in applying this to your case?
I don't know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 02:56:17 +
Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/13 8:47 AM, "Renato" wrote:
>
> >However I have not been able to (due to my superficial knowledge of
> >lilypond and snippets dealing with "chord diagrams over a
> >staff" scen
For me, it does not occur with 2.17 versions (.9 and .26) but only with
2.16.2.
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Thanks for the suggestion Peter, it indeed works very well!
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Two-possible-ugly-bugs-tp152672p153211.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user ma
David Kastrup writes:
> No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to
> convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert.
Nice. How did you come by this one?
Greetings, Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofS
On 11/01/2013 09:32 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to
convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert.
Ok!
At first I thought it was an easter egg, but so close to Halloween it
must be a bug!
Best
Peter
___
Peter Bjuhr writes:
> On 11/01/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
>>
>> On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one.
>>>
>> Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-)
>>
> I guess it must be related to the creation of the postsc
On 11/01/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one.
Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-)
I guess it must be related to the creation of the postscript...(?)
Best
Peter
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Peter Bjuhr writes:
>
> > On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> >> Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file
> >> will be?
> >>
> > Is the surprising output related to this?
> >> If an included file is g
On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one.
Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-)
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis
Peter Bjuhr writes:
> On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file
>> will be?
>>
> Is the surprising output related to this?
>> If an included file is given a name which is the same as one in
>> LilyPond's installation fil
On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file
will be?
Is the surprising output related to this?
If an included file is given a name which is the same as one in
LilyPond's installation files, LilyPond's file from the instal
Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file
will be?
\markup \center-align { hoi hoo }
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Helge Kruse writes:
> C:\lybook>lilypond-book --output=out --pdf demo.lytex
> Usage: lilypond-book [OPTION]... FILE
>
> Process LilyPond snippets in hybrid HTML, LaTeX, texinfo or DocBook
> document.
I seem to remember that Windows does something weird with = on the
command line. You either nee
Am 01.11.2013 16:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
Joshua Nichols writes:
Somewhat related: How in the world do I invoke lilypond or
lilypond-book in LaTeX, or TexWorks?
I don't know TexWorks, and one does not invoke lilypond or lilypond-book
in LaTeX. lilypond-book converts a .lytex files into im
Robert Schmaus writes:
> Hi Keith,
>
> thanks for your reply!
>
>>> May I ask what the reasons were for
>>> removing that technique?
>>
>> Probably, no-one watching the changes knew that this was a technique.
>
> that would be a pity!
LilyPond can't support everything which people consider "a te
Joshua Nichols writes:
> Somewhat related: How in the world do I invoke lilypond or
> lilypond-book in LaTeX, or TexWorks?
I don't know TexWorks, and one does not invoke lilypond or lilypond-book
in LaTeX. lilypond-book converts a .lytex files into images and a
normal LaTeX .tex file which can
I've tried using the terminal, I cannot get anything to pull up. Truth be
told, however, I feel a bit turned around. But your help and support is
wonderful, and I will keep hacking at it until I can get something to work.
There were examples scrubbed in the mailing list that I was not able to
look
31 matches
Mail list logo