Hi
I'm wanting to write some globally accessible scheme functions / procedures
(defines) for my lilypond project but the documentation on such seems a bit
limited. I.e. Do \header, \page and other contexts introduce new variable
scopes (assuming yes here)? If so, how can scheme functions and va
If I use the following to load a scheme module into a lilypond script file I
can use any of the public interfaces in this current file.
#(load "init/credits.scm")
#(use-modules (init credits)) %get access to the public defines in credits.scm
#(ech 'set-song-number "66.") % ech is a public defin
I can offer.
Cheers
Reverend Simon Mackenzie
Lutheran Church of Australia [[ http://www.lca.org.au/ ]]
On 27/08/2009, at 09:14, David Rogers wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:03, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
I haven't been able to figure out how to replicate the three
naturals on
this music s
The key signature assignment tells LilyPond how to display the
pitches. For exmaple; 'e' *always* means e-natural no matter what
the key signature is.
-David
Simon Mackenzie wrote:
Hi guys correct me if I am wrong.
The g minor chord has two flats Eb & Bb which need to be marked as
In response to Graham and others who have expressed frustration about
people who have failed to pickup on accidentals.
It can be very difficult for fist time novices like myself to
understand implicit information about what is a reasonably technical
musical concept.
I spent four hours last
Hi guys correct me if I am wrong.
The g minor chord has two flats Eb & Bb which need to be marked as es
and bes in Lilypond other wise the Accidental_engraver sees them as
naturals in the g minor chord, hence the natural symbol for any
unmarked E or B note in your music.
Just trying to se
For basic music theory this site seems helpful...
http://www.8notes.com/
Simon
On 24/08/2009, at 09:28, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
Hi All,
Yes by now you would have figured out I am musically challenged,
seriously musically challenged.
1) My initial task was to generate a result which would
people what to do and
teaching people what to do and why are not the same thing.
Many thanks to those who have taught me what to do and why, it is
equipping me to be a teacher of others.
Reverend Simon Mackenzie
Lutheran Church of Australia
On 23/08/2009, at 22:19, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
Hi
I guess I'm simple minded so enlighten me ;-)
Simon
On 21/08/2009, at 15:24, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 03:13:40PM +0700, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
It will be helpful not to think about the problem from the Lilypond
side
of things.
No, that will not be helpful.
Sto
hard copy of the music sheet above.Simon On 21/08/2009, at 11:52, James E. Bailey wrote: On 21.08.2009, at 04:21, Simon Mackenzie wrote:I'm lost on this one...If I place the override in the voice context I end up with the following which is nothing like what I need to achieve.Okay, I think I
g the stencil in the music. i.e., with \once
\override Staff.Accidental_engraver #'stencil = ##f
Just trying to get my head around how all this works.
On 20.08.2009, at 18:10, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
If I turn Accidental_engraver off no accidentals appear as expected
but then if leave
Simon
On 20/08/2009, at 23:04, Mark Polesky wrote:
Simon Mackenzie wrote:
I have revised my approach to the question of what constitutes
good coding style and come up with this layout for my master
music sheet files. Any comments on the following style and
layout would be appreciated
If I turn Accidental_engraver off no accidentals appear as expected
but then if leave it on I don't seem to be able to manually set
naturals with ! and exclude / turn off everything else.
Simon
On 20/08/2009, at 22:48, James E. Bailey wrote:
On 20.08.2009, at 17:39, Simon Mackenzie
I haven't been able to figure out how to replicate the three naturals
on this music sheet using Lilypond script?
Any ideas?
<>
Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I have revised my approach to the question of what constitutes good
coding style and come up with this layout for my master music sheet
files.
Any comments on the following style and layout would be appreciated.
There are separate chord and voice include files and each lyric verse
is also p
Yeah it's proving to be an interesting learning experience trying to
wrap my head around Lilypond. I feel it is like a multi-headed beast
with Scheme & Lilypond script intermingled together. It makes for an
interesting mix to get ones head around. The manuals are helpful but
there are hugh
f4 e8[ e8]( |
c2.) g'8[ b8] |
g4. c8 b4 e,8[ f8] |
g2. c8[ c8] |\break
...
f4. e8 c4 e8[( b8)] |
c2 f4 f4 |
f4. e8 c4 b8[( e8)] |
c1 | \bar "|."
}
=== End - CHORDSNOTES_061.ly ==
Cheers
Simon
On 08/08/2009, at
Ahhh!
Thank you.
Simon
On 08/08/2009, at 20:04, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Quoting Simon Mackenzie :
Ok it appears to be a scoping issue.
So I need to declare variables outside the \book scope? Is this
correct?
But if my script file is included inside a \book scope how can i
then declare
Simon
On 08/08/2009, at 05:41, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Simon Mackenzie wrote Friday, August 07, 2009 3:55 PM
Eg. What does it mean on page 34 of the Learning Tutorial when it
says...
"Variables must be defined before the main music expression."
Does this mean the \score { }
Ok it appears to be a scoping issue.
So I need to declare variables outside the \book scope? Is this correct?
But if my script file is included inside a \book scope how can i then
declare new variables inside this scope?
Simon
On 07/08/2009, at 21:55, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
Agreed!!!
Eg
Agreed!!!
Eg. What does it mean on page 34 of the Learning Tutorial when it
says...
"Variables must be defined before the main music expression."
Does this mean the \score { } or does it mean the expression in which
the declared variable is referenced?
Because I dutifully declare my vari
On 19/06/2009, at 11:21 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:08:11AM +0700, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
On 19/06/2009, at 8:37 AM, Tim McNamara wrote:
On 18.06.2009, at 16:05, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
Has any one had any success compiling Lilypond 2.12.2 on a MAC OS
X 10.5.7
On 19/06/2009, at 8:37 AM, Tim McNamara wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
On 18/06/2009, at 11:29 PM, James E. Bailey wrote:
On 18.06.2009, at 16:05, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
Hi All,
Has any one had any success compiling Lilypond 2.12.2 on a MAC OS
X 10.5.7
On 18/06/2009, at 11:29 PM, James E. Bailey wrote:
On 18.06.2009, at 16:05, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
Hi All,
Has any one had any success compiling Lilypond 2.12.2 on a MAC OS X
10.5.7 system?
Cheers
Reverend Simon Mackenzie
Lutheran Church of Australia
Nan
Thailand
I've
Hi All,
Has any one had any success compiling Lilypond 2.12.2 on a MAC OS X
10.5.7 system?
Cheers
Reverend Simon Mackenzie
Lutheran Church of Australia
Nan
Thailand
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
25 matches
Mail list logo