Centering Chord Diagrams

Hi, I'm leaning Lilypond and cannot find this one ... I got some chord diagrams at the beginning of my score and would like to center them. Can someone help me with this (I'm sure simple) problem. Here's my Score --- \version "2.18.2" \include "predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly"

intentionally blank cover page ?

Dear All, I have a simple little problem. I have two viola suites, each two pages long. I would like to print these two pieces double sided, but with an intentionally blank first page so there is only one page turn from the first to the second piece in the collection I use (crudely) \book {

Re: Arpeggio and spacing question.

Hi Hwaen, Possibly? \once \override Arpeggio.padding = #8 \arpeggio Not optimal, but it does work. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Arpeggio and spacing question.

Greetings All, The following code results in the second arpeggio sign running into the preceding D-flat in the left hand. As there is very little room to move the arpeggio to the right before running into the following accidentals (also in the left hand), is there another spacing solution to this

RE: unwanted staves

Klaus, Perfect! Thank you so much. Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Klaus Blum Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 3:50 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: RE: unwanted staves Hi Mark, in your second

RE: unwanted staves

Hi Mark, in your second code example, the contents of the "lower" staff is no more grouped into a single expression by << ... >>, so you should put it into a pair of braces: % -- \new Staff = "lower" { % !! \time 4/4 \key bes \major \clef bass

RE: unwanted staves

Klaus, Thank you. I checked mine again. Perhaps I attached the wrong one. Have resubmitted the code. Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Klaus Blum Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 3:21 PM To:

Re: unwanted staves

Hi Mark, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote > In the attached snippet I want the "upper" staff to have two explicit > voices, while the "lower" staff has only one. > > Yet something I did makes two extra staves pop up. I cannot reproduce your problem. In your code I see two staves, each of them having

Re: Hiding a staff with notes in it

Impressive! Is it possible to hide lyrics automatically when the staff is hidden? Thanks, Evan On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 3:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > "Evan O'Dorney" writes: > > > Works great! I assume that one must manually change the name of the upper >

unwanted staves

Hello, In the attached snippet I want the "upper" staff to have two explicit voices, while the "lower" staff has only one. Yet something I did makes two extra staves pop up. What is my error? Thank you for your kind attention. Mark \version "2.18.2" \header { } \new PianoStaff

RE: Delayed Turn

Simon, Thank you for the code. Mark -Original Message- From: Simon Albrecht [mailto:simon.albre...@mail.de] Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 12:46 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek ; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Delayed Turn On 20.08.2016 19:18, Mark Stephen

Re: Delayed Turn

On 20.08.2016 19:18, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: Hello: Using the example in manual 2.18, I coded a delayed turn – see attachment. I want the turn to be a little higher than the “bes.” Any instructions would be appreciated. This is once again a use case for the nice \after function I could

RE: Delayed Turn

Malte Meyn, Thank for your reply and the instruction. Does it perfectly! Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Malte Meyn Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 10:39 AM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re:

Re: Delayed Turn

Am 20.08.2016 um 19:18 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek: I want the turn to be a little higher than the "bes." Any instructions would be appreciated. Try s2*1/2-\tweak Y-offset 5 \turn Also, \dolce is unknown to LilyPond, it should be "dolce" ;) ___

Re: Adding augmentation dots

>> I would like to add a dot, but \override Dots.dot-count = #1 has no effect. > > You can also use (e.g.) > > c4.*2/3 > > This puts the dot on, but only uses up a quarter note worth of time. Nice trick, thanks! Erik ___ lilypond-user mailing

Delayed Turn

Hello: Using the example in manual 2.18, I coded a delayed turn - see attachment. I want the turn to be a little higher than the "bes." Any instructions would be appreciated. Thank you for your kind attention. Mark \version "2.18.2" \score { \new PianoStaff << \set

Re: Adding augmentation dots

Am 20.08.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Erik Ronström: but \override Dots.dot-count = #1 has no effect. This is because there is no Dots grob. If I understand correctly one could create such a grob using ly:engraver-make-grob. But this needs a reference to the engraver (Dots_engraver in this case)

Re: Adding augmentation dots

Hi Erik, > I would like to add a dot, but \override Dots.dot-count = #1 has no effect. You can also use (e.g.) c4.*2/3 This puts the dot on, but only uses up a quarter note worth of time. Hope this helps! Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website:

Adding augmentation dots

Hi, For a dotted note, it’s possible to override the number of dots actually drawn. But when there are no dots to begin with? I would like to add a dot, but \override Dots.dot-count = #1 has no effect. Erik ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Stem for French Lute Tablature (Dowland)?

Devin, you wrote Friday, August 19, 2016 2:04 PM >On 08/18/2016 04:21 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: > >> Unfortunately virtually nowhere, apart from the first tiny step - lettered >> fret indications. > > Trevor, would you mind sending the complete .ly file you used to create your > example? >

Re: Midi dynamics behaviour changed in latest git HEAD

Hi, On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 10:16 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote: > I've been using lilypond from git HEAD (mainly because lilypond in my > distro is too old, still stuck at 2.18, and I need features and fixes > in 2.19), and recently I noticed that midi dynamics in my piano > scores aren't being rendered

Re: NoteHeads vs duration

Hi Malte. Actually the markups there were just to put something, not real issues. Thanks anyway! Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-20 12:41 GMT+02:00 Malte Meyn : > > > Am 20.08.2016 um 12:25 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: > >> (case duration

Re: NoteHeads vs duration

Am 20.08.2016 um 12:25 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: (case duration ((0) (grob-interpret-markup grob (markup "0"))) ((1) (grob-interpret-markup grob (markup "1"))) ((2) (grob-interpret-markup grob (markup "2")))

Re: NoteHeads vs duration

Thank you very much David. 2016-08-20 12:20 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Pierre Perol-Schneider writes: > > > Typo, sorry : so, again, how can I get access to the note head when > > duration is shorter than a fourth note ? > > > > \version

Re: NoteHeads vs duration

Pierre Perol-Schneider writes: > Typo, sorry : so, again, how can I get access to the note head when > duration is shorter than a fourth note ? > > \version "2.19.46" > > \score { > \new Staff \relative c'' { c1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 } > \layout { >

Re: Hiding a staff with notes in it

"Evan O'Dorney" writes: > Works great! I assume that one must manually change the name of the upper > staff from "S" to "S1" enough measures in advance to show up correctly. Well, no. In that case one would use the remove-layer thingy. Admittedly it's sort of wasteful to

Re: NoteHeads vs duration

Typo, sorry : so, again, how can I get access to the note head when duration is shorter than a fourth note ? \version "2.19.46" \score { \new Staff \relative c'' { c1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 } \layout { \context { \Staff \omit Stem \omit Flag \override NoteHead.stencil

NoteHeads vs duration

Hi, Please consider the following: \version "2.19.46" \score { \new Staff \relative c'' { c1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 } \layout { \context { \Staff \omit Stem \omit Flag \override NoteHead.stencil = #(lambda (grob) (let ((duration