Re: Understanding how \tag works in \relative pitched music

2017-08-06 Thread David Wright
On Sun 06 Aug 2017 at 22:51:57 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote: > David Wright writes: > > > (\fixed could have been implemented differently, ie without > > collapsing the meaning of c' through b' as its first argument. > > This might make it more useful for parts having

Re: Allow dynamic + span bar line collision

2017-08-06 Thread Jay Anderson
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Jay Anderson wrote: > I believe the default behavior in this case used to be for the dynamics to > collide with the bar line. These days it is creating a bit more space for > the dynamic. That's the right behavior in most cases, but not the

Allow dynamic + span bar line collision

2017-08-06 Thread Jay Anderson
I believe the default behavior in this case used to be for the dynamics to collide with the bar line. These days it is creating a bit more space for the dynamic. That's the right behavior in most cases, but not the one below. How do I allow the collision in this case and let the 'sempre' hang to

Re: making parts : specific number of measures per line?

2017-08-06 Thread Brian Barker
At 19:00 06/08/2017 -0400, Molly Preston wrote: Ok I've been messing with this and I realize that where I have s1*13 at m.86 it seems to print out 15 measures instead and doesn't generate an error. It prints out 12 measures on one line at m.98. I don't understand how it's counting? \version

Re: making parts : specific number of measures per line?

2017-08-06 Thread Molly Preston
Ok I've been messing with this and I realize that where I have s1*13 at m.86 it seems to print out 15 measures instead and doesn't generate an error. It prints out 12 measures on one line at m.98. I don't understand how it's counting? \version "2.18.2" layoutContent = { \repeat unfold 11 { s1 *6

Re: Understanding how \tag works in \relative pitched music

2017-08-06 Thread David Kastrup
David Wright writes: > (\fixed could have been implemented differently, ie without > collapsing the meaning of c' through b' as its first argument. > This might make it more useful for parts having a limited range > centered close to c.) How so? The reason we

Re: making parts : specific number of measures per line?

2017-08-06 Thread Thomas Morley
2017-08-06 18:27 GMT+02:00 Molly Preston : > I don't get any barcheck problems in the flute part. I see it now... I think > it's the multimeasure rests. > > Is there another way to do this so I don't have to alter all my multimeasure > rests? > > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at

Re: making parts : specific number of measures per line?

2017-08-06 Thread Molly Preston
I don't get any barcheck problems in the flute part. I see it now... I think it's the multimeasure rests. Is there another way to do this so I don't have to alter all my multimeasure rests? On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 12:18 PM, David Wright wrote: > On Sun 06 Aug 2017 at

Re: making parts : specific number of measures per line?

2017-08-06 Thread David Wright
On Sun 06 Aug 2017 at 11:36:50 (-0400), Molly Preston wrote: > Hi again everyone, > I am trying the following for making 6 measures per line in the flute part. > > layoutContent = { > > s1 *6 \break > } > > \score { > \new Staff << >\new Voice { > \fluteMusic > } > > \new Voice {

Re: Understanding how \tag works in \relative pitched music

2017-08-06 Thread David Wright
On Sat 05 Aug 2017 at 09:07:48 (-0400), Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi, > > > Huh, can't say I've heard of \fixed. > > It may have been a relatively [ha!] recent addition…? > See > AFAICT \fixed is not in 2.18.2 but is

making parts : specific number of measures per line?

2017-08-06 Thread Molly Preston
Hi again everyone, I am trying the following for making 6 measures per line in the flute part. layoutContent = { s1 *6 \break } \score { \new Staff << \new Voice { \fluteMusic } \new Voice { \repeat unfold 20 { \layoutContent } } >> } If i use the repeat unfold command I get

Re: Understanding how \tag works in \relative pitched music

2017-08-06 Thread David Kastrup
caag...@gmail.com writes: > Huh, can't say I've heard of \fixed. I always use \transpose c c'', > which seems to have the same effect. It looks stupid in the code, > though. The effect is not the same. \transpose c c'' \absolute ... is the same as \transpose c c'' ... while \fixed c''

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaves for drums?

2017-08-06 Thread Abraham Lee
Hi, Molly! On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > However I can't seem to get it to \RemoveEmptyStaves for the \DrumStaff. > This is what I tried. > > > > \layout { > > \context { > > \Staff > > \RemoveEmptyStaves > > \DrumStaff > >