> On Apr 29, 2016, at 6:56 PM, Jeff Olson wrote:
>
> And for the limited range of a guitar (3.5 octaves) I can \transpose c c'
> to minimize the number of octave marks in absolute mode (so range is e, to
> b'').
> Thus I never encounter long high runs of 32nds above c'''.
The latest dev version
On 30/04/16 17:28, Thomas Morley wrote:
because some (rare) chords will have multiples "adds"s.
Ah, yes; shows how I'd not thought through the problem. Now if music
and its notation had been designed by an IEEE committee in the late
twentieth century (instead of by multiple communities in mu
2016-04-30 14:59 GMT+02:00 Henry Law :
> The second is that might lilypond be extended to include ":add9" as one of
> the standard chord formulations that is recognised?
We changed additionalPitchPrefix from "add" to "" some time ago,
because some (rare) chords will have multiples "adds"s. See:
Hi Joram,
> What I like about relative:
> 2) most mistakes are easily spottet as all the rest of the voice is off
> by one octave. […] In absolute mode, only one note is in the wrong octave.
This is the ONLY thing I miss about relative mode… but it is (was) VERY helpful
for proof-reading.
Cheer
Am 30.04.2016 um 14:53 schrieb ming :
It works in version 2.18.2
Error in version 2.19.40
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
What doesn’t work? Your mail lacks context (In-Reply-To header, quote,
or code example)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
Am 30.04.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Henry Law:
On 30/04/16 13:49, Henry Law wrote:
\new ChordNames {
\set additionalPitchPrefix = "add"
\chordmode { c:5.9 c:m7.5- c:5+.9- }
}
Another wrinkle I've just found. If you want a minor chord with an
added ninth (say) you can't code, for in
On 30/04/2016 9:36 pm, Thomas Morley wrote:
g2:5.9 is not correct. See the putput from the following code listing
some (all?) possibilities to _input_ the correct chord.
tst = {
\chordmode {
\set additionalPitchPrefix = "add"
c:1.3.5.9
c:3.5.9
c:5.9 %% not correct !
c:9^7
On 30/04/16 13:49, Henry Law wrote:
\new ChordNames {
\set additionalPitchPrefix = "add"
\chordmode { c:5.9 c:m7.5- c:5+.9- }
}
Another wrinkle I've just found. If you want a minor chord with an
added ninth (say) you can't code, for instance, d:m.9 as it gives an
error. You ha
On 29/04/16 18:22, Henry Law wrote:
In a lead sheet I want to use the chord which I call an "added ninth".
Using the key of C as an example, I want the chord C-E-G-D: a plain
major triad with the ninth added on top.
I've documented my experiences in the relevant places in the thread
elsewhere:
It works in version 2.18.2
Error in version 2.19.40
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 30/04/16 06:24, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
When you enter a chord with chord
mode, it is immediately translated into a set of notes, and whatever code
you used to enter it is forgotten.
That's a really clear exposition of the subject. As a sometime systems
architect I like this kind o
On 29/04/16 18:59, Malte Meyn wrote:
The magic is called additionalPitchPrefix. It can be found f. e. at
section 2.7.2 of the Notation Reference. The following code prints “C9
C9 Cadd9 C9”.
%
\version "2.18.2"
\new ChordNames {
\set additionalPitchPrefix = "add"
}
I had
Regrettable, nested quoting is messed up :(
Anyway, maybe of some help though:
2016-04-30 8:56 GMT+02:00 Brett Duncan :
> On 30/04/2016 3:24 pm, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016, Brett Duncan wrote:
>
> I coded g2:5.9 in chordmode and got G9, which isn't the right
>
On 30/04/2016 6:30 pm, Malte Meyn wrote:
Am 30.04.2016 um 08:56 schrieb Brett Duncan:
Henry, have you had any success with the pop-chords.ly file? (If not, I
have some files I could send to you.)
You don�t need this or chord exceptions in general if you follow my
much simpler answer that no
I have added that subject to my spam filter.
Anyway have fun in blabbermouting ...
On 30.04.2016 10:17, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:00:14 +
David Linn wrote:
1) I am not David Kastrup, I am David Linn.
Hi David, good to hear from you!
5) Personal attacks against a list
Am 30.04.2016 um 05:43 schrieb David Wright:
But it's no surprise that composing directly into LP is only really
possible in absolute mode.
It’s not. I’ve always done it in \relative mode using octave checks, I
never had any problems.
___
lilypon
Am 30.04.2016 um 08:56 schrieb Brett Duncan:
Henry, have you had any success with the pop-chords.ly file? (If not, I
have some files I could send to you.)
You don’t need this or chord exceptions in general if you follow my much
simpler answer that no-one replied to
(http://lists.gnu.org/arc
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:00:14 +
David Linn wrote:
> 1) I am not David Kastrup, I am David Linn.
Hi David, good to hear from you!
> 5) Personal attacks against a list administrator (such as the ones
> launched against me for the work I done on this list and its cousins and
> their predecessor
Hi,
Kieren and his choice for absolute is already mentioned.
What I like about relative:
1) mostly for for vocal scores, very few '/, are needed
2) most mistakes are easily spottet as all the rest of the voice is off
by one octave. While some find this annoying, I think it helps a lot to
find mi
Hi David,
Am 30.04.2016 um 05:43 schrieb David Wright:
> it would be great
> if it could convert into a canonical style, where canonical could be
> defined in ways such as: every note with pitch&duration; duration (or
> even pitch) on only the first note of each line (omitted elsewhere);
Frescoba
20 matches
Mail list logo
