Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
PS- update: I figured out the problem, so now it's resolved (and in the process dropped an \include that was loading a whole bunch of libraries I turned out not to need, saving on compile time as well). Thanks again! On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:39 PM N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > Hi Thomas, Ben > > fo

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi Thomas, Ben for some reason, neither of your codes seem to work: I always get arabic numerals in a box if I use \mark \default. I think something is overriding that setting elsewhere in my config files; I'll try to track it down. The MWE Ben sent works just as I want it to on its own, but not i

Re: Force text on line without using \textLengthOn

2018-10-24 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Di., 23. Okt. 2018 um 08:28 Uhr schrieb Urs Liska : > > Hi, > > I want to use TextScript.staff-padding to produce markup elements that > are aligned to their baseline. In order to prevent the texts from moving > vertically to avoid collisions I used \textLengthOn (or its spelled-out > variant):

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Mi., 24. Okt. 2018 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Ben : > This should be what you need (see attached) We do have 'number-format', so one could do: #(define-public (format-roman-mark-numbers mark context) (make-bold-markup (number-format 'roman-upper mark))) #(define-public (format-boxed-roman-mark-n

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Mi., 24. Okt. 2018 um 16:59 Uhr schrieb Ben : > > On 10/24/2018 10:39 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Based on my reading of scm/translation.functions.scm, I have no idea > why the following should not work: > > \version "2.19.82" > > \relative c'' { > \set Score.markFormatter = #(format-mark-gen

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread Ben
On 10/24/2018 9:40 AM, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Hi List, is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using: <>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bold { "IV" } } doesn't work if the voice containing it i

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread Ben
On 10/24/2018 10:39 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:41 AM N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Hi List, is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using: <>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bo

Re: problems in spacing

2018-10-24 Thread Davide Liessi
Dear Massimiliano, a recommendation before addressing your questions. When you write to the list, please always state which LilyPond version you are using, because there can be differences in syntax and behaviour, although in this case the differences are not related to your problems. I assume you

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread David Nalesnik
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:41 AM N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > > Hi List, > > is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants > Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using: > > <>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bold { "IV" } } > > doesn't work if the

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread Ben
On 10/24/2018 9:40 AM, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Hi List, is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using: <>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bold { "IV" } } doesn't work if the voice containing it i

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread Ben
On 10/24/2018 9:40 AM, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Hi List, is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using: <>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bold { "IV" } } doesn't work if the voice containing it i

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread Pierre-Luc Gauthier
Hi Andrew, You could try : { \mark \markup \box "IV" c'4 } HTH Le mer. 24 oct. 2018 à 09:41, N. Andrew Walsh a écrit : > > Hi List, > > is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants > Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using: > > <>^\markup { \raise #4 \r

Re: music-function for ending TextSpanners sometimes fail for skip-events

2018-10-24 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > Am Mi., 24. Okt. 2018 um 01:07 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : >> >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >> > Am Di., 23. Okt. 2018 um 23:54 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : >> > >> >> So you should figure out what your comparison as equal is supposed to be >> >> doing in the first place. >>

set-global-staff-size *inside* \book {}

2018-10-24 Thread Pierre-Luc Gauthier
Hi there, Is this a bug? \version "2.21.0" %#(set-global-staff-size 4) \book { #(set-global-staff-size 4) \score { {\tempo 4=120 c4} \layout {} } } I'm trying to set the global staff size of a single book and I got this strange result. Am I using it wrong? It does work as expected

Re: problems in spacing

2018-10-24 Thread Massimiliano Viel
Thank you for your suggestions! Here below is the code. With system-system-spacing #'basic-distance = #22 I have 2 pages and one system in the 3rd. With system-system-spacing #'basic-distance = #21 I have less than 2 full pages How can I have 2 complete pages?! What do I do wrong? Moreover Fre

Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2018-10-24 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi List, is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using: <>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bold { "IV" } } doesn't work if the voice containing it is resting at that point (or, conversely, I don't k

Re: music-function for ending TextSpanners sometimes fail for skip-events

2018-10-24 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Mi., 24. Okt. 2018 um 01:07 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > Thomas Morley writes: > > > Am Di., 23. Okt. 2018 um 23:54 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > > >> So you should figure out what your comparison as equal is supposed to be > >> doing in the first place. > > > > Yep, that's the culprit. >