you can't suppress subsetting for the Emmentaler fonts. Can you send
a bug report to the gs people?
After a first look at the gs code I filed a bugreport:
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695728
And I think the comments to that are quite interesting. AFAICT (which isn't
very
I suggest you (because you know about that best) write a report to bug-lilypond.
I think this should be opened on our issue tracker,regardless labeling it bug
or enhancement.
Best
Urs
Am 15. Dezember 2014 10:18:21 MEZ, schrieb Knut Petersen
knut_peter...@t-online.de:
you can't suppress
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:18:21 +0100
Knut Petersen knut_peter...@t-online.de wrote:
Shall we open a lilypond bug report? I don't know - the generated ps code
is valid and works, so there is no real bug. I think it would be a
feature request.
It's a bit of both. PostScript is much more optimized
Am 15. Dezember 2014 11:05:59 MEZ, schrieb Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:18:21 +0100
Knut Petersen knut_peter...@t-online.de wrote:
Shall we open a lilypond bug report? I don't know - the generated ps
code
is valid and works, so there is no real bug. I think it
The solution I posted below works fine in the later 2.19 releases.
In 2.18 it is necessary to add a \layout block to the two scores.
Trevor
Joerg Peter wrote Sunday, December 14, 2014 7:09 PM
Is it possible to engrave the second StaffGroup to the right of the
first one without a line break
1) Is it clear that nobody would need Postscript output itself,
e.g. to produce something different than PDF?
PDF can be converted back to PS easily.
2) Is that a feasible goal?
Well, it would be a good solution. However, we need a PDF creation
library, I guess...
Werner
Am 15.12.2014 12:31, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
1) Is it clear that nobody would need Postscript output itself,
e.g. to produce something different than PDF?
PDF can be converted back to PS easily.
2) Is that a feasible goal?
Well, it would be a good solution. However, we need a PDF
On 15.12.2014 11:05, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:18:21 +0100
Knut Petersen knut_peter...@t-online.de wrote:
Shall we open a lilypond bug report? I don't know - the generated ps code
is valid and works, so there is no real bug. I think it would be a
feature request.
It's a bit
Am 2014-12-15 um 17:35 schrieb Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org:
Am 15.12.2014 12:31, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
1) Is it clear that nobody would need Postscript output itself,
e.g. to produce something different than PDF?
PDF can be converted back to PS easily.
2) Is that a feasible
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:33:57 +0600
Henning Hraban Ramm lilypon...@fiee.net wrote:
PS is much easier to write than PDF, since PS can be pure text, while PDF
is always binary, even in „text“ form.
Technically, this is true. Experience has taught me that generating
PostScript via text fragments
Find below is the corrected version of the modified snippet.
\version 2.18.2
%{ P Gentry 15 December 2014 08:23
;; Modified version of the LilyPond snippet enharmonic.ly (probably better as
enharmonic.ily)
;; This script will enharmonically spell a music object
;; Semi-tone intervals are dealt
Hi!
I'm writing lilypond score for six brass instruments from old
handwritten sheets.
The tune I'm working with has the form:
{Intro 4 bars} {A repeat twice 32 bars} {B repeat twice 16 bars} {A 32
bars} {Trio repeat twice 32 bars }
Alas, Tenor I breaks the form thus:
{Intro 4 bars} {A 64
On 12/15/2014 03:07 PM, Dan van Ginhoven wrote:
I'm writing lilypond score for six brass instruments from old
handwritten sheets.
The tune I'm working with has the form:
{Intro 4 bars} {A repeat twice 32 bars} {B repeat twice 16 bars} {A 32
bars} {Trio repeat twice 32 bars }
Alas,
Dan == Dan van Ginhoven danfa...@hotmail.com writes:
Dan Hi! I'm writing lilypond score for six brass instruments from
Dan old handwritten sheets. The tune I'm working with has the form:
Dan {Intro 4 bars} {A repeat twice 32 bars} {B repeat twice 16 bars}
Dan {A 32 bars} {Trio repeat twice 32
Hello,
Ich wrote a scheme function for getting a shortcut for the \relative command.
rel = #(define-music function
(parser location p notes)
It's define-music-function, not define-music function
HTH
Urs
Am 15.12.2014 23:56, schrieb Hans Sommer:
Hello,
Ich wrote a scheme function for getting a shortcut for the \relative command.
rel = #(define-music function
(parser location p notes)
Urs Liska ul at openlilylib.org writes:
It's define-music-function,
not define-music function
HTH
Urs
Am 15.12.2014 23:56, schrieb Hans
Sommer:
Hello,
Ich wrote a scheme function for getting a shortcut for the \relative command.
Am 16.12.2014 00:22, schrieb Hans Sommer:
Urs Liska ul at openlilylib.org writes:
It's define-music-function,
not define-music function
HTH
Urs
Am 15.12.2014 23:56, schrieb Hans
Sommer:
Hello,
Ich wrote a scheme function for getting
Hi,
Unstable release 2.19.15 has been around for a few months now. Is it
good news or bad news that we haven't seen a 2.19.16 release since then?
Just interested what's happening behind the developers screens.
--
MT
___
lilypond-user mailing
I assume the problem lies somewhere else in your infrastructure.
HTH
Urs
I used an 2.16.2 as it is in the repository of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
That was the problem.
I have downloaded 2.18.2 and have installed it manually. Now it works. Even
when I put \version 2.16.
Thank you Urs
20 matches
Mail list logo
