RE: Merging rests in single-staff polyphony

2004-12-06 Thread P Scott Horne
-Original Message- From: Ruud van Silfhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 6 décembre 2004 14:31 To: Lilypond user Cc: P Scott Horne; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fw: Merging rests in single-staff polyphony Hi, I think this question should be posted on the lilypond user list

Bug in spacing of lyrics in polyphonic context

2004-09-14 Thread P Scott Horne
In the old days of version 1.6.8, we wrote polyphony this way: {c d e}\\{e f g} Now the notation is {c d e}\\{e f g} There seems to be a bug in the engraving of lyrics set against a staff that breaks into polyphony with the new notation of double chevrons. In version 1.6.8,

RE: LilyPond error: ps2pdf not found

2004-09-06 Thread P Scott Horne
with installation? Again, this is with Lilypond 2.2.5 for Windows. Scott Horne -Original Message- From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 6 septembre 2004 06:01 To: P Scott Horne Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LilyPond error: ps2pdf not found Just rerun setup.exe once

LilyPond error: ps2pdf not found

2004-09-05 Thread P Scott Horne
I have just installed the latest version of LilyPond for Windows from your Web site. When I tried to run the test ('test.ly'), I got an error message: ps2pdf not found. How can I obtain and install this missing utility? For your reference, I have attached a copy of the log file. Thank you in

RE: Split stem for different pitches on same staff level

2003-06-30 Thread P Scott Horne
David Raleigh Arnold wrote: On Sunday 29 June 2003 05:18 am, P Scott Horne wrote: In the key of D-flat major, I wrote d,16 bes' a' aes d, bes' and got for the middle chord two noteheads side by side, preceded by a natural sign with a flat sign superimposed. Aside the obvious

Split stem for different pitches on same staff level

2003-06-29 Thread P Scott Horne
In the key of D-flat major, I wrote d,16 bes' a' aes d, bes' and got for the middle chord two noteheads side by side, preceded by a natural sign with a flat sign superimposed. Aside the obvious error (presumably a bug) of superimposing accidentals, this notation is incorrect. Standard