Re: EB Garamond font-series

This is correct. LibreOffice does fake italic, bold, and bold-italic if that variant doesn't exist. LilyPond, however, makes no attempt at this and just reverts to the closest one that is installed, which is usually the "regular" variant. - Abraham Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 8, 2015, at 9:

Re: EB Garamond font-series

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Thomas Spuhler wrote: > Are you sure: > see attachment from libreoffice writer, normal and bold > When there is no bold face present, a word processor might `fake' one by modifying the regular (roman) face. I don't know if that is what happened in your attachment,

Re: EB Garamond font-series

On Sunday, February 08, 2015 09:16:40 PM tisimst wrote: > No need to test that. There isn't a bold variant (yet), though it seems > like the author hopes to get that far. Hope that doesn't make you too > sad :) > > -Abraham > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Thomas Spuhler [via Lilypond] > > wrot

Re: openlilylib and Makefiles

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Craig Dabelstein wrote: > Does anyone have experience with using both openlilylib and Makefiles? I'm > using Urs' scholarLy, and have updated to the latest code as of yesterday, > and through Frescobaldi it all engraves fine. However, when I try to run my > Makefil

Re: EB Garamond font-series

No need to test that. There isn't a bold variant (yet), though it seems like the author hopes to get that far. Hope that doesn't make you too sad :) -Abraham On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Thomas Spuhler [via Lilypond] wrote: > On Monday, February 09, 2015 02:13:53 AM Simon Albrecht wrote: >

Re: EB Garamond font-series

On Monday, February 09, 2015 02:13:53 AM Simon Albrecht wrote: > Hello list, > > I just re-installed the incredibly beautiful EB Garamond font from > > , > but apparently Lily can’t fi

openlilylib and Makefiles

Hi List, Does anyone have experience with using both openlilylib and Makefiles? I'm using Urs' scholarLy, and have updated to the latest code as of yesterday, and through Frescobaldi it all engraves fine. However, when I try to run my Makefile on the same piece it gives me "cannot find file: `open

EB Garamond font-series

Hello list, I just re-installed the incredibly beautiful EB Garamond font from , but apparently Lily can’t find the bold font series. Can anyone tell me where to search for a solu

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

Am 08.02.2015 21:32, schrieb Kevin Barry: On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl > wrote: But I don't want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That's why each voice has i

Re: [OT] Vaughan is now composing…

Love this! Attach it to Frescobaldi's auto-compile so that it tweets and/or posts to my facebook wall every time. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OT-Vaughan-is-now-composing-tp171629p171630.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

[OT] Vaughan is now composing…

http://xkcd.com/1482/ …it would be quite easy to implement in Frescobaldi or Lilypond! Vaughan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Fwd: RE: How to remove gap in UpPrall spanner?

Am 08.02.2015 um 22:05 schrieb Ed Gordijn: > This is even better then perfection. Hi, I tried almost the same: \version "2.18.2" \relative c'' { \override TrillSpanner.bound-details.left.text = \markup\concat{ \raise #1.0 \smaller \musicglyph #"scripts.upprall" \hspace #-0.5

Re: new font? (was "Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid")

Am 8. Februar 2015 21:56:28 MEZ, schrieb tisimst : >Conor, et. al., > >Looking closely at the score, I don't believe the staff lines are >pre-fixed at all, since I can see variable spacing. I can't say for >anything beyond the one page in the pdf, of course. My experience tells >me that LilyPond

Fwd: RE: How to remove gap in UpPrall spanner?

Sorry, Didn't reply to the list. This is even better then perfection. \version "2.17.9" beginPrallSpan = \tweak bound-details.left.text \markup { \fontsize #-5 { \musicglyph #"accidentals.leftparen" } } \tweak bound-details.left.stencil-offset #'(0.02 . -0.65) \tweak bound-details.left.pa

Re: new font? (was "Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid")

Conor, et. al., Looking closely at the score, I don't believe the staff lines are pre-fixed at all, since I can see variable spacing. I can't say for anything beyond the one page in the pdf, of course. My experience tells me that LilyPond can manage just about anything I throw at it :) As for

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl wrote: > But I don’t want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I > want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That’s why > each voice has issued the \oneVoice command before asserting the r2. And > why is it only r

new font? (was "Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid")

It looks like an extremely neat handwritten score, but probably written on staves that were already set, space-wise. I wonder if it could be modified for the purposes of Lilypond, while retaining its distinct features. ~Conor > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Kieren MacMillan >

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

Hi Kieren, the output has indeed only one dot. But at least here it puts the dot in the upper staff space (where the e'' is) and not next to the rest. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list

