Re: Polyphonic piano writing - beam directions

2023-08-09 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Am 09.08.23 um 03:12 schrieb William Rehwinkel via LilyPond user discussion: \version "2.25.7" \new PianoStaff <<   \new Staff = "up" \relative g' { \voiceTwo g16 e c \change Staff = "do" \voiceOne g e g \change Staff = "up" \voiceTwo c e}   \new Staff = "do" \with {\clef bass } s2 >> This

Re: Polyphonic piano writing - beam directions

2023-08-09 Thread David Kastrup
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes: >   \new Staff = down \with { \clef bass } { That sentiment was part of why I chose to switch from tenor to male alto instead of bass. An easier change for sight-reading. -- David Kastrup

One-page page-turning

2023-08-09 Thread Pierre-Luc Gauthier
Hi there, I see tablets proliferating in orchestras. And I rather like it because updates to the charts are trivial for those not needing a printer. So, rather than the traditional "two-side" page arrangement, is there a way to have the ly:page-turn-breaking function to work for a "one-sided" docu

Re: One-page page-turning

2023-08-09 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le mercredi 09 août 2023 à 09:47 -0400, Pierre-Luc Gauthier a écrit : > I see tablets proliferating in orchestras. And I rather like it > because updates to the charts are trivial for those not needing a > printer. So, rather than the traditional "two-side" page arrangement, > is there a way to hav

footnote in any markup

2023-08-09 Thread Richard Shann
I've noticed that the following does not work: 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8>< \version "2.24.1" \score { { a'4 f' ^\markup { "A simple" \auto-footnote "tune" \italic " By me" } g'4 } } 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8>< I'm guessing this

Re: footnote in any markup

2023-08-09 Thread Richard Shann
Reading over the docs again, I see that this is what is meant by "footnotes outside of music expressions". Sorry for the noise. Richard Shann On Wed, 2023-08-09 at 15:36 +0100, Richard Shann wrote: > I've noticed that the following does not work: > > 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8>

Re: Polyphonic piano writing - beam directions

2023-08-09 Thread Jin Choi
Thanks everyone. I was able to get what I wanted with your suggestions. Anything I could be doing better in this snippet? \version "2.24.1" top = { \change Staff = "upper" \voiceTwo } bottom = { \change Staff = "lower" \voiceOne } upper = \relative c'' { \new Voice { \voiceOne r4 d\(-

Re: One-page page-turning

2023-08-09 Thread Valentin Petzel
Hi Pierre-Luc, if you feel confident building from source I’ve changed the code such that page-turn-breaking will do a turn after each single page unless two-sided is set true: https://gitlab.com/vpetzel/lilypond/-/tree/single_turn_breaking Cheers, Valentin Am Mittwoch, 9. August 2023, 15:47:

Re: One-page page-turning

2023-08-09 Thread Pierre-Luc Gauthier
Le mer. 9 août 2023, à 12 h 55, Valentin Petzel a écrit : > if you feel confident building from source I do ! And I did !! And it works !!! > I’ve changed the code such that > page-turn-breaking will do a turn after each single page unless two-sided is > set true O_O! Thank, you, so, much !

Re: One-page page-turning

2023-08-09 Thread Paul Hodges
From: Pierre-Luc Gauthier I understand from your code that this opens up the door to an arbitrary number of pages, say, a 3 page bloc. 'Could be fun ! This isn't necessarily a joke!  Both the last score I did (now in print) and the one I'm working on have fold-out pages to make the op

Re: Polyphonic piano writing - beam directions

2023-08-09 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Am 09.08.23 um 13:34 schrieb David Kastrup: Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:   \new Staff = down \with { \clef bass } { That sentiment was part of why I chose to switch from tenor to male alto instead of bass. An easier change for sight-reading. :-) :-) All the clefs (and all the keys) are o

Re: One-page page-turning

2023-08-09 Thread Valentin Petzel
Theoretically yes, but this would require more specific implementations,as current implementation of special cases only work for n = 2 and do not matter for n = 1. Am Mittwoch, 9. August 2023, 19:14:58 CEST schrieb Pierre-Luc Gauthier: > I understand from your code that this opens up the door to