Trevor Baca wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> You can set #'line-break-system-details alignment-offsets independently and
> score-globally.
>
> For example:
>
>
> %%% BEGIN %%%
>
> \version "2.11.34"
>
> \layout {
>\context {
> \Score
> \override NonMusicalPaperColumn
> #'line-break-sy
throughout the score.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Marcus Macauley
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OnionRingOfDoom wrote:
Like the subject says, is there any way to reposition the \tempo mark?
I'd
love to be able to move it a bit to the left.
First, here's the fish:
\once \override Score.MetronomeMark #'X-offset = #-2
right before your first tempo mark to move it 2 spaces to the left. T
Catalin Francu wrote:
Every now and then, lyrics will collide with barlines.
...
Ideally, I'd like a way to tell Lilypond "I want at least two mm of
space between barlines and text".
Hi Catalin,
This doesn't quite address your question/gripe, but for what it's worth,
if a piece of regular
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Marcus Macauley schreef:
I'm trying to figure out how to include a Lilypond \transpose function
within a Scheme function. I'm not even sure if it makes sense to do
try (ly:music-transpose )
Wow, there it is, right in front of my nose. I actually se
Whoops. I didn't see that Rick had already responded.
Marcus
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Julian Peterson wrote:
I seem to be unable to parenthesize notes using the method explained in
the manual. Even this simple example fails:
{c d \parenthesize e f g}
Am I misunderstanding that the output of the above should include a
parenthesized e ?
I'm not sure why, but \parenthesize
I'm trying to figure out how to include a Lilypond \transpose function
within a Scheme function. I'm not even sure if it makes sense to do that,
but I haven't thought of a better way. Here's an example of what I'm
trying to do:
overtones = #(define-music-function (parser location numbers fu
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
In order to make Lilypond think an object has no horizontal or vertical
size, respectively, use
\once \override ObjectName #'X-extent = #'(0 . 0)
or
\once \override ObjectName #'Y-extent = #'(0 . 0),
where the \once is optional (as always) and ObjectName is
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
In order to make Lilypond think an object has no horizontal or vertical
size, respectively, use
\once \override ObjectName #'X-extent = #'(0 . 0)
or
\once \override ObjectName #'Y-extent = #'(0 . 0),
where the \once is optional (as always) and ObjectName i
The partial beams that you get with, e.g., a dotted rhythm: Is it possible
to reduce the length of such beamlets?
I think Lilypond's default minimum length is a bit too long, especially
for tightly-spaced music, but I haven't been able to find a way to change
it.
Marcus
Is it possible to make an object (e.g., a text markup) not take up any
vertical space?
I've been using Mats' tip for inserting extra vertical space, to good
effect, e.g. (customized):
pushup = #(define-music-function (parser location padding) (number?)
#{
s1*0^\marku
Eduardo Vieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know why this e-mail didn't make it to the Lilypond list, but,
anyhow, have you ever checked the program FOMUS
(http://common-lisp.net/project/fomus/doc/)? If you think of
algorithimic composition and working with Lisp and Scheme, that might
Either I've found a bug, or (more likely) I don't understand how variables
are passed between Lilypond and Scheme.
Below is an example, where a #(define-music-function...) block receives a
variable, stringone. That variable seems to be accessible (i.e. bound, if
I have my terminology straig
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
"Marcus Macauley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I see that there are basically two ways to make notes (music) from
within a Scheme block. As far as I can tell, one way is powerful but
cumbersome, and the other way is simple but not very powerful.
Stephen Torri wrote:
Below is my attempt at setting the next-padding value to 0 in a score so
that the individual measure lines are moving closer to each other. With
the annotate-spacing set to true I don't see next-padding changing to
zero.
What is the proper way to set next-padding?
Stephen
I see that there are basically two ways to make notes (music) from within
a Scheme block. As far as I can tell, one way is powerful but cumbersome,
and the other way is simple but not very powerful. I'm hoping maybe
there's a third way that I haven't discovered yet, or that the second way
i
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Quoting Marcus Macauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
mypitch = #0
#(define mypitch 0)
One of them is enough!
That's why I said I "put one of these lines at the beginning of the file".
When I got the error, I tried defining the variable in Scheme
I've read in the Lilypond documentation chapter 11, "Interfaces for
programmers", Appendix B, "Scheme tutorial", and the beginning of the
Scheme manual at:
http://www.swiss.ai.mit.edu/ftpdir/scheme-reports/r5rs-html/r5rs_toc.html
But I'm stuck on a simple problem which probably has a simple a
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
If you can isolate the problem, please send a bug report,
a segmentation fault is always a serious bug!
OK, I posted a bug report to bug-lilypond.
