Re: LilyPond meeting 2014?

2014-07-07 Thread Thomas Morley
2014-07-07 16:24 GMT+02:00 Janek Warchoł : > Hi all, > > It's been almost two years since the Waltrop 2012 LilyPond Meeting, in > which i had the pleasure to participate. What about organizing > another meeting this year? > > - who'd be interested? > - where? (David, are you interested in being th

Re: LilyPond meeting 2014?

2014-07-07 Thread Urs Liska
On 7. Juli 2014 17:19:50 MESZ, David Kastrup wrote: >Urs Liska writes: > >>> On 7. Juli 2014 16:24:34 MESZ, "Janek Warchoł" > wrote: Hi all, It's been almost two years since the Waltrop 2012 LilyPond Meeting, >in which i had the pleasure to participate. What about organizing >

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

2014-07-07 Thread Urs Liska
On 7. Juli 2014 16:48:44 MESZ, Paul Morris wrote: >Uns Liska wrote >> Hm, I think I _must not_ start with such a script right now, since I >> know that this - although being not too complex - will eat up too >much >> of my time and concentration. >> >> But your message triggered a little bit

Re: LilyPond meeting 2014?

2014-07-07 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: >> On 7. Juli 2014 16:24:34 MESZ, "Janek Warchoł" >> wrote: >>>Hi all, >>> >>>It's been almost two years since the Waltrop 2012 LilyPond Meeting, in >>>which i had the pleasure to participate. What about organizing >>>another meeting this year? >>> >>>- who'd be interested? >

Re: LilyPond meeting 2014?

2014-07-07 Thread Federico Bruni
2014-07-07 16:24 GMT+02:00 Janek Warchoł : > Hi all, > > It's been almost two years since the Waltrop 2012 LilyPond Meeting, in > which i had the pleasure to participate. What about organizing > another meeting this year? > > - who'd be interested? > - where? (David, are you interested in being t

Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

2014-07-07 Thread Paul Morris
Uns Liska wrote > Hm, I think I _must not_ start with such a script right now, since I > know that this - although being not too complex - will eat up too much > of my time and concentration. > > But your message triggered a little bit of thought, and I came to the > conclusion that we should u

Re: LilyPond meeting 2014?

2014-07-07 Thread Urs Liska
I'll be definitely unavailable Aug 10-24. This doesn't mean that other dates would work, but that's what I can say right now. Apart from that I have an idea about a beautiful and appropriate location in Stuttgart I could ask for. I'd be more than happy to join this year, but I can't promise any

LilyPond meeting 2014?

2014-07-07 Thread Janek Warchoł
Hi all, It's been almost two years since the Waltrop 2012 LilyPond Meeting, in which i had the pleasure to participate. What about organizing another meeting this year? - who'd be interested? - where? (David, are you interested in being the host again?) - when? (i suggest 15-17 August) If the m

Re: frescobaldi meta key?

2014-07-07 Thread Abel Cheung
It depends on the platform. For example, on Windows this is usually the Windows key if available. Maybe you can tell us what platform you're using? On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Gerard McConnell wrote: > Hi, the default keyboard shortcut for toggling the music view on/off uses > the META key.

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

2014-07-07 Thread Urs Liska
Am 07.07.2014 12:01, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: Am 07.07.2014 11:46, schrieb Urs Liska: I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated accord

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

2014-07-07 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
Am 07.07.2014 11:46, schrieb Urs Liska: >> I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the >> right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up >> with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated >> according to the path they are stored in. >

frescobaldi meta key?

2014-07-07 Thread Gerard McConnell
Hi, the default keyboard shortcut for toggling the music view on/off uses the META key. Which key is that?Is is possible to maximise/restore the music view? Thanks, Gerard ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/ma

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

2014-07-07 Thread Urs Liska
Am 07.07.2014 11:37, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: Hi Urs and all, I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated according to the path they are

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

2014-07-07 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
Hi Urs and all, I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated according to the path they are stored in. Should we have a dedicated folder fo

Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

2014-07-07 Thread Urs Liska
Am 07.07.2014 10:37, schrieb Urs Liska: Am 07.07.2014 09:55, schrieb Urs Liska: Maybe we can have a compromise. A script parsing the content of the tags field from all files shouldn't be hard to write. So we could: - agree upon an initial set of categories - agree upon a naming convention for ta

Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

2014-07-07 Thread Urs Liska
Am 07.07.2014 09:55, schrieb Urs Liska: Maybe we can have a compromise. A script parsing the content of the tags field from all files shouldn't be hard to write. So we could: - agree upon an initial set of categories - agree upon a naming convention for tags (e.g. the same dashed-lowercase-sch

Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

2014-07-07 Thread Urs Liska
Am 06.07.2014 17:15, schrieb Paul Morris: Uns Liska wrote Starting by tagging the existing snippets sounds fine to me. But not tagging directly but collecting suggestions first. Then decide about a set of tags and apply them during the move. Ok, sure. Something to consider: since you are pl