Re: Emacs setup

Fair enough: "it" refers to the lilypond elisp code which provides integration between emacs and lilypond and utils for editing elisp code. That code is installed by the lilypond installer. Immanuel On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 6:17 PM waterhorsemusic wrote: > What is "it?" > > It is useful to edit

Re: Emacs setup

gt; > On Sat, Jul 6, 2024, 1:09 AM Immanuel Litzroth < > immanuel.litzr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> lilypond mode is not included in emacs by default (at least not up until >> 30 prerelease). >> What is included in org mode is support for org mode lilyp

Re: Emacs setup

gt;>> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/usage/configuring-the-system-for-point-and-click >>>>> > I had to do that even though I'm not using GNOME or a DE at >>>>> > all. You don't have to use pdf-tools (although I agree with >>>>>

Re: Emacs setup

; > I had to do that even though I'm not using GNOME or a DE at >>>> > all. You don't have to use pdf-tools (although I agree with >>>> > Immanuel it is >>>> > very good and you probably want it) but I got it working in both >>>> > zathura a

Re: Emacs setup

I posted a message a while back to get point-and-click +preview working in emacs a while back. It was titled "Point an Click & emacs", it requires pdf-tools -- which you want anyway :-) greetz, i On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 9:18 AM Kenneth Flak wrote: > Thanks a lot, Ben! This seems to work very

Re: tabstaff minimumfret behaving badly

Thanks, I also found that indicating string numbers works. Immanuel On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 12:53 PM Malte Meyn wrote: > > > Am 14.07.19 um 12:42 schrieb Immanuel Litzroth: > > Am I doing something wrong? Is there a way to fix this? > > minimum-fret allows open strings b

tabstaff minimumfret behaving badly

This score gives a strange result (uses open string for the b and the e). > \version "2.19.81" \language "english" \new TabStaff { \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #3 \relative c' {} } > Am I doing something wrong? Is there a way to fix this? Immanuel tmp.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document

Bug with transpose in functions

This seems to do the wrong thing: > \version "2.19.81" testme = #(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?) #{ \transpose c c' {#music } {#music } #}) \testme g' > printing out two g'' instead of a g'' and a g' Also I

Re: Why no numbers allowed in variables?

I also miss numbers in variables and some kind of scoping for variables. Immanuel On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:45 PM Maarten Deen wrote: > Why are there no numbers allowed in variable names? I like to have some > kind of descriptive name for parts of the scores that I make in > Lilypond, and not

Re: Scheme book (p)review

Hey Urs, I'm willing to review the book. I'm a programmer with very good scheme/lisp knowledge and I've been using lilypond for a number of years. I've written some lilypond scheme functions but not that much. Let me know if I can be of help. Cheers, Immanuel On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Urs

Re: It is possible de play Snear Roll Midi with midi TAG, if yes, how ?

Midi standard does not include a snare roll. Many drum programs do include it but it's not standardized. Immanuel On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Steve Prud'Homme wrote: > Hi, I really like this website : >

Re: It is possible de play Snear Roll Midi with midi TAG, if yes, how ?

That won't sound like a roll, but like a machinegun :-) If these things aren't prerecorded in your software it's really hard to get a convincing roll. Immanuel On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:52 PM, tisimst wrote: > Steve, > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Steve

Re: My finances for working on LilyPond

All of the stuff I decided to sponsor (Ardour, GNU, Dawkins, Wikipedia, Jacob Colier...) I sponsored through Paypal. For the recipients getting 95% of the amount was still much better than getting nothing. I would still sponsor Lilypond development and have tried in the past but found it a lot

Re: Supporting my work on LilyPond financially

2) The contention was that this stuff would be easier in Sibelius. Not that you can get it right there too. Sibelius doesn't get things automatically right as well as Lilypond does, but it's usually much, much easier to correct or customize them when it doesn't give you what you want,

Re: Supporting my work on LilyPond financially

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote: On 01/12/13 09:45, David Kastrup wrote: Finale output is ugly to the degree where it is distracting readability, particularly for instrumentalists. Sibelius' corporate parent has fired its core

Re: Supporting my work on LilyPond financially

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote: On 01/12/13 14:56, immanuel litzroth wrote: Here's a nice example. That's almost certainly someone writing to full score (which has particular spacing properties) and auto-exporting to parts

Re: Question about autocompile bash script

If there were some kind of make-dep for lilypond it could even generate these dependencies automaticaly, like it happens for C (the compiler generates dependencies when passed the correct flags). This should not be too hard to brew up? Immanuel On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jacques Menu

Re: Support for Uke chords?

