On 2020/4/26 17:28, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
The "," trigger the magic. However, I do not find the document about it.
Maybe I am in a wrong way.
In
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/fonts#single-entry-fonts
there's:
"font-name can be described using a comma-separated list of
Hello list,
This might be a tall ask, but is there any way to take a complicated
music expression and after it's fully evaluated replace a note?
It's very typical to have a drum groove that lasts for many bars, but
the very first bar starts with a crash cymbal. What I would like to do
is
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2020-04-26 10:01 am, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Predicates used in argument parsing have to be "primary" in that they
>> have to deliver a result for anything thrown at them.
>> positive? only delivers results for numbers but throws an error for
>> anything else.
>
> Would
On 2020-04-26 10:01 am, David Kastrup wrote:
Predicates used in argument parsing have to be "primary" in that they
have to deliver a result for anything thrown at them.
positive? only delivers results for numbers but throws an error for
anything else.
Would there be harm in redefining an R5RS
Hi David,
> lilypond-book is a regular part of the LilyPond distribution, not a mere
> build dependency.
Yes, I understood. Perhaps my wording was not clear.
When Jonas explained that lilypond-book needs python2, I understood the
lilypond deb-package dependency on python2.
Cheers,
Joram
Okay, I’ve been applying this to my project and came across a problem with the
version I posted earlier: ledger lines are visible for the invisible notes.
Now, I’ve tried applying the line-position function to
LedgerLineSpanner.transparent, but that doesn’t have any effect. There is
> On 26 Apr, 2020, at 1:01 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Predicates used in argument parsing have to be "primary" in that they
> have to deliver a result for anything thrown at them.
>
Can that be noted in the docs
Noeck writes:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> Am 26.04.20 um 16:30 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
>> Yes, 2.20.0 "requires" Python2 for building and scripts like lilypond-
>> book (not for running lilypond itself though).
>
> Ah, lilypond-book makes sense. Because a deb-package does not provide
> the whole building
"Fr. Samuel Springuel" writes:
>> On 26 Apr, 2020, at 4:30 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
>>
>> I've no clue why positive? fails here.
>> Though, for integers >= 0 we have the index? predicate, which works in
>> your function.
>
> Well, I’m glad I’m not the only one baffled. And the index?
Hey everyone,
Thank you all very much for the input. I installed the latest Frescobaldi
and the font wasn't showing in the list.
As it turns out, I hadn't installed them properly.
I dropped the .otf files onto the Windows config screen from a random
folder.
I reinstalled them properly from
Am Sonntag, den 26.04.2020, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Noeck:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> Am 26.04.20 um 16:30 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > Yes, 2.20.0 "requires" Python2 for building and scripts like lilypond-
> > book (not for running lilypond itself though).
>
> Ah, lilypond-book makes sense. Because a
Hi Jonas,
Am 26.04.20 um 16:30 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> Yes, 2.20.0 "requires" Python2 for building and scripts like lilypond-
> book (not for running lilypond itself though).
Ah, lilypond-book makes sense. Because a deb-package does not provide
the whole building environment, does it? So the
> On 26 Apr, 2020, at 4:30 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
>
> I've no clue why positive? fails here.
> Though, for integers >= 0 we have the index? predicate, which works in
> your function.
Well, I’m glad I’m not the only one baffled. And the index? predicate does
seem to work.
> On 26 Apr,
Am Sonntag, den 26.04.2020, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Noeck:
> Hi,
>
> Ubuntu 20.04 comes with lilypond 2.20.0-1
> https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/lilypond
>
> It lists python2 as a dependency (it is actually the only package on my
> system requiring python2).
>
> From recent lilypond-devel mails,
Hi,
Ubuntu 20.04 comes with lilypond 2.20.0-1
https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/lilypond
It lists python2 as a dependency (it is actually the only package on my
system requiring python2).
>From recent lilypond-devel mails, I got the impression that there was a
complete switch to python3 (at
>> The "," trigger the magic. However, I do not find the document about it.
>> Maybe I am in a wrong way.
>
> In
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/fonts#single-entry-fonts
> there's:
> "font-name can be described using a comma-separated list of ‘fonts’
> and a white-space
Am So., 26. Apr. 2020 um 10:32 Uhr schrieb Jinsong Zhao
:
>
> On 2020/4/26 16:09, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > Am So., 26. Apr. 2020 um 09:36 Uhr schrieb Jinsong Zhao
> > :
> >
> >> The "," trigger the magic. However, I do not find the document about it.
> >> Maybe I am in a wrong way.
> >
> > In
> >
Am 26.04.20 um 10:30 schrieb Thomas Morley:
However, when I swap integer? for positive? (to reflect the fact that only a
positive integer should be acceptable) it breaks, telling me the argument at
position 1 is of the wrong type (it’s music, not a positive number). Why
doesn’t scheme’s
On 2020/4/26 16:09, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am So., 26. Apr. 2020 um 09:36 Uhr schrieb Jinsong Zhao
:
The "," trigger the magic. However, I do not find the document about it.
Maybe I am in a wrong way.
In
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/fonts#single-entry-fonts
there's:
Am So., 26. Apr. 2020 um 02:35 Uhr schrieb Fr. Samuel Springuel
:
>
> I’m trying to write a music function in scheme in which the first argument is
> optional and have run into something that confuses me:
>
> The following works:
>
> \version "2.19.84"
>
> recite = #(define-music-function (times
Am 26.04.20 um 09:13 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> In "Times New Roman" the "Roman" is taken as font-family of font
> "Times New", which does not exists, thus a fall-back font is used.
What? :)
(Well, I think I know some background why, but that is still really
unexpected.)
Am So., 26. Apr. 2020 um 09:36 Uhr schrieb Jinsong Zhao
:
> The "," trigger the magic. However, I do not find the document about it.
> Maybe I am in a wrong way.
In
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/fonts#single-entry-fonts
there's:
"font-name can be described using a
On 2020/4/26 15:13, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am So., 26. Apr. 2020 um 04:58 Uhr schrieb Jinsong Zhao
:
I tried your fonts and the demo example, it does not work. I also try
another font, Times New Roman, the most common font on Windows platform.
It does not work, too.
\version "2.20.0"
\header {
Am Sa., 25. Apr. 2020 um 23:36 Uhr schrieb Ignacio Lois <
ignaciol...@gmail.com>:
> AAAH!!
>
> \version "2.19.83"
>
> \header {
> title = \markup {
> \override #'(font-name . "ITC Souvenir")
> "My Title"
> }
> }
>
> \score {
> c''
> }
>
> *Now* that's the
Am So., 26. Apr. 2020 um 04:58 Uhr schrieb Jinsong Zhao
:
> I tried your fonts and the demo example, it does not work. I also try
> another font, Times New Roman, the most common font on Windows platform.
> It does not work, too.
>
> \version "2.20.0"
>
> \header {
> title = \markup {
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
