On 2021-04-06 9:02 pm, Gabriel Borin wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a part based on a manuscript. The arranger took many
liberties on bar count, and since I am just replacing one lost part, I
need
to do 2 things:
- I need the bar count to start at measure 7 (basically, mm.7 = 1).
- I
Hello,
I am working on a part based on a manuscript. The arranger took many
liberties on bar count, and since I am just replacing one lost part, I need
to do 2 things:
- I need the bar count to start at measure 7 (basically, mm.7 = 1).
- I need to exclude a single bar in the middle from
From: lilypond-user
on behalf of Flaming Hakama by Elaine
Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 8:28 PM
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: vertical spacing with chord symbols
Hi,
Does anyone know how to get chord symbols to be higher up?
I think they are too close to the notes on the staff.
Hi,
Does anyone know how to get chord symbols to be higher up?
I think they are too close to the notes on the staff.
I've tried messing with the VerticalAxisGroup stuff mentioned in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/internals/chordnames
but none of it seems to work for me.
I've
Before i make a new push
Push done :
Github
https://github.com/gilles-th/arranger.ly
Direct access :
http://gillesth.free.fr/Lilypond/arranger-GIT-copy/arranger.ly.zip
It seems that in my last push, I've changed the signature of the
tempos function ! I don't understand why or how i did
Le 2021-04-06 17:34, Stefan Thomas a écrit :
Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64]
Deleting `/tmp/lilypond-JkJ8B6'...
Wrong type (expecting pair): ()
fatal error: failed files: "/tmp/lyp/wrappers/arangertest.ly"
Oh sorry. It's my bad
It seems that in my last push, I've changed
Dear community,
I' ve tried, for the 1st time, arranger.ly.
I copied some code from the Docs. Unfortunately it didn't work as expected.
I could compile the file but I can't see the metronome markings.
Could it be possible that lyp and and arranger.ly exclude each other?
Here' s my file:
>
> [...] I wrote up the start of something that could someday resemble
> an introduction to extending and a guide covering programming
> topics. [...]
This looks very good, thanks!
> On the long-term, this might make its way into the official
> documentation in an adapted form.
Yes, please!