Re: Possible bug: Grace note at the beginning makes instrumentName disappear?

Thank you David for this lesson, I appreciate it a lot. Thomas > Am 16.02.2022 um 18:50 schrieb David Kastrup : > > Thomas Scharkowski writes: > >> Grace note at the beginning makes instrumentName disappear: >> macOs 12.1 >> LilyPond 2.23.6 >> >> -- >> \version "2.23.6" >> >> GraceVoice =

Re: LilyPond 2.23.6 released

Le 16/02/2022 à 15:37, Thomas Scharkowski a écrit : Hi all, I installed this version today, everything seems to work. It might be of interest that the MacPorts version of 2.23.6 runs around three times faster on my MacBookPro M1, macOs 12.1 Carver Missa compile times are 28,6“ and 10,3“

Slur in different voices

Hi. I have a score that, in the piano, has a slur crossing voices (in the example the slur would end up with the B being held for a 4 count). There is a note in the LP manual saying that slurs must all stay in the same voice, so is there a work-around for this kind of thing? Many thanks!

Re: Failure to properly display appoggiatura inside a repeat volta

Thank you, David! So obvious, right in front of my nose. On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 2:37 PM David Kastrup wrote: > > Kenneth Wolcott writes: > > > Hi;; > > > > I'm trying to engrave the 8notes.com's Voice+Piano arrangement of > > "Take Me Out to the Ball Game". I decided to skip the lyrics for

Re: Failure to properly display appoggiatura inside a repeat volta

Thank you, Leo! So obvious, right in front of my nose. On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 2:42 PM Leo Correia de Verdier wrote: > > It’s the most classic of lilypond issues showing up again. Insert s16*3 in > the same place in the other staves and it will go away. (What happens is that > piano right hand

Re: Failure to properly display appoggiatura inside a repeat volta

Kenneth Wolcott writes: > Hi;; > > I'm trying to engrave the 8notes.com's Voice+Piano arrangement of > "Take Me Out to the Ball Game". I decided to skip the lyrics for now > and replace the corresponding notes with a trumpet. > > I'm having a problem correctly displaying appoggiatura that

Re: Possible bug: Grace note at the beginning makes instrumentName disappear?

Thomas Scharkowski writes: > Grace note at the beginning makes instrumentName disappear: > macOs 12.1 > LilyPond 2.23.6 > > -- > \version "2.23.6" > > GraceVoice = \new Voice > { > \grace > c'8 b4 > } > > GraceStaff = \new Staff > << > \set Staff.instrumentName = "Grace" >

Re: Possible bug: Grace note at the beginning makes instrumentName disappear?

Greetings Thomas, In the case of grace notes, the instrumentName must be placed in a \with block. GraceStaff = \new Staff \with { instrumentName = #"Grace" } << \GraceVoice >> Not sure if the curly and angled braces work exactly the same way, because I haven't done this with variables,

Possible bug: Grace note at the beginning makes instrumentName disappear?

Grace note at the beginning makes instrumentName disappear: macOs 12.1 LilyPond 2.23.6 -- \version "2.23.6" GraceVoice = \new Voice { \grace c'8 b4 } GraceStaff = \new Staff << \set Staff.instrumentName = "Grace" \GraceVoice >> \score { \GraceStaff } NoGraceVoice = \new Voice {

Re: LilyPond 2.23.6 released

Hi all, I installed this version today, everything seems to work. It might be of interest that the MacPorts version of 2.23.6 runs around three times faster on my MacBookPro M1, macOs 12.1 Carver Missa compile times are 28,6“ and 10,3“ MacPorts version. Thomas > Am 08.02.2022 um 14:07

Re: Add text to score without affecting spacing

Hi Aaron, > There are a number of grobs that normally have no visual representation. You > could attach your content there This is really clever! Can you imagine *any* possible downside to this approach? Thanks, Kieren.

Re: LilyPond 2.23.6 released

Am Samstag, dem 12.02.2022 um 21:12 +0800 schrieb Jinsong Zhao: > Hello developers, > > The other issue I have encountered is in LilyPond 2.23.6/guile 2.2 is > the following code will cause error: > > \version "2.23.6" > > \header { > title = \markup \override #'(font-name . "思源黑体 HW Bold")

Re: Font kerning

> Of course, what it means to “conform as much as possible to the original > layout” is the question at hand. If purely visual, your code is > correct; if purely semantic, “vº1º”/“vº2º” is correct (however the font > displays that); if both together, then a font with appropriate letter > and

Re: skip-of-length and \unfoldRepeats

>>> Now that I know to look for it, the definition of `\skip` in >>> >>> does describe this behavior. But I would never have found this on >>> my own. >> >> OK, how did you search exactly? Where