Re: Tie/Accidental Collision

Hi Kieren and Stéfano, Thanks so much for both of your help; your ideas were both different (but much simpler) approaches than I was considering, and I was able to combine them into the best solution for my full example. Take care, Sam On 03/21/2018 04:15 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi

Re: Build error. MergeFonts: Can't find font: feta11.pfb

On 18.03.2018 12:17, Malte Meyn wrote: > Am 17.03.2018 um 20:01 schrieb Lucas Werkmeister: >> Can confirm, coredumpctl shows loads of t1asm core dumps (no idea why >> there’s no error message in the terminal), and downgrading to t1utils >> 1.39 fixed the problem (1.40 seems buggy as well). Thanks

Re: Tie/Accidental Collision

Hi Stéfano, > How about using TieColum.tie-configuration? Together with > Tie.details.height-limit you can avoid the collision. This is nice! But I would suggest not having the Stem whiteout affect the StaffSymbol… It's probably enough just to write \override Tie.layer = -2 and \once

Re: MIDI tick resolution

Gilberto: > Karl Hammar wrote > > The technical limitation of midi file format is that the tick is a > > 15bit quantity, i.e. the maximum value is 2^15-1 = 32767. ... > The only issue of going overboard with that value is that some DAWs might > then complain when opening these files (I never tried

Re: Tie/Accidental Collision

Hi Sam, How about using TieColum.tie-configuration? Together with Tie.details.height-limit you can avoid the collision. I don't know how to shorten the Ties, but I used Kieren's whiteout idea to make them finish them in the Stem. If someone knows how to actually shorten them I'd be happy to

Re: How to write a ly:pitch? as element of a pair?

Urs Liska writes: > Hi Malte, David, > > thank you for your suggestions. > > > Am 21.03.2018 um 15:43 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska writes: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> ... >>> >>> >>> So is there a convenient way to write a pitch within a Scheme

Re: How to write a ly:pitch? as element of a pair?

Hi Malte, David, thank you for your suggestions. Am 21.03.2018 um 15:43 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Hi all, ... So is there a convenient way to write a pitch within a Scheme expression? Like usual with quoting. transposition = #`( ,#{ d' #} . "D")

Re: How to write a ly:pitch? as element of a pair?

Urs Liska writes: > Hi all, > > I have a with block where I would like to let the user enter a pair as > a value, and one of the elements of the pair should be a pitch. > > Something like: > > \with { >   transposition = #'( d' . "D") > } > > But this doesn't work, just

Re: MIDI tick resolution

Hi Karl, thanks for your reply! Karl Hammar wrote > The technical limitation of midi file format is that the tick is a > 15bit quantity, i.e. the maximum value is 2^15-1 = 32767. > > [...] > > So you can't get 128*9*5*7 = 40320, but 64*9*5*7 = 20160 is possible, > and if you really need

Re: How to write a ly:pitch? as element of a pair?

Am 21.03.2018 um 15:28 schrieb Urs Liska: Hi all, I have a with block where I would like to let the user enter a pair as a value, and one of the elements of the pair should be a pitch. Something like: \with {   transposition = #'( d' . "D") } But this doesn't work, just like  

How to write a ly:pitch? as element of a pair?

Hi all, I have a with block where I would like to let the user enter a pair as a value, and one of the elements of the pair should be a pitch. Something like: \with {   transposition = #'( d' . "D") } But this doesn't work, just like   transposition = #'( #{ d' #} . "D") What I currently

Re: MIDI tick resolution

David: > Malte Meyn writes: > > > Am 19.03.2018 um 14:47 schrieb k...@aspodata.se: > >> You could try the attached rudimentary patch and recompile your > >> lilypond source, see if that solves your problem, and report back. > > Would it be possible to make a patch that

Re: Tie/Accidental Collision

Hi Sam, > In the attached MWE, I'm having difficulties correcting the collision between > the tie and the accidental. > The documentation has ample support for slur/accidental collisions, but I'm > having trouble fixing the collision with ties. > I'd appreciate any help you can offer! Don’t

Re: MIDI tick resolution

Gilberto: ... > Also keep in mind that tick resolution is given in pulses per quarter note > (PPQ), not seconds. This means that a slow piece will have a lower > resolution /in true time/, i.e. ticks per second. I don't think resolution /in true time/ matters, since each tick is "exact" in some

Re: Constant Hairpin on line break

Thanx a lot, This works marvelously well ! Wondering, if this should not be by default? Best K On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:16:13AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2018-03-21 3:28 GMT+01:00 Karim Haddad : > > Hi, > > > > Does somebody know how to avoid having the vertical

Re: Constant Hairpin on line break

2018-03-21 3:28 GMT+01:00 Karim Haddad : > Hi, > > Does somebody know how to avoid having the vertical hook on a line break and > just to have it on the end of a constant hairpin ? > Here is a minimal example code : > > \relative c'' { > \override Hairpin.stencil =