Re: ghostscript-8.70-6 broke my lilypond, no more PDF

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:54:24PM -0500, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: > > Could you try > > to run ghostscript manually to convert it to pdf (but omit the `-q' > > flag)? Like, just run > > > > gs -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00 \ > >-dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAU

Re: ghostscript-8.70-6 broke my lilypond, no more PDF

Hi, On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:59:17PM -0500, ivan.k.kuznet...@gmail.com wrote: > I ran the CentOS recommended updates and I updated from > ghostscript-8.15.2-9.12 to ghostscript-8.70-6. > > Since that time, lilypond no longer works for me in that > lilypond .ps files but no longer produces .pdf

Any LilyPond users on OpenBSD?

Hi, if anyone of you is using LilyPond on OpenBSD and is also willing to test unstable LilyPond releases in the future (i.e. after 2.14 had been released), please let me know. If there are enough users (say, more than 1), I'll consider maintaining two versions of official LilyPond packages for Ope

Re: lilypond-book "too many open files"

On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 08:08:11AM -0500, Victor Eijkhout wrote: > > In which version > > does this happen, 2.12 or 2.13? > > Using 2.12.3. Then increasing your file descriptor limits (as a workaround) is the weapon of choice. The fd leaks are probably fixed in 2.13. (I can re-check this by bu

Re: lilypond-book "too many open files"

On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 03:15:07AM -0500, Victor Eijkhout wrote: > Running lilypond-book generates over 2000 pdf files. And then > something says "too many open files". > > Is there a way around that? As a workaround, increase your file descriptor limit (for examepl, ulimit -n 3000). But be awa

Re: pdf creation and memory management.

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 07:44:16AM +1100, Nick Payne wrote: > Given how cheap RAM is these days (around $10/Gb), it sounds as though > it would be worth your while doubling or quadrupling the RAM to > eliminate the swapping to disk. `RAM/Disk is cheap' is the favorite excuse of lame developers.

[Haskell] Re: List-email Suggestion

On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:10:59PM -0700, David Rogers wrote: > I really only see two requests for change, which pop up again and again; > those are of course the two recently discussed - making the list the > default reply-to address, and prefixing the subject line. Graham already said that this

Re: List-email Suggestion

On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 01:52:54PM -0400, PMA wrote: > Would it be feasible to prepend "[Lilypond]" to the forum's email > Subject line? > Much of my other mail arrives this way -- like that from "[Csnd]" and > "[LAU]". > Does wonders for auto-filing. The list is already configured to be complia

FW: [TeX-Music] WIMA has been restored on a new server

FYI (since some of you worried about the Werner Icking Music Archive): - Forwarded message from Christian Mondrup - Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:31:04 +0100 From: Christian Mondrup Subject: [TeX-Music] WIMA has been restored on a new server Dear all. This afternoon the restore of WIMA on

Re: Werner Icking Music Archive

On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 05:11:06PM +, James Lowe wrote: > Which lists would these be? At least this one: TeX-Music Ciao, Kili -- ``stastic'' is a fantastic typo. -- Miod Vallat ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-us

Re: Werner Icking Music Archive

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 08:33:22AM -0600, M.E. wrote: > Some news I thought to share here. The Werner Icking Music Archive > has closed its doors (for good?). > > Too much traffic. http://www.daimi.au.dk/~reccmo/usage/ I think there're some ongoing

Re: pid leakage in LilyPond

On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:40:11PM +, Graham Percival wrote: > >> When I enter music, I incrementally compile it as I go. > >> I do my work on a Mac running OS 10.4. There are a fixed number of > >> pids available for all the programs running on the Mac. > > > Excuse my ignorance, but what

Re: not able to install lil ypond 2.12.2after ¨invalid?conversion ¨ on Ububtu 9.10

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:42:10PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > Second, if you really want to compile for some reason, compile > > 2.12.3, which should include that fix. > > 2.12.3 does indeed include the fix in lily/relocate.cc. This may help, but IMHO Ubuntu ships wrong headers or whatever

