Re: invisible note for expressive marks

2016-05-28 Thread Wols Lists
On 28/05/16 19:03, Marc Hohl wrote: > Am 28.05.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: >> The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it >> exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid >> this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p > > That's

Re: repeat and dynamic

2016-05-28 Thread Abraham Lee
On Saturday, May 28, 2016, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > What's the difference using or not using the \\? I tried but I didn't > see any difference. > g. In this case, nothing noticeable, but it really is different because using \\ creates completely new voice. So,

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

2016-05-28 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 28.05.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p That's exactly what I used as an example in you other

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

2016-05-28 Thread Urs Liska
Am 28.05.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it > exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid > this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p Do you have a concrete example of what you want to

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

2016-05-28 Thread Abraham Lee
On Saturday, May 28, 2016, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it > exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid > this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p > Uh, spacer rests? s\p Or

invisible note for expressive marks

2016-05-28 Thread Gianmaria Lari
The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: repeat and dynamic

2016-05-28 Thread Gianmaria Lari
What's the difference using or not using the \\? I tried but I didn't see any difference. g. On 27 May 2016 at 22:52, Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote: > In the line of using a master to hold all dynamic information, I’d prefer: > > << > \repeat unfold 3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5