Hi Mark,
Am 27.12.23 um 01:54 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek:
Knute,
In the original the first beat of the second measure is three against
2. The 5 against 3 does not start until the second beat.
Unfortunately, that can't be true, as with this interpretation, the
measure is over-full. Rather,
Hi Knute, hi Mark,
here's an example of what I mean. The "cheating" system should create
what the original engraving suggests, even if it's wrong mathematically.
I didn't check the difference in MIDI; of course the "conductor" part
(consisting of eigths throughout) shows a significant differen
Hi Robert,
I'm trying to make an example showing mordent symbols with text
labels. I want the note positions spaced so that the text is all on
one line, with notes placed as needed to fit around it.
The easiest way I can think of doing that would be to put manually
sized 'gap fillers' between t
Hi Stanton,
I’m setting various short organ pieces from an old Peters edition,
mostly to prevent my aging brain from forgetting…
One piece is in 8/4 time -the first measure has a whole note and 2
half notes. However, the time signature as printed is the cut time
symbol. How can I reproduce t
Hi Matthew,
Am 12.01.24 um 00:29 schrieb msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca:
You need to remember lilypond thinks in terms of pitch, not note names. Unlike
some (most?) other music software. So "\transpose g e" says "transpose EVERY
note up A TONE".
I'm not sure it's quite right to say that Lilypond thin
Hi Raphael,
Am 12.01.24 um 13:32 schrieb Raphael Mankin:
I agree that 0 as a denominator would seem to indicate an infinite
duration, and allow the rest of your argument. However <> still seems
unintuitive.
I agree that <> isn't obvious. But in a complex language like LilyPond,
there's alway
Hi Werner, hi Pierre-Luc,
Am 19.01.24 um 08:43 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
Try this with and without the \new Voice commented.
\version "2.25.12"
\language "english"
\score {
%\new Voice
<<
{bf bqf bf}
{g gqs g}
>>
\layout {}
\midi {}
}
Obviously you would need to listen
Hi Ben, hi Greg,
thanks for bringing this up - in fact I started this morning to dig up
my old work, prompted by Greg's question.
It seems I only developed the functions a but further back then
(unfortunately I don't have time at the moment to look into it in
detail) - the difference seems to be