Re: not able to install lil ypond 2.12.2after ¨ invalid conversion ¨ on Ububtu 9.10

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 01:35:36PM +, Tom Haring wrote: > g++ -c -Woverloaded-virtual -I/usr/include/python2.6 -I/usr/ > include/python2.6 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -fwrapv -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNDEBUG - > I./include -I./out -I../flower/include -I../flower/./out -I../flower/include > - > O2 -fin

Re: anybody know apache? (dir structure of docs)

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:34:19PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > > Can't we have the directory structure internally with /web/ , > > > /download/ what have you, and use some serverside URL rewriting to > > > make translate > > > > > > /foo/ > > > > > > into > > > > > > /web/foo/ [...] > Ye

Re: lilypond via web interface: security considerations

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:41:36AM +0100, Alex wrote: > Yeah, I've just been looking at safe-lily.scm which appears to filter > any given module against the safe funcs > Also I saw the bit that bans include files when in safe mode. > So, the CPU style DoS attack aside, do the above two cover a

Re: building lilypond from freebsd ports

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 03:44:08PM -0700, Glen Hein wrote: > > - is this reproducable, i.e. does it always crash in ghostscript, and at > > the same file? > The problem is reproducible. It fails on the same file every time. I had > been building using csh, so as a WAG, I tried bash. The bash ulimi

Re: building lilypond from freebsd ports

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 01:03:00PM -0700, Glen Hein wrote: > I sent this question to the freebsd port maintainer, but I also wanted to > ask this list. I'm trying to build lilypond from the free port > (print/lilypond) and I'm getting a seg fault from Ghostscript. I was > wondering if anybody has s

Re: You can support software freedom in 2008!

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:23:43PM +, Free Software Foundation wrote: > From: Free Software Foundation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] > Dear free software supporter, > > Today we're stepping up our year-end fundraiser to support our 2008 > campaign goals for software freedom

Re: GDP for kids :)

On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:11:47PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > This week's new episodes: [...] > Hope you guys will like it! Yup. I love it, and I've some silly ideas regarding Lily, Clippy and Dust Puppy in my mind, to add more "action" ;-) (If you don't know about Dust Puppy and Clippy,

Re: OpenBSD testers needed for LilyPond 2.10.23

On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 12:53:55AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=117940219518892&w=2 > > > > Please send any comments and test reports back to me (PM, i.e. > > offlist). Note that this port is a little zombie wrt guile (still > > at 1.6) -- i didn't notice

OpenBSD testers needed for LilyPond 2.10.23

Hi, I don't know wether there are more people than just Matt Jibson and me running LilyPond on OpenBSD, but just in case *you* do (and aren't reading [EMAIL PROTECTED]), please give this a try: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=117940219518892&w=2 Please send any comments and test reports back

Re: Manual engraving video

On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 08:59:39PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Here the German version, with a much better resolution: > > http://www.henle.de/video/vollversion/Notenstich_D.wmv Note that you can't directly fetch this, since they check the referer. But you can find it from Henle's "download"

Re: Lilypond-2.8.7: Compile failure

On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 10:13:29PM +0200, Ebrahim Mayat wrote: > checking for guile... guile > checking for guile... /usr/local/bin/guile Which version of guile are you running. IIRC, it should be at least 1.6 (i'm running mostly fine here on OpenBSD with guile-1.6.7). > checking makeinfo version

Re: Why is the installer file so big?

On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 08:26:06PM +, Davide Castellone wrote: > Why doesn't the Lilypond installer seem to be compressed? With > my very slow 56k Internet connection I find the source-tarball > (about 2.5 MB) more easy to download than the installer for > GNU/Linux (>11 MB), but the sources mu

Re: Pronunciation of the author's names

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:03:57PM -0300, Eduardo Vieira wrote: > How do you pronounce Nienhuys? And Jan Nieuwenhuizen? Hah! We need a SillySounds directory ;-) Ciao, Kili ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.

