Satire is IP just the same as anything else.
Unless your comment was satirical!
Andrew
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 04:26, Aaron Hill wrote:
>
>
> P.S. I'm not sure how international intellectual property laws deal
> with satire.
>
>
___
lilypond-user
I have now packed the magnifyStaff with the individual organ=Piano
staffs; that worked. Thanks you to make me aware of the error with the
pianostaff.
organPart = <<
\new PianoStaff \with {
instrumentName = "Orgel"
} <<
\new Staff = "right" \with {
\magnifyStaff #4/7
} <<
On 2018-09-20 1:26 am, foxfanfare wrote:
Anyone motivated?
https://curatingsubjects.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/79b.gif
Seems someone got a little confused. That GIF mixes two songs by Stump.
"Faerie's Aire..." is only one page long. The second page is part of
"String Quartet No. 556(b)
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 05:06:48PM +0100, Peter Toye wrote:
>Guy,
>
>Thanks. I've found the thread. It seems fairly complicated, and as
>I only use MIDI for proof-reading (proof-hearing?) I’ll ignore the
>dynamics altogether! Life's too short.
My usual approach, as always, is to
Guy,
Thanks. I've found the thread. It seems fairly complicated, and as I only use
MIDI for proof-reading (proof-hearing?) I’ll ignore the dynamics altogether!
Life's too short.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Thursday, September 20,
foxfanfare wrote
> Scriabin.JPG
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t5604/Scriabin.JPG;
> Scriabin_-_Piano_Sonata_No.ly
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t5604/Scriabin_-_Piano_Sonata_No.ly;
>
Little mistake, could you please correct line 16 with:
\finger
\markup
Urs Liska-3 wrote
> I would say generally it should include one system because it should
> require as little compiling time as possible and that would most likely
> fit in the window without (much) scrolling. If it feels useful or
> necessary to show more then it's ok, too. The window will cope
Peter,
Do a search in the list archives. There was an extended discussion about
this very thing in the past month with multiple offered solutions.
Regards,
Guy
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 6:34 AM Peter Toye wrote:
> I want to have a Dynamics staff between the music staves on a PianoStaff,
> but
Am 20.09.18 um 13:49 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
In the following example I want to reduce the size of the organ part
using \magnifyStaff #4/7. But I do not succeed. Where do I have to place it?
\magnifyStaff should be placed in a \with block of the staff you want to
shrink. Currently it
In the following example I want to reduce the size of the organ part
using \magnifyStaff #4/7. But I do not succeed. Where do I have to place it?
BTW searching google with "lilypond magnifyStaff" is not successfull
since the first results do not have a magnifyStaff command in it.
Regards
I want to have a Dynamics staff between the music staves on a PianoStaff, but
this doesn't change the dynamics on the MIDI output. Is there any way of
getting the MIDI output to use the \Dynamics? In the example below they all
have the same (presumably default) dynamic (at least, when played
Am 20.09.2018 um 12:10 schrieb foxfanfare:
Urs Liska-3 wrote
Now all I need is a bunch of (self-contained) sample files without paper
blocks which I can then add to the ComboBox's list.
Looking forward to contributions.
Urs
Great! How long should the excerpt be? 1 line? 1 page? more?
I
Urs Liska-3 wrote
> Now all I need is a bunch of (self-contained) sample files without paper
> blocks which I can then add to the ComboBox's list.
> Looking forward to contributions.
>
> Urs
Great! How long should the excerpt be? 1 line? 1 page? more?
--
Sent from:
Am 20.09.2018 um 10:39 schrieb Urs Liska:
This is a very good idea.
I have now implemented the option to use custom files as can be seen
here:
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/pull/1075#issuecomment-423093733
(the screencast is probably too large for the list so I refer to that
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 11:28 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:24 PM Simon Albrecht
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 16.08.2018 23:37, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >> > Well, currently, it's coming out of the $300 new user credit that
> >> > Google offers
2018-09-20 10:37 GMT+02:00 foxfanfare :
> James Harkins-4 wrote
>> That's exactly it. Thanks!
>>
>> Would be useful as a snippet perhaps... this totally eluded me in the
>> manual. I tried to find info about bound-details but missed it somehow.
>>
>> hjh
>
> I agree, I learnt more about
Am 20.09.2018 um 10:26 schrieb foxfanfare:
Urs Liska-3 wrote
Now that there seems to be a certain common understanding of my initial
idea, may I repeat my request for someone to provide a suitable default
sample document?
Coming up with a score that provides representative details with as
James Harkins-4 wrote
> That's exactly it. Thanks!
>
> Would be useful as a snippet perhaps... this totally eluded me in the
> manual. I tried to find info about bound-details but missed it somehow.
>
> hjh
I agree, I learnt more about bound-details in this forum. The internal
references page
Urs Liska-3 wrote
> Now that there seems to be a certain common understanding of my initial
> idea, may I repeat my request for someone to provide a suitable default
> sample document?
> Coming up with a score that provides representative details with as
> little content as possible does
Am 20.09.2018 um 02:09 schrieb Br. Samuel Springuel:
On 9/19/18 6:23 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
Do you have any concerns about the limitations with regard to the use
of the Score Wizard for the Score Wizard's use case too?
The limitations I was worried about were related to the lack of
variety
20 matches
Mail list logo
