Re: my barline "split arrows" function needs improvement

Hi Kieran, I think you need an event function, not a tweak, split-arrows = #(define-event-function () () #{ -\splitStaffBarLineMarkup #} ) I have not figured out how to incorporate \break in that. Others will know! Andrew ___ lilypond

Re: what did I wrong?

Indeed, totally stupid! I totally overlooked that line. Thanks! Am 03.06.2017 um 17:31 schrieb David Kastrup: > bb writes: > >> Thank you for answering. >> >> I confirm, that the Banjo TABs will show correctly, I used it quite >> often in the past in g tuning and different tunings as well. I. e.

Re: my barline "split arrows" function needs improvement

Hi again, D'oh again… My "fix" appears to work as a global override, but not as a one-off tweak (see attached modified snippet). I played around with \stopStaff & \startStaff, but couldn't find the magic incantation. Help re-requested. =) Thanks, Kieren. %%% SNIPPET BEGINS \version "2.19.6

Re: my barline "split arrows" function needs improvement

Hi all, D'oh… > I tried attaching the arrows to the StaffSymbol — that seems the most elegant > solution — but my attempt didn't work. User error. Works great. Sorry for the noise. Thanks, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info

my barline "split arrows" function needs improvement

Hello all, In the snippet included below, I show how I use angled arrows to indicate a staff will split into multiple staves after the system break. (Note: It doesn't actually happen here, since I wanted my WE to be reasonably M!) The problem is, the function attaches the arrows to the carline,

Re: pushing items "through" or "beyond" other contexts

Hi all, To clarify/expand: > That being said, I was (am still?) hoping for a more robust and extensible > solution: in the real-world situations I'm looking at, this method/mechanism > either won't work at all, or at the very least would seem to be a coding, > reusability, and maintenance nigh

Re: pushing items "through" or "beyond" other contexts

Hi Simon, > here you are with an elaboration: Thanks. It's good to know what the "solution" is, in this MWE context. It might even be feasible — albeit frustratingly verbose — in a simple situation (e.g., piano with centred dynamics). That being said, I was (am sti

Re: pushing items "through" or "beyond" other contexts

Hi Kieren, here you are with an elaboration: http://lilybin.com/f2e2fx/1> BTW, your snippet would have been more compilable without the typographical quotes (it seems your mail client inserts them - can you send as plain text?) Best, Simon Am 02-Jun-2017 21:53:59 +0200 schrieb kieren_mac

Re: pushing items "through" or "beyond" other contexts

Hi Mark, > What about > \context Staff = "upper" s2^\p You mean \version "2.19.60" upperStuff = { c''2 d''4( c'') } centredDynamics = { s2\f \context Staff = "upper" s2^\p } lowerStuff = { \clef bass c1 } \new PianoStaff << \new Staff = “upper” \upperStuff \new Dynamics = “dyn”

Re: what did I wrong?

bb writes: > Thank you for answering. > > I confirm, that the Banjo TABs will show correctly, I used it quite > often in the past in g tuning and different tunings as well. I. e. the > usual old time sawmill tuning > sawmill = \stringTuning < g' c g c' d' >. > > I need TABs for a Guitar tuned

Re: what did I wrong?

I wanted to show that a transposition does show the error as well. But wrote the opposite! Sorry for that! Am 03.06.2017 um 17:11 schrieb bb: > Thank you for answering. > > I confirm, that the Banjo TABs will show correctly, I used it quite > often in the past in g tuning and different tunings as

Re: what did I wrong?

Thank you for answering. I confirm, that the Banjo TABs will show correctly, I used it quite often in the past in g tuning and different tunings as well. I. e. the usual old time sawmill tuning sawmill = \stringTuning < g' c g c' d' >. I need TABs for a Guitar tuned in perfect fourth fourth

Re: pushing items "through" or "beyond" other contexts

At 15:53 on 02 Jun 2017, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >Hi, > >> Couldn't you do \new Dynamics { \alignAboveContext = "upper" >> s4/p }? > >No. =\ > >p.s. I’ve now included a compilable snippet, if anyone wants to try >stuff out. > >Thanks, >Kieren. > >%%% SNIPPET BEGINS >\version "2.19.61" > >upperS

Re: what did I wrong?

bb writes: > the b and c should be 2 and 3 on string 5. Instead they show 7 and 8, > even with predefined string 5. > > I kindly ask for help. > > Kind regards BB > > > \version "2.18.2" > > #(set-global-staff-size 27) %%% System > >fourth = \stringTuning < f, a, d g c' f'

Re:RE;re; beaming with cadenzaOn

Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 12:08:09 +0100 From: "Phil Holmes" To: "Sam Frybyte" , "lilypond user group" , Subject: Re: RE;re; beaming with cadenzaOn Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" - Original Message - From: "Sam Frybyte" To: "lilypond us

what did I wrong?

the b and c should be 2 and 3 on string 5. Instead they show 7 and 8, even with predefined string 5. I kindly ask for help. Kind regards BB \version "2.18.2" #(set-global-staff-size 27) %%% System fourth = \stringTuning < f, a, d g c' f' > Scale= { \relativ