Re: GNU clarification

On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:25:41PM -0200, Pedro Kröger wrote: > > 1. is this a violation of the GNU? > > I believe you mean the GPL? no, it's not a violation. You can do > whatever you want with the output lilypond generates. The license > applies to the source code of the program itself (i.e. the

Re: TEMPO CHANGE WITH NO METRONOME MARKING PRINTED ?

On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 12:23:35PM +0100, MX wrote: > Is it possible to change the tempo within a piece (with \tempo 4 = 120 > for example) with an effect to the the midi output BUT with NO > metronome marking printed in the layout output ? In addition to the other suggestions, if you don't wa

Re: Different version for FreeBSD

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:33:16PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > If he has some experience of compiling programs, it shouldn't > be that hard to simply take the source code package of version > 2.4.5 from www.lilypond.org, carefully read INSTALL.txt to find > out what other programs have to be upg

Re: Installation Problems

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:37:45AM +0100, Maurits Lamers wrote: > Maybe then it would be an idea that the mailing list manager sets the > reply-to header to [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Ciao, Kili ___ lilyp

Re: NEW: bundled OpenBSD ports for LilyPond 2.4.5

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:23:42PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just in case: I'd like to ask you to *not* include the ports@ list in replies. Thanks, Kili ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.

NEW: bundled OpenBSD ports for LilyPond 2.4.5

Hi! Spoiler for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please get this as FYI. I know most of you have much more important things to do now (testing). But just in case someone has too much spare time, and is interested in electronic music typesetting (by hobby or professional), I wanted to let you know. S

Re: Font problem in 2.4.5

On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:51:50AM -0800, Doug Asherman wrote: > I compiled 2.4.5 from the tarball -- I'm trying to use it with tetex-3.0 > under Linux. I've read the compilation instructions, and aside from a > small problem with espgs, everything seemed to go well. For the OpenBSD port (to be an

Re: Issue upgrading from 2.2 to 2.4

On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 08:09:00PM -0700, Aaron Dalton wrote: > I run Lilypond under WinXP and Cygwin. I had typeset a number of > William Byrd pieces under Lilypond 2.2 and have now upgraded to 2.4. > Now my pieces don't compile. The top of my source file is as follows: [...] Have a look at c

Polyphonic alternating beams with cross-voice slurs

Hi, finally beeing back to LilyPond after nearly a year, I'm restarting at a really weird engraving problem. Erik Sandberg warned be, and he was right. This is what I want: http://dead-parrot.de/chaconne.gif or, if you prefer PDF: http://dead-parrot.de/chaconne.pdf The alternating beams aren't

Re: getting Lily/mftrace on MacOSX

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:03:02AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > So mftrace depends on tetex-dev *or* system-tetex. On a virgin fink > installation, doing fink install mftrace (or rather fink install > lilypond), you'll get conflicts. > > No idea how to fix this, since I d

Re: getting Lily/mftrace on MacOSX

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:33:48PM -0800, David Rogers wrote: > >>>`fink install lilypond-devel' fails, for mftrace > >>>depends on tetex-dev (avaliable version: 2.0.2), which conflicts with > >>>libkpathsea4 (3.0). [...] > >I've similar problems. > After editing the conf file, did you run "fink se

Re: getting Lily/mftrace on MacOSX

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:23:03PM -0800, David Rogers wrote: > >`fink install lilypond-devel' fails, for mftrace > >depends on tetex-dev (avaliable version: 2.0.2), which conflicts with > >libkpathsea4 (3.0). [...] I've similar problems. > 2. To accomplish the same thing manually, edit /sw/etc/f

Re: OpenBSD port - half success

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:24:32PM -0700, Matt Jibson wrote: > I have started a port for lilypond onto OpenBSD. Currently everything > builds and installs. The output is only half working, though. As an example: [...] > In addition to lilypond, I also had to create ports to autotrace, > ec-fonts-

[no subject]

Test ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: german mailinglist for lilypond?

