For pieces I write I often use the format where the \time is presented
as a number and a notehead. I have used the same code to do this for
many a year withour a problem. However with the update to lilypond
version 2.22.0 the solution is broken and returns a fatal error
'make-note-markup' and '
Suddenly I get an error. Output still looks normal. I have updated to
2.22.0 quite a few months ago and have been working with that version
since. Without any problems. Nothing has changed as far as I know
Lilypond 2.22.0 for Windows
errormessage: C:/Program Files
(x86)/LilyPond/usr/share/lily
I'm looking for a way of making a note of indetermined length that looks
like a breve note.
The note might be 50*4 on the first system, then the system
automatically breaks. The note then gets tied to the new system where
the note might be of 101*8 (or any other length). There would be no
visib
I'm looking for a way to create a note of indetermined length. It should
look like a Breve. But at one line it may be 50*4 long. Then the line
breaks and it might be 111*8 long (etc). But still looking the same. The
note needs in all other ways to behave like a normal note. A real life
example
I would like to keep the accidental created above the e! within the
bounds of the larger slur (from f2 ending on e1)
This is what I came up with. The accidental is created but is kept above
the slur. The internal documentation suggested to me this would work (it
reads: inside adjusts the slur i
In a score that has no barlines I have used
\omit Staff.BarLine
Which indeed leaves out the barlines. But the space and padding, which
the barline would normally use, remain.
%%
\version "2.22.1"
\fixed c {
\time 4\4
\omit Staff.BarLine
a4 a a a |
b b b b }
%%
Would give a very visible differ
In a score that has no barlines I have used
\omit Staff.BarLine
Which indeed leaves out the barlines. But the space and padding, which
the barline would normally use, remain.
%%
\version "2.22.1"
\fixed c {
\time 4\4
\omit Staff.BarLine
a4 a a a |
b b b b }
%%
Would give a very visible differenc
I have a score with multiple instruments where some instruments have the
\appoggiatura, but the voices above (and/or) below are simple straight
voices.
When compiling the score the voice without the \appoggiatura looks
uneven. There is extra space between the notes where in the other voice
is t
Lukas-Fabian Moser"
Aan: "E Appeldoorn" ; "lilypond-user Mailing List
(lilypond-user@gnu.org)"
Verzonden: 1-12-2021 20:48:52
Onderwerp: Re: justify
Hi Erik,
please keep replies on-list so anybody can chime in and/or participate.
Am 01.12.21 um 20:47 schrieb E Appeldo
The score is in 4/4 throughout. Perhave I have made a mistake somewhere
that I now can't trace.
vriendelijke groet, Erik Appeldoorn
-- Origineel bericht --
Van: "Lukas-Fabian Moser"
Aan: "E Appeldoorn" ; "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Verzonden: 1-12-2
HI all and merry christmas
A couple of weeks ago I had a question about a spacing problem I have in
a score. After many trials that did not solve anything I'm coming to the
conclusion that there might be a bug with the \appoggiatura and the
\acciaccatura. I did try the options you then gave me
While the strict note spacing does solve the problems lilypond throws up
during this bar it does create a load more along the way in other bars.
Just showing one other bar that looks suddenly awfull with strict
spacing
<<
\new Staff \relative c'' {
es4-- r8
\tuplet 5/4 {f32([ ges as ges f)]
being a bug.
PS I did not expect to get stuck, but it seems that the end result in
this score leaves to be desired.
-- Origineel bericht --
Van: "Lukas-Fabian Moser"
Aan: "E Appeldoorn" ; "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Verzonden: 25-12-2021 20:44:22
Onderwer
t;Lukas-Fabian Moser"
Aan: "E Appeldoorn" ; "Hans Aikema"
; "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Verzonden: 25-12-2021 21:14:18
Onderwerp: Re: possible bug?
Hi Erik,
Just showing one other bar that looks suddenly awfull with strict
spacing
<<
\new Staff \relat
\new Staff
{
c'16 d' e' d' e' d' c' d' f' e' d' c'
}
>>
There are no words. The embellished notes just disappear. Sorry if I
misunderstood.
vriendelijke groet, Erik Appeldoorn
-- Origineel bericht --
Van: "Valent
I have a score consisting of 5 strings. Near the end all instrument
voices (except the bass) split into two. The top voice being a solo, and
the bottom one the rest. I have managed this for one voice, but can't
figure out how to add second violin, viola, and cello in the same
manner, then addin
Thanks Lukas, I would never have figured that out.
-- Origineel bericht --
Van: "Lukas-Fabian Moser"
Aan: "E Appeldoorn" ; "Lilypond"
Verzonden: 17-2-2022 22:08:09
Onderwerp: Re: Splitting voices
Hi Erik,
I have a score consisting of 5 strings. Near
I wanted to move a TrillSpann downwards to within the bar on the middle
barline.
I finaly came up with
\once \override TrillSpanner.Y-offset = #-2 \startTrillSpan a4*5
\stopTrillSpan
But got an error 'unbound TrillSpannEvent' and nothing has changed.
So how do I move that TrillSpanner southward
iendelijke groet, Erik Appeldoorn
-- Origineel bericht --
Van: "Valentin Petzel"
Aan: "Lilypond"
CC: "E Appeldoorn"
Verzonden: 16-3-2022 19:58:22
Onderwerp: Re: trillspan
Hello Erik,
\startTrillSpan is a post event, so you need to specify it after the note you
I'm looking for a way to further extend the tempo mark
I know about the simple version
\relative c'' {
\tempo \markup {
\concat {
\bold "Andante appasionata "
"("
\lower #-0.5 \note {4} #UP
" ("
\lower #-0.5 \note {4.} #UP
") = 42)"
}
}
a1
Now
LP 2.18.2
I would like to use the \undertie for syllables in lyrics that should be
kept together. The \undertie is input with the notes. The lyrics input
in a lyric block. So far so good. But now I have several stanza.
1) This is my first text
2) This-is my se -- cond text
Were ofcourse the
I have defined this function in an include.ly file
MyMarkup = {
\markup
\override #'(adjust-x-pos . 1.0)
\override #'(adjust-length . 1.5)
}
I have found the explanation for non-static substitution in the
documentation.
rgument in position 1: (# . #f)
Afgesloten met returncode 1.
-- Origineel bericht --
Van: "E Appeldoorn"
Aan: "Andrew Bernard"
Verzonden: 20-4-2019 12:16:36
Onderwerp: Re[2]: Multi non static substition
Andrew,
I will upgrade. As to leaving out the markup tex
23 matches
Mail list logo
