Hi,
I'd like to output like the attachment purpose.png.
But the following simple code
\parenthesize ces''4
puts the flat symbol out of the parens (with Lilypond 2.18.2).
I think that overriding the stencil of the left paren will make it so,
but I couldn't find the name of the stencil.
Or,
the second didn't work correctly so i changed it
\version "2.18.2"
Fraction = #(cons 6 8)
Arrastres =
#(define-music-function (parser location len main grace) (number? ly:music?
ly:music?)
(_i "Create @var{grace} note(s) after a @var{main} music _expression_.")
(let ((main-length (ly:music-le
I used the first snippet posted by Simon for an Arrastres function. Then I
noticed Davids post for afterGrace so I tried my hand at that.
Both work but I have a few questions.
In the first posted by simon I did it my typical way. And it works like all
my other functions. Typically I use modified
Hi,
>
> El 30/05/15 a las 13:31, Thomas Morley escibió:
>
>>
>> I'd deprecate the old one!
>>
>
Well, this one doesn't have quite the same amount of testing so you'd best
keep it around!
Attached you'll find a more streamlined version. Note that it's now an
override of PaperColumn, not NoteColum
Peter Crighton writes:
> 2015-05-30 21:50 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>
>>
>> Number three:
>>
>> divisiaIII = ^\markup { "div. a 3" }
>>
>> \score {
>> { a1_\divisiaIII }
>> }
>>
>
>
> That would still affect both editions, it wouldn’t be tweakable by the
> edition-engraver.
>
>
> In this score
Am 30.05.2015 um 18:10 schrieb Richard Shann:
Attached is a bit of LilyPond which has a slur over a line break. At the
same moment the clef is changing in the lower staff. The result is a
horribly broken slur start in the top staff.
I blindly applied the dragging-the-shape on this curve which gen
2015-05-30 21:50 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>
> Number three:
>
> divisiaIII = ^\markup { "div. a 3" }
>
> \score {
> { a1_\divisiaIII }
> }
>
That would still affect both editions, it wouldn’t be tweakable by the
edition-engraver.
In this score
divisiaIII = ^\markup { "div. a 3" }
\score {
2015-05-30 21:25 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2015-05-30 20:28 GMT+02:00 Peter Crighton :
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a variable divisiaIII = ^\markup { "div. a 3" } that should by
> > default appear above the staff (hence the ^). Now I need it to appear
> below
> > the staff in an instrument par
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2015-05-30 20:28 GMT+02:00 Peter Crighton :
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a variable divisiaIII = ^\markup { "div. a 3" } that should by
>> default appear above the staff (hence the ^). Now I need it to appear below
>> the staff in an instrument part edition, while it should
2015-05-30 20:28 GMT+02:00 Peter Crighton :
> Hello all,
>
> I have a variable divisiaIII = ^\markup { "div. a 3" } that should by
> default appear above the staff (hence the ^). Now I need it to appear below
> the staff in an instrument part edition, while it should still appear above
> the staff
Thank you both for your answers, I'll see to update to David's solution.
Regards. Víctor.
El 30/05/15 a las 13:31, Thomas Morley escibió:
2015-05-30 19:17 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik :
Hi Victor,
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Víctor wrote:
I've been using "center note column" function writt
2015-05-30 19:17 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik :
> Hi Victor,
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Víctor wrote:
>>
>> I've been using "center note column" function written by Thomas Morley,
>> for some time now, and today I've spotted a bug. Notice the position of the
>> dots in the last measure.
>>
>
Hello all,
I have a variable divisiaIII = ^\markup { "div. a 3" } that should by
default appear above the staff (hence the ^). Now I need it to appear below
the staff in an instrument part edition, while it should still appear above
the staff in the full score. Both editions are made from the same
On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 09:46 -0700, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Tried putting the "\clef treble" before the a8.
yes, it is fairly sensitive to minor changes...
I think I have found the answer to my other question - the manual says
that \shape can take a list of two sets of displacem
Hi,
Am 30.05.2015 um 12:38 schrieb Peter Gentry:
>
>>
>> FWIW
>>
>> I have attached a slightly simplified and better version of
>> instrument_ranges.ly
>>
>
>>
Have you seen http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=773?
David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
li
Hi Victor,
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Víctor wrote:
> I've been using "center note column" function written by Thomas Morley,
> for some time now, and today I've spotted a bug. Notice the position of the
> dots in the last measure.
>
> I hope this can be fixed.
> Regards. Víctor.
>
>
I don
On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 12:26 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> > Is this a known bug?
>
> I don’t know for sure… but in my current score, end-of-system clefs are
> causing a lot of problems
right - in fact I guess you could say there are two bad things that the
end of system clef
Richard,
Tried putting the "\clef treble" before the a8. Looks good to me, yet I do not
know what other constraints you have.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Richa
Hi Richard,
> Is this a known bug?
I don’t know for sure… but in my current score, end-of-system clefs are causing
a lot of problems (e.g., collisions with BreathingSign, spacing oddities), so
Lily isn’t quite Doing The Right Thing™ in there.
Perhaps after my current pressures are off, I will
Attached is a bit of LilyPond which has a slur over a line break. At the
same moment the clef is changing in the lower staff. The result is a
horribly broken slur start in the top staff.
I blindly applied the dragging-the-shape on this curve which generated
the commented out offsets. This results i
I am on fedora 22 and the current stable version of lilypond (2.18.2) is
working fine on my scores. I don't normally use unstable versions; should I
be concerned?
Kevin
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> On Fedora 21 and the recently released Fedora 22,
Am 30.05.2015 um 12:38 schrieb Peter Gentry:
FWIW
I have attached a slightly simplified and better version of instrument_ranges.ly
I haven't tested your code, but I like the idea of defining
instrument-specific tonal ranges quite a lot!
Some ideas/proposals:
1)
Can you store the tone rang
Greetings all,
On Fedora 21 and the recently released Fedora 22, lilypond 2.19.21 crashes
on my complex score with the following verbose output:
Drawing systems...lilypond:
/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/linux-64/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable/flower/include/interval.hh:2
FWIW
I have attached a slightly simplified and better version of instrument_ranges.ly
regards
Peter Gentry
\version "2.19.15"
% -
% include function file instrument_ranges.ly
% usuage include --> \i
Am 29.05.2015 um 10:29 schrieb Urs Liska:
> This is correct. From my own experience and comments by others most
> (major) publishers require you to submit one of the following:;
> - Finale files
> - Sibelius files
> - SCORE files
> - PDF
>
>> How can this be?
>
> Good question.
> Has to b
25 matches
Mail list logo
