Re: Settings for automatic beam slope

On Tue 08 Dec 2015 at 12:34:55 (+1100), Andrew Bernard wrote: [...] > On the same topic, I have come across references to beam-qaunting, with no > explanation of what it is. Is this something to do with beams having to touch > staff lines? What is it exactly? Is this what is causing the flat beams

Re: A problem with the svg backend

perfect - thanks! Richard On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 16:34 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 07.12.2015 16:15, Richard Shann wrote: > > If I use markup and include a \with-url that contains embedded quotes > > the svg generated is invalid. Here is a simple example. > > > > > > \version "2.19.25" > >

A problem with the svg backend

If I use markup and include a \with-url that contains embedded quotes the svg generated is invalid. Here is a simple example. \version "2.19.25" \score { << { c d -\markup { \with-url #'"\"some quotes\"" hello} e f } >> } this is a nonsensical example, the

Re: A problem with the svg backend

On 07.12.2015 16:15, Richard Shann wrote: If I use markup and include a \with-url that contains embedded quotes the svg generated is invalid. Here is a simple example. \version "2.19.25" \score { << { c d -\markup { \with-url #'"\"some quotes\"" hello} e f } >>

RE: Kneed beams and changes of staff

I reported this at http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Kneed-beam-and-subdivisions-td184473.html and I also offered a 30 EUR bounty to whomever fix this. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Kneed-beams-and-changes-of-staff-tp184339p184553.html Sent from the

Grace note kicks tuplet number away

Hi all, When cross staffing, I found that sometimes a grace note in the middle of the beam causes the tuplet number to move absurdly higher or lower: \version "2.19.32" \markup{"ugly"} \autochange { \tuplet 7/4 { c,32[ c, c, \grace{ c,8 } c,32 c, c''' c,] } } \markup{"pretty"} \autochange {

Re: Grace note kicks tuplet number away

Hello Gilberto, it seems the feature announced in (at about 2/3, search for ‘knee-to-beam’) has been implemented without providing for this situation. So we should create a follow-up for

Re: Grace note kicks tuplet number away

Hi Simon, Thanks for your quick reply. Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > it seems the feature announced in > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/changes/index; (at > about > 2/3, search for ‘knee-to-beam’) has been implemented without providing > for this situation. So we should create a

Re: Settings for automatic beam slope

Hello All, I have only recently begun setting some Early Baroque keyboard music (1592) and it is full to the brim of phrases which are ornaments, 8 sixteenths beamed together. This is very typical, and pervasive. Suddenly I am noticing that the majority of the beaming comes out flat. I have