Thomas Morley writes:
> 2014-07-30 14:39 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> may I ask you to have a look?
>>>
>>> There's an optional argument failing with a single use-case and I've
>>> no clue why.
>>> Did I something wrong?
>>>
>>> (You may want to ski
Richard Shann rshann.plus.com> writes:
> I see that baseline-skip is affecting the size of the white triangle,
> which doesn't seem to be what's in the documentation.
The \triangle has behaved that way since its original introduction, at
2005-05-04
* ly/chord-modifiers-init.ly (blackTria
2014-07-30 21:19 GMT+02:00 Martyn Quick :
> music = {
> \set restrainOpenStrings = ##t
> \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #12
> \relative a' {
> r2 c16 ( \glissando b )
> \bendOn \bendGrace g' ( a8 ) ( \bendGrace g ) ( a ) \bendGrace g ( a )
> |
> \bendGrace g ( a4 ) \bendGrace \preBe
2014-07-30 17:27 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann :
> Dear List,
>
> I'm trying to write customized chord symbols, for better visibility when
> chord charts are displayed on smartphones. In this example I am trying
> to place an "m" above a white triangle after the chord name.
> I see that baseline-skip is
2014-07-30 14:39 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> may I ask you to have a look?
>>
>> There's an optional argument failing with a single use-case and I've
>> no clue why.
>> Did I something wrong?
>>
>> (You may want to skip most of the mail and go to the REMA
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I'm typesetting some madrigals from book 2 of the Musica Transalpina.
> Part of one of them has the passage attached. This looks like a brief 3/2
> passage that reverts to 4/4 (or their perfect/imperfect mensural
> equivalents).
>
> I'd like
2014-07-30 20:47 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2014-07-30 0:54 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>>> Janek Warchoł writes:
As i said, defining new instrument contexts is very cheap - you can just do
\newInstrument "ViolinI" "Violin" "StaffGroup"\with { }
I've been using the string bending snippets as found on the following link:
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/tree/master/notation-snippets/guitar-string-bending
... and have just produced a strange error that I don't understand. The error
says:
Drawing systems./../benddefs.ily:203
Janek Warchoł writes:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-07-30 0:54 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>> Janek Warchoł writes:
>>> As i said, defining new instrument contexts is very cheap - you can just do
>>>
>>> \newInstrument "ViolinI" "Violin" "StaffGroup"\with { } \with { }
>>> \newInstrument "ViolinII" "Violin" "Sta
Hi,
2014-07-30 0:54 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> As i said, defining new instrument contexts is very cheap - you can just do
>>
>> \newInstrument "ViolinI" "Violin" "StaffGroup"\with { } \with { }
>> \newInstrument "ViolinII" "Violin" "StaffGroup"\with { } \with { }
>>
>>
2014-07-30 17:38 GMT+02:00 James Harkins :
> A... I had forgotten that \tempo can take a markup, and you can omit
> the "note value = bpm" part.
>
Oups, so did I...
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/
Knute Snortum writes:
> Thanks David. That was the document I was working with but I missed
> setting the dynamicAbsoluteVolumeFunction and I didn't know how to compare
> the dynamic passed in to the markup.
>
> Slightly OT: I obviously don't know Scheme or Guile. I am a programmer,
> though.
Thanks David. That was the document I was working with but I missed
setting the dynamicAbsoluteVolumeFunction and I didn't know how to compare
the dynamic passed in to the markup.
Slightly OT: I obviously don't know Scheme or Guile. I am a programmer,
though. What would be the best way for me t
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 8:09:21 AM EDT, Thomas Morley wrote:
This looks more like a MetronomeMark
\mark \markup { \fontsize #-2 { \note #"4." #1 "=" \note #"2" #1 } }
It should be possible to stack MetronomeMark and RehearsalMark
in some manner.
A... I had forgotten that \tempo can
Dear List,
I'm trying to write customized chord symbols, for better visibility when
chord charts are displayed on smartphones. In this example I am trying
to place an "m" above a white triangle after the chord name.
I see that baseline-skip is affecting the size of the white triangle,
which doesn'
I'm typesetting some madrigals from book 2 of the Musica Transalpina. Part
of one of them has the passage attached. This looks like a brief 3/2
passage that reverts to 4/4 (or their perfect/imperfect mensural
equivalents).
I'd like to use a font for the signature that has this characteristic
Knute Snortum writes:
> I am getting my old friend the "ambiguous (de)crescendo" error. I can see
> why this would happen in the snippet below. I have defined a dynamic of
> "più f" and LilyPond doesn't know how to crescendo from a "f" to it.
>
> My usual way of dealing with this is to assign a
I am getting my old friend the "ambiguous (de)crescendo" error. I can see
why this would happen in the snippet below. I have defined a dynamic of
"più f" and LilyPond doesn't know how to crescendo from a "f" to it.
My usual way of dealing with this is to assign a MIDI volume to my new
dynamic.
2014-07-30 14:39 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> may I ask you to have a look?
>>
>> There's an optional argument failing with a single use-case and I've
>> no clue why.
>> Did I something wrong?
>>
>> (You may want to skip most of the mail and go to the REMA
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi David,
>
> may I ask you to have a look?
>
> There's an optional argument failing with a single use-case and I've
> no clue why.
> Did I something wrong?
>
> (You may want to skip most of the mail and go to the REMARK)
Optional argument declaration syntax conflicts wit
Schneidy writes:
> Up.
> Anyone ?
Use a larger baseline-skip. Score markups are not spaced like scores,
partly because scores have springs and other stuff that cannot be part
of a markup.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-use
Hi David,
may I ask you to have a look?
There's an optional argument failing with a single use-case and I've
no clue why.
Did I something wrong?
(You may want to skip most of the mail and go to the REMARK)
Thanks,
Harm
2014-07-30 9:09 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider
:
> Hi James,
>
> 2014-0
Up.
Anyone ?
-
~Pierre
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Fwd-Score-as-markup-squeezes-tp164455p165108.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gn
Hi James,
2014-07-30 1:49 GMT+02:00 James Harkins :
> In some places, I have a \markup-style mark over the same barline, and at
> the same barline, I also want a rehearsal mark (produced by \mark
> \default). Unfortunately it seems only one \mark is allowed at any given
> moment.
>
> This is a ty
Am 30.07.2014 um 01:49 schrieb James Harkins:
In some places, I have a \markup-style mark over the same barline, and
at the same barline, I also want a rehearsal mark (produced by \mark
\default). Unfortunately it seems only one \mark is allowed at any given
moment.
This is a type of markup-styl
25 matches
Mail list logo
