2015-05-21 13:54 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca>:
> > May I ask why you’re not using Lilypond’s built-in (and generallly > excellent) voice-handling? e.g. In the modified snippet (below), I’m using > \voiceOne, \voiceTwo, etc., which eliminates the need for \stemUp, > \tieDown, etc., and appears (to my eye) to eliminate all note collisions. > Simply because, I'm learning Lilypond since only a few days. Your solution avoids the collision at the third measure, but introduces an horizontal shift at the fourth measure, which I'd like to prevent. Is it possible? > > p.s. Also note that I abstracted your note code from your score code — it > is so much easier to read and debug this way, in my opinion, and it keeps > the score block as clean and simple as possible. > Thank you very much for your advice. As a beginner, where can I learn how to write a better code? Olivier
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
