Hi,
If you want better control over tuplet brackets and their angles, here's
some useful code.
You can get the brackets horizontal with little effort using this.
[Not my code, but I am unable to recall who created this to acknowledge
them.]
[Do tell us your name, it would be good and proper.
No bugs, no problems with this score. Thought I'd just toss this out there to
show a neat example of some things Lilypond can do that no other notation
program (that I know of -- haven't used SCORE) can do.
\version "2.18.2"
\header {
tagline = "" % removed
}
indent=0
\layout {
%
Andrew --
Thanks for the suggestion about "minimal working examples."
I'm a little puzzled about how I can reduce the size of my Lilpond code. In
the example above, for instance, I need at least one full measure of those
broken tuplets because anything less doesn't get the numerator and
Using urs Liska's recommended page break method for ametric scores, got close
to a score of simultaneous Nancarrowesque notated accelerations +
decelerations with proper page breaks. Mysterious empty staves appear on the
pages, though. Not sure why. I can photoshop these out from the lilypond
Hello mclaren (do you have a name for us?)
There's a willing community here ready to help, but we expect MWE's -
minimal working examples. I think that's only fair and reasonable, and has a
long tradition on this list.
Please refer to this guideline:
http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
Do
Am 06.11.2016 um 02:28 schrieb mclaren:
> This simple example crashes Lilypond.
This is not a simple example.
If you think you've come across a bug please create a "tiny example"
(http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html), "an example from which nothing
can be removed" and report it to
This simple example crashes Lilypond. You wouldn't think putting
6 broken tuplets into a measure would make Lilypond stop working,
but it does. To get the error
Exited with return code-1073741819
uncomment the line
% \time 4918233/340340
and comment the lines immediately below
\once
On 05.11.2016 20:41, Thomas Morley wrote:
At the current point of time, only a
DrumStaff accepts a DrumVoice so this should cause very little change.
The only change to be feared is that
\drums \with ... { }
would apply the context mod to the DrumVoice, not the DrumStaff. This
will make it
On 05.11.2016 05:01, Paul Scott wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 07:21:05PM -0700, Christopher Heckman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 04.11.2016 09:11, Christopher Heckman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Simon Albrecht
Dear Hans,
I just mentioned it to document here that David was right: I experienced
(for the first time) that development versions can be unstable. So I
blundered into trap with warning signs around.
>> Now, I try to use it and experience what I've seen on this list:
>>
>> time: 2m45.593s
>
>
> On 5 Nov 2016, at 22:16, Noeck wrote:
>
>>> We had some real nasties in the 40s. Maybe you did not update then.
>> No I did not update recently, I used 2.19.36 for a long time and 2.19.43
>> only for a short test of new syntax.
>
> Now, I try to use it and experience
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2016-11-05 14:11 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>
>> Now here is another consideration: I wanted to use \drums here but it
>> created another DrumStaff.
>>
>> It turns out that the shortcuts
>>
>> \figures \chords \drums \lyrics
>>
2016-11-05 22:39 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
>
>
> Am 05.11.2016 um 22:38 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>> 2016-11-05 21:26 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
>>>
>>> Am 05.11.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Urs Liska:
\override Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-permission = ##f
Am 05.11.2016 um 22:38 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> 2016-11-05 21:26 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
>>
>> Am 05.11.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Urs Liska:
>>> \override Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-permission = ##f
>>>
>>> will prevent any automatic breaks.
>> Ah, sorry, and of
2016-11-05 21:26 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
>
>
> Am 05.11.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Urs Liska:
>> \override Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-permission = ##f
>>
>> will prevent any automatic breaks.
>
> Ah, sorry, and of course
>
> \override
>> We had some real nasties in the 40s. Maybe you did not update then.
> No I did not update recently, I used 2.19.36 for a long time and 2.19.43
> only for a short test of new syntax.
Now, I try to use it and experience what I've seen on this list:
time: 2m45.593s
Am 05.11.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Urs Liska:
> \override Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-permission = ##f
>
> will prevent any automatic breaks.
Ah, sorry, and of course
\override Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn.page-break-permission = ##f
and
\override
Am 05.11.2016 um 21:20 schrieb David Sumbler:
> It always seems to be a bit hit-and-miss for me when I try to arrange
> the pagination of instrumental parts. Reading the manual it isn't
> clear to me how I can force page turns to occur *only* at the points I
> choose.
\override
It always seems to be a bit hit-and-miss for me when I try to arrange
the pagination of instrumental parts. Reading the manual it isn't
clear to me how I can force page turns to occur *only* at the points I
choose.
Also, Lilypond doesn't like ending on an even-numbered page. How can I
force it
2016-11-05 14:11 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Now here is another consideration: I wanted to use \drums here but it
> created another DrumStaff.
