Hi Valentin, thank you this is super interesting. There's a lot of
information in there I want to read more carefully,
but for the moment I have one question: when is after-line-breaking invoke?
Or actually, better question: where do I go to discover when (and I guess
by what) after-line-breaking
Hi Brian;
Thank you for your patience with me.
I found the 2.23.6-1 doc tarball, downloaded it and made a web
browser bookmark to it just like I did for 2.22.1 docs.
I then carefully read section 1.2.5, looking for my situation.
Since I am printing bar numbers in the default manner,
At 14:36 20/02/2022 -0800, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
I'm not sure I totally understand your response.
Evidently so.
I'd like to see the bar number displayed on the next line as that is
when the incomplete measure is completed.
What, please, makes you think I didn't understand that?
I indeed
Am So., 20. Feb. 2022 um 22:41 Uhr schrieb Luca Fascione :
> a) I'm looking for a way to get the fingerings where I want them without
> using one-note-chord tricks
Well, for Fingerings not in chord, like b-1 or -2-1 X-parent
is NoteColumn _not_ NoteHead, Y-parent is VerticalAxisGroup.
There is
Hi Brian;
I'm not sure I totally understand your response.
I'd like to see the bar number displayed on the next line as that is
when the incomplete measure is completed.
Perhaps that is an incorrect expectation.
I indeed hope that with the next release I'll be able to have the
bar
Hello,
our problem here is that such things like the positioning of beams are not
known for quite some time. But we could use something like after-line-breaking
to adjust the results. Somewhat like here.
Valentin
Am Sonntag, 20. Februar 2022, 21:17:31 CET schrieb Luca Fascione:
> So... would
Thanks Jean,
I thought a somewhat more complete example of the configurations I'm
looking at would help get a sense of the scope of the problem,
and also that the solution would be an easy "do this" or "look here" kind
of answer.
My concern with a tiny example is that it risks to create a rather
Le 20/02/2022 à 21:17, Luca Fascione a écrit :
So... would anybody be able to lend a hand here please?
Many thanks
Luca
It would be helpful if you provided smaller examples.
I'm not saying this as a reprimand, but as friendly
advice on how to get people to help you. Personally,
I had
So... would anybody be able to lend a hand here please?
Many thanks
Luca
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 7:49 PM Luca Fascione wrote:
> Hello,
> sorry for the double-post, I'm unsure whether this should go to -user or
> -devel.
>
> I'm looking for some guidance to set up fingering on classical guitar
Am Sa., 19. Feb. 2022 um 19:45 Uhr schrieb Paul Hodges :
>
> I am trying to set the attached image (both staves are bass clef). I have
> written the tuplet (without the note on the top staff in the first chord) in
> my lower staff voice and jumping between staves as required; the missing note
Hello Jean
Wow! Thank you for an excellent 9-minute response!
Already tested your solution and everything worked perfectly.
You have saved me a lot of time typing AND increased the clarity of my code.
I see: Scheme and Lilypond code. Aha. I understand. Thank you SO much for
your detailed and
Le 20/02/2022 à 15:26, Jeremiah Reilly a écrit :
I have a problem which I cannot figure out.
Lilypond has a built-in function to engrave guitar fingerings in a score.
The function works just fine, but is long and cumbersome to type, for
example:
\rightHandFinger #2 /(#2 = i = index
I have a problem which I cannot figure out.
Lilypond has a built-in function to engrave guitar fingerings in a score.
The function works just fine, but is long and cumbersome to type, for
example:
\rightHandFinger #2 *(#2 = i = index finger)*
which fingers the attached note with the
Update: Installing Lilypond on a Mac running MacOS 12.1 Monterrey and
installing Frescobaldi as a front-end.
I got everything working and can engrave music. What a joy. See attached
sample output.
Initially I encountered a bug which threw an Typeerror:
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for
Valentin
The animated Lilypond score was a blast. Great work.
Jeremiah
> Am 20.02.2022 um 10:16 schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
>
>
>
> Le 20/02/2022 à 10:13, Thomas Scharkowski a écrit :
>> Sorry, couldn’t get the patched lily.scm to run - certainly a mistake on my
>> side.
>> If you like you can send a correct patched lily.scm to me?
>>
>> Thomas
>
> Here you
Hi Thomas,
maybe this can be handy: the `moreutils` package has a utility called `ts`,
that will prepend a timestamp to each line of output.
If you pipe the output of your compilation into it, you can get timing
information quite easily, here's an example:
% ls | ts -s "%H:%M:%.S"
00:00:00.13
Quick answer: I can notice the speed difference in the terminal output from the
very start.
I will try the diff later.
Thomas
> Am 19.02.2022 um 20:12 schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
>
> Le 19/02/2022 à 16:41, Thomas Scharkowski a écrit :
>> One more test:
>> I installed both versions on a 2013 iMac
18 matches
Mail list logo