(The problem, in short, was that \addquote couldn't handle a \new Voice.
The documentation mentions this limitation, but sa
Now I see that the reason lilypond doesn't "notice" the changes in my file
is because it has a "Segmentation fault", but the Console in jEdit doesn't
tell me that. Running lilypond from the command line does.
And Lilypond still works fine on my other files. So presumably something
went wron
I'm using Lilypond 2.9.17 on Gentoo Linux, with jEdit 4.3pre6 and
LilypondTool 2.8.
Sometimes when I make a change or a few changes to the score (and save the
file, of course) and then run Lilypond again (from within jEdit, using
LilypondTool), it doesn't notice my changes, and simply outpu
I know this has been asked before, but I haven't found an answer:
Is there a way to automatically make all beams flat, or to automatically
make a certain beam flat?
Searching the documentation and lilypond-user, I found two methods,
neither of them sufficient.
The first method,
\overri
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
In the meantime, you can use
\once \override DynamicLineSpanner #'padding = #6
which is what I *always* use anyway! =)
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The explanation may be something similar as the explanation in the
section on "Text Markup" on why \left-align doesn't
The documentation page for Hairpin --
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.9/Documentation/user/lilypond-internals/Hairpin.html
-- lists Y-offset as one of the standard settings. It also says that
Hairpin supports grob-interface, and the grob-interface page --
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.9/Documentation/u
Mats,
If you search the index of the manual for "transparent objects",
"removing objects",
"hiding objects" or "invisible objects" you will find a link to some
more information
on the "transparent" property in the manual.
Thanks. I don't know how I missed that before.
\once \override St
Mats,
I wrote:
I'm trying to hide the first time signature, but display any which come
later. So here's a snippet:
\version "2.9.17"
{
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'break-visibility = ##(#f #f #f)
\time 4/4 c'1 \time 3/4 c'2.
}
The tweak is based on this page:
http://lilypond.org/doc
Hi Kieren,
I don't claim it's necessarily "better", but another way
[to hide the initial time signature but not subsequent ones]
would be
\version "2.9.17"
{
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
\time 4/4 c'1 \time 3/4 c'2.
}
Indeed, that works too. But where is
I'm trying to hide the first time signature, but display any which come
later. So here's a snippet:
\version "2.9.17"
{
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'break-visibility = ##(#f #f #f)
\time 4/4 c'1 \time 3/4 c'2.
}
The tweak is based on this page:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.9/Documentati
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:39:09 -0400, Kieren MacMillan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Marcus:
Just a quick suggestion. Why not let a GrandStaff have an instrumentName
(and a shortInstrumentName), just like a Staff and a PianoStaff already
do?
Just in case you don't know, you can always add
Hi,
Just a quick suggestion. Why not let a GrandStaff have an instrumentName
(and a shortInstrumentName), just like a Staff and a PianoStaff already do?
Instrument names could even be allowed for a ChoirStaff or a StaffGroup,
though I imagine the need to use it in those cases would be less
Markus: That's a way to manually suppress accidentals after a line break;
thanks. But I need a way to do it automatically.
> Is the example in "Section 9.3.7: Difficult Tweaks" of any help?
Kieren: That looks like it might be helpful, but I don't understand the syntax
well enough to adapt the
Hello,
Currently, if a note with an accidental is tied over a line break, the
accidental is repeated on the new line. Is there any way to turn off this
behavior?
I looked in the manual; "9.1.1 Automatic accidentals" would seem to be the
relevant section, but it doesn't say anything about tied
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Quoting Marcus Macauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
As an alternative to the second method -- and a perhaps more
conventional one, recommended by Kurt Stone -- niente can be notated
not with the dynamic letter "n" but with the italic "n." (this ti
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:27:24 -0800, Trevor Bača"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 3/16/06, Marcus Macauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another way of notating this, which I prefer, but also I think needs to
be
implemented, is to follow the decresc. (or precede the cres
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:29:43 -0800, Trevor Bača"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 3/16/06, Arno Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
dear list,
for a contemporary music score i need hairpin having a circles around
their tip, indicating cresc./descresc. from/into silence.
what is the easiest way
that typing "gs --version" at a command prompt displays
"8.15", while typing "ghostscript --version" displays "7.07". I suppose I
could make symbolic links in the /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin directories to
choose which version I wanted to use, but now that it's at least working I
feel more like leaving it alone!
Marcus Macauley
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Scott/others,
I am having the same problem. I'm running the latest version of Gentoo
(2004.3-r1, kernel 2.6.9), and have tried compiling each version of
ec-fonts-mtraced, using "make" or "make all install", and it generates
the same error every time (as Scott copied below).
Actually, I thought
38 matches
Mail list logo