On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:17:48PM +, Anthony W. Youngman wrote: > [...] Why shouldn't people post to the mailing > list in other languages if their English isn't good enough? It just > means that they are going to get less help because fewer people will > understand the question :-) That c

Re: root / user question

On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 03:56:40PM +0200, Thomas Scharkowski wrote: > When I run lilypond 2.2.4 as user I get some console messages in > german and some english. I do not like this, and jEdit with lilytool > does not like it either. > When I run lilypond as root everything is in english. > Can an

[ot] making patches (was: abc2ly and beams)

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 08:14:19PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Next time, please send a unified diff, see > http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/ Small hint on diffing: I typically have two directories: project (the original sources), and project.local (a copy, probably locally modifi

Re: Is method of using LilyPond compatible with creativity?

On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 12:02:43AM +1000, Michael Edwards wrote: > LilyPond is (I've learned in the last week or so) based on text > input, and seems rather similar to computer programming (unless > I've read people's comments wrongly). Well, most of what you see that looks like programming are tw

Simulating parametrized `macros' for single context overrides

Hi all, earlier this day, Roland did ask me (per PM) a question leading to an IMHO very usable little helper. Ronald wanted some feature like the following: - At top level, define textshift = \once\override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(#1 . #2) - Within music expressions, use \textshi

Re: WELCOME to cygwin-announce@cygwin.com

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 08:30:56PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Acknowledgment: I have added the address > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > to the cygwin-announce mailing list. I suggest to immediately blacklist all mails from cygwin.com. They've autosubsription (the first acknowledge mail from c

[slightly OT] Re: Basic questions about LilyPond.

On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:35:21PM -0700, Hans Forbrich wrote: > I personally think many people go about the evaluation totally backwards. > They first ask 'how easy is it to get started'. Well, that seems to be symptomatic for most software today, even in professional software development dep

Re: variable stave distances in piano-staves

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 08:27:28PM +0200, Roland Goretzki wrote: > > Since this is rather unstable (one changed linebreak after editing > > and you're in the wrong staff) I recommend to do that finetuning after > > everything else has been typed in. > > Unstable?: > I think, only if I DID everythi

Re: variable stave distances in piano-staves

On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 10:55:37PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > Under "Piano music" -> BUGS I found it, and it is quite complicated, but > > it works. :) [...] > > Can You tell me, wether it is possible or not to determine more than one > > line to ch

Re: Documentation about Vim mode

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:58:48PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > I send this to lilypond-user since some other users may also have > forgotten to apply recent patches to Vim and still have Vim 6.2.0 ;-) Now, with Vim 6.2.424, I'd to change ftdetect/lilypond.vim to au! BufNewF

Documentation about Vim mode

Hi, I think the note on Vim 6.2 in the documentation (INSTALL.html) should be changed to Vim 6.2.073. At least for 6.2.0, I had to eidt ~/.vim/filetype.vim, and the ftdetect mechanism is mentioned in Vim patch 6.2.073. I send this to lilypond-user since some other users may also have forgotten to

Re: variable stave distances in piano-staves

On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 07:23:35PM +0200, Roland Goretzki wrote: > Under "Piano music" -> BUGS I found it, and it is quite complicated, but > it works. :) > > But I couldn't figure out, how to change the distance in more than one > line, it was hard enough for me to find, how to determine THE ONE

Dynamics in parentheses

Hi, is there a clean way to set dynamics (\f, \p, \mf, ...) in parentheses while keeping the original semantics? \markup works, but then the Dynamic_performer won't see it. That's bad when you're creating MIDI files for acustic proof "reading". I'm using LilyPond 2.1.35. Ciao, Kili ___

revert-auto-beam-setting

On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:46:49PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > WELL RECEIVED THANK YOU .WE WILL REVERT SOON ^^ The above quote isn't really meaningfull at all, but one word remembered me a bug (or misdocumentetation) in LilyPond :-) I've problems usin

Why those amusing font names?

