Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 174, Issue 51

2017-05-14 Thread Johan Vromans
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:48 -0500, David Wright wrote: > Well, let's make sure we're starting from the same source: > ... > The attached shows that the file claims to be encoding="UTF-8" > In emacs, the Copyright shows as \302\251 so I think you've > missed the preceding  (0xc2) character someh

Re: program error: mis-predicted force

2017-05-14 Thread Jacques Menu Muzhic
Hello Auke, Here is what I get with 2.19.55: Starting lilypond 2.19.55 [Untitled (2)]... Processing `/var/folders/jc/xrpy67_x6_vcjfzpzds_9_6mgn/T/frescobaldi-cgabe6rk/tmpsguji5sa/document.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music... Preprocessing graphical objects... Finding the ideal number of page

Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 174, Issue 51

2017-05-14 Thread Johan Vromans
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:45:22 +, Ian Ring wrote: > If your MusicXML contains a literal copyright character, it's invalid > XML. Find-and-replace that to © or change it into (c) and you'll be > good to go. Not quite. Provided the Copyright symbol is encoded in the same encoding as the XML docu

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

2017-05-14 Thread Johan Vromans
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:06:47 +0200, Urs Liska wrote: > But can that be? Shouldn't MusicXML allow arbitrary regular Unicode > characters? Yes, but the file should be encoded using a single encoding. In this case, some parts of the file are UTF-8 encoded while other parts are UTF-16. ___

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

2017-05-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" To: Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2017 3:06 PM Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again Am 14.05.2017 um 16:03 schrieb Phil Holmes: I've just confirmed Ian Ring's suggestion - removing the copyright symbol allows the conversion to continue, but re

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

2017-05-14 Thread Urs Liska
Am 14.05.2017 um 16:03 schrieb Phil Holmes: > I've just confirmed Ian Ring's suggestion - removing the copyright > symbol allows the conversion to continue, but results in text with > spurious null characters. But can that be? Shouldn't MusicXML allow arbitrary regular Unicode characters? Urs -

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

2017-05-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes" To: "Leszek Wronski" ; Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2017 2:31 PM Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again - Original Message - From: "Leszek Wronski" To: Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:54 PM Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 174, Issue 51

2017-05-14 Thread Ian Ring
If your MusicXML contains a literal copyright character, it's invalid XML. Find-and-replace that to © or change it into (c) and you'll be good to go. I've had to do that with XML output from MuseSore. Cheers ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

2017-05-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Leszek Wronski" To: Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:54 PM Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again Dear Phil, I read through the 2 pages of comments at the link you provided. Is the ultimate suggestion the one in your last comment, that is, "I believe th

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

2017-05-14 Thread Robert Blackstone
Hi David, Ref.: "What's the role of TeXShop? What process did it carry out? " TeXShop, by means of its LilyPond Engine, processed the file containing the code copied from Frescobaldi. I processed the file with two LilyPond versions, 2.18.2 and 2.19.58.1, and as far I could see the results were

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

2017-05-14 Thread David Wright
On Sun 14 May 2017 at 12:42:03 (+0200), Robert Blackstone wrote: > Hi Leszek, > > Out of curiosity I downloaded and processed the Kyrie.xml, from the link you > attached to your post of 12-05-17. > I was curious in particular because I mostly use the same procedure for > engraving with LilyPon

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

2017-05-14 Thread Robert Blackstone
Hi Leszek, Out of curiosity I downloaded and processed the Kyrie.xml, from the link you attached to your post of 12-05-17. I was curious in particular because I mostly use the same procedure for engraving with LilyPond as you do, starting with Finale, except that I'm on a Mac (OSX 10.9.5 also