Werner LEMBERG writes:
> Dear LilyPonders,
>
>
> I can get the extents of a grob with `ly:grob-extent`. What is the
> corresponding Scheme function to set the extents?
>
> Or to ask in a different way: At the time when properties are
> processed and you have to manipulate stencils, changing the
>> Or to ask in a different way: At the time when properties are
>> processed and you have to manipulate stencils, changing the stencil
>> of a grob doesn't change the extents of this grob, AFAICS.
>
> You are not supposed to change stencils at all. They are not
> entities with identity.
>
> C
I need a custom spanner that has x sections with different symbols. This is
going to be tricky so any help is appreciated.
I already have a hacky solution for fixed length spanners but it is pain to
maintain it. I'd like a more usable solution that can handle variable
lengths.
It would be nice to
Hi Dimitris,
> I need a custom spanner that has x sections with different symbols. This is
> going to be tricky so any help is appreciated.
https://github.com/davidnalesnik/lilypond-text-spanner-inner-texts
Hope that helps!
Kieren.
> There is a problem with ligatures at the syllable boundaries (and
> kerning). [...] it is not sufficient to shift the right syllable
> in a syllable pair to the left. Instead, the following should be
> done. [...]
Meanwhile I could implement this :-)
I will submit a MR soon.
Werner
Le 14/04/2022 à 17:39, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
There is a problem with ligatures at the syllable boundaries (and
kerning). [...] it is not sufficient to shift the right syllable
in a syllable pair to the left. Instead, the following should be
done. [...]
Meanwhile I could implement this :-)
Le 14/04/2022 à 11:41, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
Or to ask in a different way: At the time when properties are
processed and you have to manipulate stencils, changing the stencil
of a grob doesn't change the extents of this grob, AFAICS.
You are not supposed to change stencils at all. They are n
> How did you do that? Sorry to rain on your parade, but I would not
> want you to put a lot of work in it if it will not be of mergeable
> quality.
Attached. In the end the necessary modifications were surprisingly
minor. Please comment, there is certainly room for improvements.
Werner
Le 14/04/2022 à 16:09, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
Hi Dimitris,
I need a custom spanner that has x sections with different symbols. This is
going to be tricky so any help is appreciated.
https://github.com/davidnalesnik/lilypond-text-spanner-inner-texts
Ok, I'm not sure if this solves the p
Hi;
Off-topic: What do you guys think of the upside-down music?
On youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrLBkLxyE7T1cyv_4ykGTrg
Upside-down Scores
Example:
Für Elise Upside-down (new version, with Score)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2vsAua8FxM
How is this done? Can this be done wi
Le 14/04/2022 à 21:58, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
Hi;
Off-topic: What do you guys think of the upside-down music?
On youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrLBkLxyE7T1cyv_4ykGTrg
Upside-down Scores
Example:
Für Elise Upside-down (new version, with Score)
https://www.youtube.com/watc
I often find myself in need of offsetting some tempo or rehearsal marks for
certain parts but not the full score but tags won't work in this case since
I can't have two marks at the same location on a single context. It is a
lot of work to duplicate the whole context just to differentiate a few
mar
I am having trouble with arpeggios and grace notes again. In this
situation, I have a cross-staff arpeggio of a chord with a grace note
(see attachment). LilyPond's default is to put the arpeggio and grace
note on top of each other. Jean taught me the trick of putting the
arpeggio on the grace n
Hi all,
On 4/6/22 20:17, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 06/04/2022 à 14:33, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>> Is someone taking care of bugs in the magnetic snapping lyrics
>> engraver? Here is an example where it fails to position lyrics
>> correctly (see last system in the image).
>>
>>
>> Werner
>
I think there might be a more beautiful solutions to your whole situation, but
I’m too tired to figure it out right now, so:
You can change the arpeggio’s Y-extent to prevent it from pushing away the
other staff.
%%%
\version "2.22.2"
rightHand = {
e'2
}
leftHand = \relative {
\clef bass
Le 14/04/2022 à 23:06, Knute Snortum a écrit :
I am having trouble with arpeggios and grace notes again. In this
situation, I have a cross-staff arpeggio of a chord with a grace note
(see attachment). LilyPond's default is to put the arpeggio and grace
note on top of each other. Jean taught
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 2:23 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>> You can change the arpeggio’s Y-extent to prevent it from pushing away the
>> other staff.
...
> The magic incantation would be \tweak vertical-skylines ##f.
Thanks Jean and Leo, those work great!
--
Knute Snortum
Le 14/04/2022 à 18:18, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
How did you do that? Sorry to rain on your parade, but I would not
want you to put a lot of work in it if it will not be of mergeable
quality.
Attached. In the end the necessary modifications were surprisingly
minor. Please comment, there is cer
Le 14/04/2022 à 22:44, Dimitris Marinakis a écrit :
I often find myself in need of offsetting some tempo or rehearsal
marks for certain parts but not the full score but tags won't work in
this case since I can't have two marks at the same location on a
single context.
Not sure I understand th
Thanks, Jean! This is cool! Not that I would do anything with it,
but it sure is nice to know that there seems to be no limit to what
Lilypond can do :-)
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 14/04/2022 à 21:58, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
> > Hi;
> >
> >Off-topic:
>> Attached. In the end the necessary modifications were surprisingly
>> minor. Please comment, there is certainly room for improvements.
>
> Thanks. This is a bit what I feared: in this state, there is
> potential for things going wrong with other after-line-breaking
> callbacks. Those are th
>> How did you do that? Sorry to rain on your parade, but I would not
>> want you to put a lot of work in it if it will not be of mergeable
>> quality.
>
> Attached. In the end the necessary modifications were surprisingly
> minor. Please comment, there is certainly room for improvements.
Att
22 matches
Mail list logo