Hi, I poked the sources and the documenation, but I didn't find what causes me sleepless nights :-) Why are the fonts used by LilyPond named "feta" and "parmesan"? Ciao, Kili ps: *grumbel*, after writing this mail, I'm a little bit hungry. Probably I should get some pasta. ___

Re: quoted text in lyric

On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:04:55AM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > The LaTeX syntax for a double quote is ''quoted text``, at least Shouldn't it be ``quoted text''? Ciao, Kili ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org

Re: Beamgroups (simplifying \set stem.*BeamCount=#1)

On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:40:59PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > So you want to have subdivideBeams, but with subdivisions on 8th > notes? Yes. (For some unknown reasons, I didn't even see that there's a property subdivisions) Ciao, Kili __

Beamgroups (simplifying \set stem.*BeamCount=#1)

Hi, is there any chance to extend auto beaming to support "beam groups" as in #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4) d e f \set stemRightBeamCount=#1 e \set stemLeftBeamCount=#1 d f e d f-> e d \set stemRightBeamCount=#1 f \set stemLeftBeamCount=#1 e d f e d g \s

Re: Beamgroups (simplifying \set stem.*BeamCount=#1)

On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:56:47PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > is there any chance to extend auto beaming to support "beam groups" as in > > #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4) > d e f \set stemRightBeamCount=#1 e [...] Sorry, copy'n

Re: Poly meter HowTo?

On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 12:34:02PM -0500, Steve Shorter wrote: > I need to do multiple meters in different clefts > simultaneosly like this > [...] Theoretically, the trick mentioned in "polymetric-differing-notes.ly" and "polymetric.ly" on the "Tips and Tricks" page, should help. For the

Re: OT: How to become a mutopia-writer

On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 11:45:02PM +0100, Roland Goretzki wrote: > > I wouldn't know without asking Henle (the holder of the copyright > > right?), who could probably answer about any pieces of theirs you ask > > about. > In the mailing from Kilian this seems more easy, ^^

Re: OT: How to become a mutopia-writer

Hi, On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 06:09:17PM +0100, Roland Goretzki wrote: > I want to typeset the studies op. 10 and op. 25 from F. Chopin with > lilypond for the mutopia-project. > > (And in the future, some Sonatas from Beethoven for piano, too.) [...] > 1. G. Henle > 2. Schott > 3. Wilh

Re: coding problem with triplets

Hi, On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 10:58:20PM -0800, chip wrote: > I am trying to get a measure like this - > 8thRest 8thNote 8thNote 8thNote 4Note triplet8thNotes > using this code > r8 a' csharp'' e'' csharp''4 \times 4/3 {gsharp''8[ gsharp'' gsharp'']} Use \times 2/3. \times $n/$m means "$m in the ti

[OT] Re: question: volta + dynamics

[Little bit offtopic] On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 09:40:07AM -0500, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > [...] How could fp or pf mean the same thing on guitar > or piano as it does on arci or winds? I'v even seen a piano sheet with a crescendo on a single half note chord, at tempo allegretto. Technically,

Tempo changes for MIDI output.

Hi, I want tempo changes to affect MIDI output only, i.e. there should be no metronome marks in the output. Just removing the Metronome_mark_engraver works: \paper { \translator { \ScoreContext \remove Metronome_mark_engraver } } However, now I get annoying warnings:

PianoStaffs, polyphonic music and staff changes

Hi, the standard way to write piano music seems to put something like this in the score block: \context PianoStaff << \context Staff = treble { \trebleNotes } \context Staff = bass { \bassNotes } >> However, for my first "masterpiece" (still the chaconne), th

Re: attachment filtering

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:42:37PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > in response to rising complaints and because of being fed up with it, > Jan and I have decided to reject application/octet-stream attachments > from lilypond-user and bug-lilypond. I still get more than 90% junk from the mailingli

Re: [ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department)

On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:36:58AM -0500, Nick Busigin wrote: > > > a) make the list closed post (only subscribed members may post to the list), > > > b) if that worms come from a subscribed member, kick that member, > > > c) reject every mail containing attachments other than .ly or .png. > > > >

[ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department)

On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:18:51PM +0100, Vally an Leon wrote: > Stop that nonsense! Complaining about every single worm mail that's distributed on the mailing list isn't really helpfull. Indeed, it doubles the amount of useless mails. For that worm problem: IMHO, the list owners should ASAP a)

Re: non-relative relative mode?

