Re: bar check problems with a repeat volta whose first ending is an incomplete bar

Hi Kenneth Le jeu. 12 janv. 2023 à 07:30, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit : ... > It is bar #8 that is the incomplete bar in the first repeat volta, > ... Two possibilities: a) ignore the warning, since it compiles OK; b) Change the measure length for each voice for this specific measure: \set

Re: sustain to-barline? LP 2.24.0

Hi; However, placing the sustain pedal actions in the Dynamic Context means that the pedal actions show up below the treble clef rather than below the bass clef. This, of course, interferes with hairpins and dynamics. I'd like an RFE to have a sustainContext that pairs with the lower staff

Re: sustain to-barline? LP 2.24.0

Hi; Now that's weird :-) Now the sustain pedal bracket style is working as desired. Thanks, Ken On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 9:04 PM Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > > Hi; > > Placing the sustain pedal actions in the Dynamics Context results in > the sustain pedal bracket style being ignored,

Re: sustain to-barline? LP 2.24.0

Hi; Placing the sustain pedal actions in the Dynamics Context results in the sustain pedal bracket style being ignored, reverting to the default style. Thanks, Ken On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 8:50 PM Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > > Hi; > > I decided to place my sustain pedal commands in the

Re: sustain to-barline? LP 2.24.0

Hi; I decided to place my sustain pedal commands in the Dynamics Context; I hope that solves the problem. Thanks, Ken On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 7:29 PM Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > > Hi; > > sustain to-barline? LP 2.24.0 > > I'd like to have the sustain pedal terminate at the bar line, not at >

Re: Image width issue

Hi Jean, Thanks for your help this works. But I have a question, this solution makes the 1st image match the width of the 2nd image by reducing it. Can the 2nd images width match the  1st images width by increasing it. Thanks once again for all the help. Raj On 1/11/2023 2:34 AM, Jean Abou

Re: Tricky repeat structure for "32-bar form" AABA

Looks like the function version works. Interestingly, swapping `\after \duration $A \volta 2 \fine` with `\volta 2 \after \duration $A \fine` causes the unfolded music to be missing the AA part. I’ve noticed a tricky interplay between `\after` and `\volta *x*` previously. —Joel \version "2.24.0"

Tricky repeat structure for "32-bar form" AABA

If I understand correctly, a volta repeat within a D.C. repeat is only supposed to play the first time. I’ve worked out how to accomplish this in the presence of `\unfoldRepeats` (as useful for MIDI creation) in the context of a “thirty-two-bar form”, or AABA-form, song. Might be useful to

sustain to-barline? LP 2.24.0

Hi; sustain to-barline? LP 2.24.0 I'd like to have the sustain pedal terminate at the bar line, not at the last note in the staff. Is there a "to-barline" setting for the sustain pedal? I searched for "to-barline" and found nothing regarding the sustain pedal. I looked at the mailing

defineBarLine confusion

I'm trying to understand how to use defineBarLine, based on the documentation in Notation Reference 1.2.5, and bar-line.scm. The meaning of the "bartype" argument seems to not be exactly explained anywhere, but from what is said (mostly in bar-line.scm), and a lot of experimentation, I deduce

Re: NOT merging same notes in different voices

Jean-Julien Fleck writes: > Hello Joei, > > Le mer. 11 janv. 2023 à 16:23, Johannes Roeßler a écrit : > >> Hi Group, >> >> how can I avoid that the same notes in two voices are merged? >> >> \version "2.24.0" >> <<{ a'4 }\\{ a' }>> >> > > Instantiating explicitly the voices can help: > > <<\new

Re: NOT merging same notes in different voices

If you use \omit instead of \hide there will be no invisible stem for the tenuto lines to avoid. HTH /Leo > 11 jan. 2023 kl. 17:43 skrev Johannes Roeßler : > >  > Hi Group, > > how can I have a "tenuto" line directly at the note (and not above or below > the invisible stem?). > > I have

NOT merging same notes in different voices

Hi Group, how can I have a "tenuto" line directly at the note (and not above or below the invisible stem?). I have two stemless voices in one staff. 8< \version "2.24.0" <<{\hide Staff.Stem a4--  }\\{\hide Staff.Stem c4-- }>> -->8 Best regards Joei

Re: NOT merging same notes in different voices

Hello Joei, Le mer. 11 janv. 2023 à 16:23, Johannes Roeßler a écrit : > Hi Group, > > how can I avoid that the same notes in two voices are merged? > > \version "2.24.0" > <<{ a'4 }\\{ a' }>> > Instantiating explicitly the voices can help: <<\new Voice { a'4 }\\ \new Voice { a' }>> Cheers,

NOT merging same notes in different voices

Hi Group, how can I avoid that the same notes in two voices are merged? \version "2.24.0" <<{ a'4 }\\{ a' }>> Best regards Joei

Re: Feedback request on image formats

SVG preferred over PDF. Thank you for asking. On 2023-01-11 06:40, Benjamin Tordoff wrote: Almost all the images I use for cover art etc are JPEG or PNG originally so for me PNG is the most important format. Other images I use are generally icons or clip art and these are almost always png

Re: alteration-glyph-name-alist location?

Le 11/01/2023 à 00:10, leonardlthomp...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi. Does anyone know which file in the installation has the definition of the alteration-glyph-name-alist variable ? Or alterationGlyphs ?  I'm trying to access how triple sharps and triple flats get engraved. Thanks! Hello, For

Re: Image width issue

Le 11/01/2023 à 01:38, Rajesh Baskar a écrit : Hi Jean, I don't know if I'm doing this wrong as suggested by you, but I'm still not getting the results. The main point is not using \tweak transparent ##t, but using the same drawing for the note heads in both cases so that they have the

alteration-glyph-name-alist location?

Hi. Does anyone know which file in the installation has the definition of the alteration-glyph-name-alist variable ? Or alterationGlyphs ? I'm trying to access how triple sharps and triple flats get engraved. Thanks! LT