>
> It turns out that the shortcuts
>
> \figures \chords \drums \lyrics
>
> all create a Bottom context _except_ for \drums. Should we
2016-11-05 16:05 GMT+01:00 Andrew Bernard :
> This is a question about cross staff stems and beaming. Referring to the
> attached example, can this be done by any means in lilypond? Am I missing
> something obvious?
>
>
>
> Is there perhaps any way to have beams from the
I realized my mistake as I woke up this morning... Sorry for the idiotic
question and thanks for the help!
M
> From: "H. S. Teoh" >
> Subject: Re: More trill questions
> Date: November 4, 2016 at 7:19:43 PM EDT
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2016-11-05 12:39 GMT+01:00 Malte Meyn :
>>
>>
>> Am 04.11.2016 um 23:15 schrieb Tobin Chodos:
>>>
>>> What's the best way to handle a percussion part that has a lot of
>>> pitched and un-pitched material?
>>
>>
>> You could
2016-11-05 13:46 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2016-11-05 12:39 GMT+01:00 Malte Meyn :
>>
>>
>> Am 04.11.2016 um 23:15 schrieb Tobin Chodos:
>>>
>>> What's the best way to handle a percussion part that has a lot of
>>> pitched and un-pitched material?
2016-11-05 12:39 GMT+01:00 Malte Meyn :
>
>
> Am 04.11.2016 um 23:15 schrieb Tobin Chodos:
>>
>> What's the best way to handle a percussion part that has a lot of
>> pitched and un-pitched material?
>
>
> You could have a “pitched” Staff accept not only “pitched” Voices but
> I don't find it difficult at all
If you say so, I agree. My choice is clear but I don't want to offend
anyone.
>> I never had problems with the latest version called 'unstable':
>> http://lilypond.org/development.html
>
> We had some real nasties in the 40s. Maybe you did not update then.
On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 12:35 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Noeck writes:
>
> > Welcome Peter,
> >
> >> 1. What application do you recommend - Frescobaldi or Denemo ?
> >> (at http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html)
> >
> > This is difficult, because there are of course
Am 04.11.2016 um 23:15 schrieb Tobin Chodos:
What's the best way to handle a percussion part that has a lot of
pitched and un-pitched material?
You could have a “pitched” Staff accept not only “pitched” Voices but
also DrumVoices:
\version "2.18.2"
\new Staff \with {
\accepts DrumVoice
Noeck writes:
> Welcome Peter,
>
>> 1. What application do you recommend - Frescobaldi or Denemo ?
>> (at http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html)
>
> This is difficult, because there are of course advocates for both, in
> particular the developers.
I don't find it
Am 04.11.2016 um 22:11 schrieb Peter Lavetti:
Processing `/Users/peterlavetti/Desktop/Untitled.ly'
Parsing...
/Users/peterlavetti/Desktop/Untitled.ly:1: warning: no \version statement
found, please add
\version "2.18.2"
for future compatibility
Success: compilation successfully completed
Hi Federico,
thanks for your reply. I also looked at Mutopia and I have to revise
things: My currently planned approach is now B and A would be an
alternative.
Am 05.11.2016 um 10:43 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> Il giorno sab 5 nov 2016 alle 0:55, Noeck ha
> scritto:
>> A)
2016-11-05 10:29 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2016-11-05 2:50 GMT+01:00 Andrew Bernard :
>> Can one add two tenutos, say, or two of any articulation on a note, one
>> above and one below? For example
>>
>>
>>
>> {
>>
>> c’’^-_-
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>
Il giorno sab 5 nov 2016 alle 0:55, Noeck ha
scritto:
A) *folders per compilation step and file type*
My currently planned approach would be to have a folder for each type,
like libraries, scores, pdfs, etc. and then some shell scripts to
produce the output of a particular
2016-11-05 2:50 GMT+01:00 Andrew Bernard :
> Can one add two tenutos, say, or two of any articulation on a note, one
> above and one below? For example
>
>
>
> {
>
> c’’^-_-
>
> }
>
>
>
> That can be done if there are two different articulations involved, but when
> they
Welcome Peter,
> 1. What application do you recommend - Frescobaldi or Denemo ?
> (at http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html)
This is difficult, because there are of course advocates for both, in
particular the developers.
My personal recommendation is Frescobaldi.
In combination with the
Hello Peter,
Welcome to lilypond. It's a great tool. With all software, there's a
learning curve. Don't be put off. The list members will generally help you
out - it's a very good community online.
Lilypond is essentially a command line application. There are various front
ends. Many
36 matches
Mail list logo