Hello!
I am trying to have a bar take up way more horizontal space since I have a
lot of dynamic markings that bunch up since they are at small subdivisions
of the note and with great frequency for example I try
\version "2.14.1"
{
a32\p bes32\pp g32\mp d'32\<~ d'8
bes'8->-\markup{\bold
Hi Robert,
Instead of using \voiceTwo, you could add a new tag : \tag #'tag_orchestral {
\voiceTwo}
I think this method will give you the expected result.
HTH
Rémy
> Message du 15/10/17 16:21
> De : "Robert Kubosz"
> A : lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Copie à :
> Objet : Switch
Robert Kubosz writes:
> Thanks, David, I will definitely use tagGroup. I see some possible
> application for it in my work.
>
> It is revolutionary for me, that I can tag not only _music_, but also
> a music command. This idea never crossed my mind.
\voiceTwo _is_ music
Thanks, David, I will definitely use tagGroup. I see some possible
application for it in my work.
It is revolutionary for me, that I can tag not only _music_, but also
a music command. This idea never crossed my mind.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Robert Kubosz writes:
> Hi Rémy
>
> This is it. I owe you a good beer, man :-)
You might also want to take a look at the \tagGroup command when using
tags for more than one purpose.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user
Hi Rémy
This is it. I owe you a good beer, man :-)
Thanks!
Robert
On 10/15/2017 06:43 PM, Remy CLAVERIE wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
>
>
> Instead of using \voiceTwo, you could add a new tag : \tag
> #'tag_orchestral { \voiceTwo}
>
>
>
> I think this method will give you the expected result.
>
Hi everyone!
I have a project with many music pieces for brass orchestra. I wrote
a score template with tags, so I can easily extract parts from it.
I works almost perfectly, but a extracted voice is still engraved as
\voiceOne or \voiceTwo instead of default engraving like \oneVoice.
I really
James Harkins writes:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:32:29 +0800 David Kastrup wrote
>
>> > Never mind, I see my mistake now. I had extrapolated from \new Staff
>> > and \new Voice to \new Score. LilyPond accepts \new Score
>> > (!). Possible
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:32:29 +0800 David Kastrup wrote
> > Never mind, I see my mistake now. I had extrapolated from \new Staff
> > and \new Voice to \new Score. LilyPond accepts \new Score
> > (!). Possible improvement might be to reject that wrong syntax with an
> >
James Harkins writes:
>> 1. If I write it as specified in the manual, I get a syntax error.
>>
>> 2. If I write it as above, I get no syntax error, and no MIDI file.
>
> Never mind, I see my mistake now. I had extrapolated from \new Staff
> and \new Voice to \new Score.
Hi David,
thanks, that did it!
@Martin: I use arch linux and installed the development version of
lilypond (2.19.65) and its documentation.
--
Orm
Am Samstag, den 14. Oktober 2017 um 19:20:56 Uhr (-0500) schrieb David Wright:
> On Sat 14 Oct 2017 at 15:02:08 (+0200), Orm Finnendahl wrote:
>
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 17:39:18 +0800 James Harkins
wrote
> However, the LP version installed from Ubuntu 16.04 packages requires this:
>
> \layout { }
> \midi { }
> \score {
> …music…
> }
>
> \layout{} or \midi{} inside the \score
> 1. If I write it as specified in the manual, I get a syntax error.
>
> 2. If I write it as above, I get no syntax error, and no MIDI file.
Never mind, I see my mistake now. I had extrapolated from \new Staff and \new
Voice to \new Score. LilyPond accepts \new Score (!). Possible
I suppose this must have been reported at some point, but, LP 2.18.2 (stable):
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/creating-midi-files
```
To create a MIDI output file from a LilyPond file, insert a \midi block inside
a \score block;
\score {
…music…
\layout {
Hi Kieren,
I believe you're right!
Thanks a lot,
Best, Robert
> On 14 Oct 2017, at 21:39, Kieren MacMillan
> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> I believe you’re looking for
>
>\with { \omit TextScript }
>
> Hope that helps!
> Kieren.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo