I am a newbie as well.
It compiles without error message.
May be you meant
r1*4
instead of
R1*4
?
Am 01.09.2015 22:59, schrieb Martin Lejeune:
Hi Everybody,
here's a newbie question.
I tried to configure "merging automatically" of rests in polyphonic
staffs (piano) with a snipped, which I
I do not understand R1*4?
May be you wanted something like that, does not make sense for me and
may be there are better versions possible, anyway ...
%~~~
\version "2.18.2"
\header {
title = "merging rests"
}
global = { \time 4/4 }
Key =
I'm not sure you're getting this right. Singers sing words to the notes they
have. When there are notes with no words, what is the singer supposed to do?
i.e. when you have given the singer a skip, what do they sing?
I'm supposing that you are not properly separating the notes for the
Robert Schmaus writes:
>>
>> I do not understand R1*4?
>
> R is a full bar rest of the specified duration. Thus, R1 is a full bar
> rest that only makes sense in a 4/4 context. Duration-wise it spans
> the same time as r1, but is placed in the middle of the bar instead on
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4236
This also produces the unwanted "warning: omitting tuplet bracket with
neither left nor right bound":
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c''{
\tupletSpan 4
\tuplet 3/2 { c8 c c c c c c2.:8 }
}
Workaround:
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c''{
>
> I do not understand R1*4?
R is a full bar rest of the specified duration. Thus, R1 is a full bar rest
that only makes sense in a 4/4 context. Duration-wise it spans the same time as
r1, but is placed in the middle of the bar instead on the starting beat (or
moment). Likewise R2 is a full
On 9/2/2015 7:46 AM, Marcos Press [via Lilypond] wrote:
> 2015-09-02 9:33 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes <[hidden email]
> >:
>
> I'm not sure you're getting this right. Singers sing words to the
> notes they have. When there are notes with no words, what is the
> singer supposed to do?
Hi Harm, hi Stephen,
Am 02.09.2015 um 00:16 schrieb Thomas Morley:
[...]
Hi Marc,
I wrote some test
[...]
I hope it helps a bit, although I've found no convincing general value.
png with your example is attached as well.
thanks a lot for your investigations! Now I have something to work with
Am 02.09.2015 um 18:59 schrieb tisimst:
1. Create two music expressions, one for the intro and one for the
vocal part, and insert them in serial fashion in the same Staff
context.
2. Put the Lyrics context in parallel with the staff, but assigned
specifically to the vocal part
Hi again,
Am 02.09.2015 um 00:16 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi Marc,
I wrote some test
m =
\relative c' {
c1~ 1~ 2 s2
\bar "||"
c1~ 1~ 1
\bar "||"
c2~ 2~ 2~ 2~ 2~ 2
\bar "||"
}
\transpose c c \m
\transpose c d \m
\transpose c e \m
\transpose c f \m
\transpose c g \m
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Am 02.09.2015 um 16:07 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>
>> Well, you can just jump in with the lyrics: the Lyrics context does not
>> need to start with \lyricsto (though synchronization is a bit queer if
>> it doesn't, but still easier than counting
Am 02.09.2015 um 16:07 schrieb David Kastrup:
Well, you can just jump in with the lyrics: the Lyrics context does not
need to start with \lyricsto (though synchronization is a bit queer if
it doesn't, but still easier than counting syllables).
Brilliant, David! It’s good to have you for such
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 21:04 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
>
> > I've been trying to use the music function \beamExceptions
>
> "scheme function"
Is that to say that this should be called a scheme function not a music
function? I found it
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 20:13 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> > And there is a comment somewhere about using | to separate
> something,
> > I guess bars with the same \time signature (or, indeed different
> > ones).
>
> No, it's always for exactly one time signature, but at the time it is
>
Am 02.09.2015 um 21:35 schrieb Richard Shann:
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 20:13 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
And there is a comment somewhere about using | to separate
something,
I guess bars with the same \time signature (or, indeed different
ones).
No, it's always for exactly one time signature,
Hi Robert,
Well I am cringing.
But does this come closer to what you are after?
\version "2.19.26"
{
\clef bass
\once \override Tie.staff-position = #-2
cis1~ cis!1~ cis!1
}
You don’t really want the tie to cross the accidental, do you?
Andrew
On 3/09/2015
Any better?
\version "2.19.26"
{
\clef bass
\override Tie.details = #'((note-head-gap . 0))
cis1~ cis!1~ cis!1
dis! ~ dis!
fis! ~ fis!
bes! ~ bes!
}
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Let's say I have something like:
{
\clef bass
cis1~ cis!1~ cis!1
}
I want all the accidentals to appear and I do not want the tie to be moved
really far away like it is now. I preferred a few versions ago when it
would go right through the accidental.
I realize this is arguably crude and will
Richard Shann writes:
> On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 21:04 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Richard Shann writes:
>>
>> > I've been trying to use the music function \beamExceptions
>>
>> "scheme function"
>
> Is that to say that this should be called a
David,
On 8/31/2015 5:55 AM, David Stephen Grant [via Lilypond] wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm using Abraham's Profondo font, but having some trouble with
> TupletBrackets.
>
> I would like to indicate the duration of some feathered beamed groups
> with a TupletBracket showing the total duration. The
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 22:06 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> if you want to use \beamExceptions, it seems like the only way to do this is
> %%
> \version "2.19.25"
>
> {
>\time 4/4
>\set Timing.beamExceptions = \beamExceptions { 8[] 8[ 8] 8[] 8[] 8[
> 8 8] }
>
Am 02.09.2015 um 21:35 schrieb Richard Shann:
I guess I would know the answer to this if I could find out
what the alist holds initially, but my feeble attempt to elicit this via
\void \displayScheme #beamExceptions
gave me
#>
You can display the list of beam exceptions currently in effect by
I tried both versions (2.19) and do not see any difference?
On 02.09.2015 10:18, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4236
This also produces the unwanted "warning: omitting tuplet bracket with
neither left nor right bound":
\version "2.18.2"
\relative
Hi Caio,
Welcome to the list.
I am not sure how long you may have been following things, but this topic came
up for me recently, and there is various discussion in the archives. In a
nutshell, the answer is not really. It’s possible of course, but can it be done
simply and easily, that’s the
Hi,
Is it possible to have text centralized above a TextSpan? I've already
saw in the documentation text added in the middle of hairpins and of
course there is a tuplet number or fraction in the middle of the tuplet
bracket. But it seems that in Text Span this is not so easy to do.
Thanks!
Sorry, the point was the warning message, not the view. I missed that.
On 02.09.2015 13:37, BB wrote:
I tried both versions (2.19) and do not see any difference?
On 02.09.2015 10:18, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4236
This also produces the
Hi Caio,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
there is various discussion in the archives.
Try this out:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-05/msg00405.html
Best,
David
___
Marcos Press writes:
> 2015-09-02 9:33 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
>
>> I'm not sure you're getting this right. Singers sing words to the notes
>> they have. When there are notes with no words, what is the singer supposed
>> to do? i.e. when you have given
28 matches
Mail list logo