On 12/29/21, 6:20 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of David M. Boothe, CAS"
wrote:
I have a score in 2.18, one section of which uses with the following code:
\tempo \markup { \pad-to-box #'(0 . 0) #'(8 . 10)
\concat {
{ \override #'(font-name . "
I'm about to rant about an existing Lilyond default. Really I want to
suggest a change for the developers, but I'm not sure where or how to do
that. So I'll start with this rant, and I'll be happy to take any more
productive steps if someone can suggest what they should be. Or, if
this issue has
Minimal example:
\version "2.23.1"
\include "articulate.ly"
\articulate {
c''1\trill |
}
Is this something addressed between 2.23.1 (which I have installed)
and 2.23.5 (current)?
—Joel C. Salomon
I have a score in 2.18, one section of which uses with the following code:
\tempo \markup { \pad-to-box #'(0 . 0) #'(8 . 10)
\concat {
{ \override #'(font-name . "Linux Biolinum Slanted")
\fontsize #1 "Musette " }
(
\small \general-align #
yep that helped a lot. Thanks.
j
On 2021-12-29 15:34, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 12/29/21, 3:25 PM, "jh" wrote:
very curious. So your example printed better than mine the
footnote is
very close to the edge and the top is very far down.
So I opened librewriter cut the margins to .
On 12/29/21, 3:25 PM, "jh" wrote:
very curious. So your example printed better than mine the footnote is
very close to the edge and the top is very far down.
So I opened librewriter cut the margins to .5 and filled the top and two
lines of text at the bottom and there is no
very curious. So your example printed better than mine the footnote is
very close to the edge and the top is very far down.
So I opened librewriter cut the margins to .5 and filled the top and two
lines of text at the bottom and there is no loss at the bottom and no
extra space at the top.
So t
On Wed, Dec 29 2021 at 12:09:12 -0700, jh wrote:
thanks- not sure what to do next the printer settings are as expected.
will have to think some more about it I guess.
I remember that Frescobaldi had an issue with printing; can't remember
if it was fixed.
I see some reports in the tracker:
ht
On 12/29/21, 12:09 PM, "jh" wrote:
thanks- not sure what to do next the printer settings are as expected.
will have to think some more about it I guess.
J
Here's the pdf I created. See if it prints for you.
Carl
Jay-Hamilton-24-5-Dec.pdf
Description: Jay-Hamilton-
thanks- not sure what to do next the printer settings are as expected.
will have to think some more about it I guess.
j
On 2021-12-29 12:02, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I added a score to your file to make it pring something.
It generates a perfect PDF on my system. No extra space at the top or
bott
I added a score to your file to make it pring something.
It generates a perfect PDF on my system. No extra space at the top or bottom.
\version "2.22.0"
\header {
title = "24-5 Dec"
subtitle = "chaconne"
composer = "Jay Hamilton"
copyright = \markup { \tiny \override #'(baseline-skip .
attached is the header I use as you can see it is Letter.
Brian suggests that it's the printer and his test does suggest that it
is the printer; But no other pdf produced by other software has this
problem all the others (3) print with an expected top margin and bottom
margin.
So I'm stuck, I'd
On 12/29/21, 9:22 AM, "lilypond-user on behalf of jh"
wrote:
hello using 2.22 and current version of Frescobaldi. using 'letter' and
a new printer Canon
lately the top margin above the header has gotten wider and the footnote
(2 lines smaller font) on the first page of scor
hello using 2.22 and current version of Frescobaldi. using 'letter' and
a new printer Canon
lately the top margin above the header has gotten wider and the footnote
(2 lines smaller font) on the first page of scores is getting cut off or
the bottom line is cut in half.
Is the easy solution to
Le 26/12/2021 à 10:43, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
[...] What must I do to get, for example,
Balloon text
/
/
grob
this alignment? Please advise.
One solution is to wait for the patch that
Will do.
Thanks,
-Tom
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:42 AM Knute Snortum wrote:
> This sounds like something that should be treated as a possible bug.
> Manual changes go in the bug tracker too. Here's what to do:
>
> https://lilypond.org/bug-reports.html
>
> --
> Knute Snortum
>
>
>
> On Wed, De
Le 29/12/2021 à 09:45, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
A cleaner and more surgical solution would be:
\version "2.18"
#(assoc-set! (assoc-ref default-script-alist "tenuto") 'padding 0.5)
\new Staff {
\relative c'' {\time 3/4 a g e--}
}
Although this approach manipulates internal data structur
This sounds like something that should be treated as a possible bug.
Manual changes go in the bug tracker too. Here's what to do:
https://lilypond.org/bug-reports.html
--
Knute Snortum
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 6:03 AM Tom Sgouros wrote:
>
> Hello all:
>
> I wonder if the "system" entry in the
Thank you for all the answers! The solution that best suits my situation is
overriding the script.padding, what Vaughan suggested. I find the staccatos to
be too close to notes as well, so having it affect all articulations doesn't
seem like a problem (at least at the moment). As Lukas pointed o
Hello all:
I wonder if the "system" entry in the glossary might be enhanced by
including the lilypond-specific definition. Currently it reads like this:
"The collection of staves (staff), two or more, as used for writing down
keyboard, chamber, choral, or orchestral music; a section of the score
Thank you all (and Brian, who replied directly) for your suggestions.
Proportional notation seems to do what I need, simply, but the other seems
worth investigating.
-Tom
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 4:02 AM Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> Consider using proportional notation to ensure th
Hello Tom,
Consider using proportional notation to ensure there is always space for note
values as small as you need them.
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Mittwoch, 29. Dezember 2021, 00:18:24 CET schrieb Tom Sgouros:
> Hello all:
>
> How can I set a minimum measure size? I want to make some scratch
> eng
Hello Erika,
the problem here is that Lilypond handles many Articulations the same way. So
overriding Script.padding will affect all articulations.
We have recently discussed possibilites to override properties for specific
articulations, but if you are using the shorthand -- for tenuto then yo
Hi Erika,
I would like to have the tenuto mark a bit farther away from the note.
I had a similar issue with tuplet numbers and then "\override
TupletNumber.Y-offset = #-2.5" fixed the issue. I don't know what I
should replace "TupletNumber" by in the case of tenuto lines.
Minimal example her
24 matches
Mail list logo