Re: Hungarian Gregorian

Dear Pierre, Thank you for correcting something in connection with the dots, But we have still a problem with it. The program puts one dot in a right place and plus one above... I attached. Thank you! Sister Judit > > \version "2.19.15" \include "modernGregorian.ily" %\pointAndClickOff \langua

Tablature - Hide Tied Notes

I just recently upgraded to Fedora 21 which upgraded my Lilypond to 2.18.2. In previous versions the tied notes were hidden, but now they remain visible. I had been using the following snippet to hide them, but it doesn't seem to work anymore: #(define (tie::tab-clear-tied-fret-numbers grob)

Re: new font? (was "Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid")

Am 08.02.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: Hi Urs, I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly) implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the ideas propose

new font? (was "Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid")

Hi Urs, >> I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly) >> implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog >> post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the >> ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post >>

Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid

Hi Urs, > Can anyone tell me (or Matteo) if there have been any significant changes in > lyrics handling that may cause this? For it to behave as expected, you now need \new Voice (where you didn’t before) — maybe that’s messing things up? Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMi

Re: Octave check for c

On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 08:28:00AM +0100, Noeck wrote: > Hi Teoh, > > I can see no problem: > > \version "2.18.2" > > { g=4 } > \relative c'' { g='4 g,=4 g=4 } > > Can you send a minimal example showing your problem? [...] Sorry for the false alarm, folks, I can't reproduce the problem now eit

Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid

Hi Matteo, as I've already expressed privately I think this is a great project - thank you for following up on my ideas. If I get the README right this will in fact overcome several limitations of my so-far manual approach. I hope we'll be able to make that generally available in the most str

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

Hi Cynthia, > I guess the only way out is to rewrite the two voices so that one of them > issues hidden rests in the score, but the rests in the parts, via tags. Not at all… I can think of about a half-dozen other ways to make that happen in Lilypond. This would be my preference, since it woul

Re: [openLilyLib] Fundamental reorganization started

Am 08.02.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Urs Liska: We had already made some promising experiments, but only using the header-style documentation and usage examples mentioned above. See http://openlilylib.org/oll-test/index.html to get a first idea. ___ lilyp

[openLilyLib] Fundamental reorganization started

Hello everybody, triggered by some comments on my last post http://lilypondblog.org/2015/01/introducing-scholarly/ I decided to pick up a few loose ends that have been lying around for some time now, so I finally started restructuring openLilyLib, aiming at a quite fundamental change. So th

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

> On Feb 7, 2015, at 9:07 PM, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: > > Hi Cynthia, > >> In fact the output generated is just nonsensical. Two stacked augmentation >> dots? That just doesn’t seem right. > > No, it’s perfectly sensible, if you want (need) to make it visually explicit > that there are

Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs

Am 08.02.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Philippe Massart: The annotate.ly file in openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/examples/ OK. This is the "old" one, a new one is in openlilylib/ly/scholarly/usage-examples/annotate.ly This is not really complete or well-enough tested, but I've now committed that

Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs

The annotate.ly file in openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/examples/ Philippe > Le 8 févr. 2015 à 11:16, Urs Liska a écrit : > > > Am 08.02.2015 um 11:08 schrieb flup2: >> The few tests I made are working fine now; the only "not working thing" is >> the example file that still uses the former

Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs

Am 08.02.2015 um 11:08 schrieb flup2: The few tests I made are working fine now; the only "not working thing" is the example file that still uses the former loading and options syntax. which example file? I don't see any in my working directory. Urs Philippe -- View this message in cont

Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs

The few tests I made are working fine now; the only "not working thing" is the example file that still uses the former loading and options syntax. Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Annotate-and-Lilyglyphs-tp171471p171599.html Sent from the User mai

Re: Adding lyrics to basic drum beat

On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 13:20 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2015-02-07 11:45 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley : > > 2015-02-07 9:30 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : > >> Thomas Morley writes: > >> > >>> returns: > >>> warning: cannot find Voice `DV' > >>> > >>> \new Lyrics > >>> \lyricsto "DV"

Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs

Am 08.02.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Hi Urs, [1] I have moved to Git. That's a good thing. You'll see in a minute. [2] The new method of using ScholarLy is all working (when I engrave through Frescobaldi), but it does give me these warnings first: openLilyLib: library infras

Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs

Hi Urs, [1] I have moved to Git. [2] The new method of using ScholarLy is all working (when I engrave through Frescobaldi), but it does give me these warnings first: openLilyLib: library infrastructure successfully loaded. Interpreting music...[8][16][24] warning: openLilyLib: "context" prop