On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:54:16PM +0100, Erik Sandberg wrote: > I can however imagine that some things can be simpler to typeset with > absolute mode, e.g. if there is a lot of chords and not so much melodic > lines. This can be the case in some piano music. Well, I've indeed some problems using

Re: Making Large-Print Music

On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 08:18:34PM -0500, Ruven Gottlieb wrote: > ...If you want to override this, use a |\translator| block as follows: > > \translator { > \PianoStaffContext > VerticalAlignment \override #'forced-distance = #9 > } > > ** > But I don't know wh

grace questions: sharing stems with other notes; tuning MIDI output

Hi! I've the following two questions about grace notes: 1. Given an ordinary note/chord followed by a beamed sequence of 32th grace notes, is it possible to attach the beam to the ordinary note's stem? Or, in other words, if I have something like this: c4 \grace {c32 d fis g a ...} can

Re: Changing vertical staff spacing for PianoStaff?

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:48:54AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Ah, an excercise in Lily Hacking! Tested on lily .24 > > > \header > { > > texidoc = "It is possible to have different staff distances across > piano systems, but it requires some advanced magic. Kids don't try this at home. [.

Re: Changing vertical staff spacing for PianoStaff?

On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 06:20:48PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > is it possible to temporarily extend the vertical alignment of > > piano staffs? [...] > > You can use GrandStaff for this purpose. However, in that case, you > cannot use cross-staff beams or slurs. Unfortunately, I need both:

Changing vertical staff spacing for PianoStaff?

Hi, is it possible to temporarily extend the vertical alignment of piano staffs? I've the problem that I need more space for some parts only. Enlarging the distance for the whole piece would just look ugly. Would it even be possible to let LilyPond automatically enlarge the distance to avoid col

Breitkopf & Haertel again / extra-X-extent

Hi, still working on that Bach/Busoni piece, I again tried to get the b&h style collision handling. The default behaviour of LilyPond can be seen in bh-default.png, generated from bh-default.ly. My first solution to get an output closer to the b&h edition was bh-wide.png, generated from bh-wide.

Re: missing dots with merge-differently-dotted

On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 08:16:58PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Unfortunately, I didn't find the time to scan that part of B&H edition. If [...] Ha! I finally did what an more intelligent beeing would have done first: open collated-files.html and search for `shift'. Attache

Re: missing dots with merge-differently-dotted

On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 09:59:29AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > As far as I can see, LilyPond does the same as B& H most of the time. Only > > that critical situation in my example is handled differently. > > How? By putting the stem-down, dotted eight *right* of the stem-up chord. I try a

Re: missing dots with merge-differently-dotted

On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 01:50:10PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > \version "2.1.15" > > \score { > > \notes \relative c { > > \time 1/4 > > \key d \minor > > \clef bass > > << 4 \\ {g'8. bes16} >> > > } > > \paper {} > > } > > Does B&H arrange the heads in the same way a

Re: missing dots with merge-differently-dotted

Hi Donald. On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 04:54:48AM +0100, donald_j_axel wrote: > > This will misplace the dotted g (stem-down) left of the chord > > (stem-up), with the dot running straight into the chord. Breitkopf & > > Härtel put it right of the chord. > > I have made some experiments (Busoni2.png)

Re: missing dots with merge-differently-dotted

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:14:32PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > You found a bug. The dot-collision/merging code was rewritten in 2.1. > It turned out that merging removed any dots were removed from the > lower nothead: [...] > Fixed in CVS. HEAD works fine for me. However, I just ran into th

missing dots with merge-differently-dotted

Hi, rather new to LilyPond and keen to experiment, I started to write Busonis famous piano transcription of Bachs chaconne in d minor from bwv 1004. Using the printout of Breitkopf & Härtel, I'm currently stuck on the following: \version "2.1.15" \score { \notes \relative c' { \property Sta