Here's a small example of something I started a while back -- it's unfinished but should get you going Regards, i On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Clark Milioti clark.mili...@officesystematics.com wrote: Greetings, I just discovered LilyPond. I am blown away by the concept of its

Re: Problems compiling in Ubuntu 10.04

I had the same problem, can't the configure script catch the wrong guile version? Immanuel On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:20 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: bb bblo...@arcor.de writes: generate-documentation.log ends with this message: ... ... ;;; compiling

Re: Problems compiling in Ubuntu 10.04

Indeed, I had to do that too. i On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:17 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: bb bblo...@arcor.de writes: Compiled with guile 2.0.5 deinstalled and guile 1.8.8 installed. (1.8 and 2.0 are in the repository.) make gives this: ... ranlib out/library.a || ar ts

Re: Problems compiling in Ubuntu 10.04

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:40 PM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote: clude/guile/2.0/**libguile Did you reconfigure the source tree? It is still looking for guile under 2.0. ... /usr/include/guile/2.0/libguile.h', i ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: *.mid vs *.midi

C++ has the same preprocessor as C, and the same grammar sentence symbol, and a language subset. GCC has options for invoking the preprocessor and language proper separate You can check the whole formal grammar of C++ processing on page 307 of the standard. The language proper is a term

Re: *.mid vs *.midi

Quoting Hans Aberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It is of a formal grammar, since it odes not define a sentence symbol, nor does it specify context dependencies. For the formal definition of a grammar, see books on compiler construction, for example Waite Goose, Compiler Construction. Please

Re: *.mid vs *.midi

The man page of 'gcc' has 62 occurrences of this word, the first one being: Some options control the preprocessor and others the compiler itself. Once again answering a different question. You made a direct quote from Stroustrups book. Could you tell me which page it is on instead of

Re: *.mid vs *.midi

Quoting Hans Aberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: C is composed of two languages: the preprocessor, to which #include belongs, and merely composes the files into one compile unit, and the C compiler, which processes that. So the C language itself does not have any #include directive.

Re: *.mid vs *.midi

Quoting Hans Aberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 18 May 2008, at 15:16, immanuel litzroth wrote: So the C language itself does not have any #include directive. The C language standard is available at: http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf You'll see all the preprocessing

Re: *.mid vs *.midi

Haskell does not deduce what to include. You have to explicitly import each module or no magic happens. Can't really see the big difference with #include stdio.h and import Unix. The point is I believe that you are guaranteed that what is linked is is is compatible with your declarations,

Re: You can support software freedom in 2008!

Does this kind of FSF spam really belong to the lilypond-user mailing list (and to the lilypond-devel list, where it appeared too)? Yes. I don't think so. Indeed, I consider sending campaigns to mailing lists without the mailinglist address at least in the to: or cc: headers as offensive

Lilypond on MacosX Leopard

I tried to compile lilypond with the help of macports today and I don't have much good news. 1) The guile in macports didn't seem to compile for me due to some errors related to open64 and such. A downloaded guile had the same problem but I hacked my way around that and got guile to compile. 2)

Re: Lilypond on macos Leopard

In 10.4, I have put LilyPond in /Applications/, and in my home directory, I have script created by say cat lilypond exec /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond $@ ^D chmod a+x lilypond (where ^D is control-D). Then this LilyPond script can be run. Does

Re: Lilypond on macos Leopard

In 10.4, I have put LilyPond in /Applications/, and in my home directory, I have script created by say cat lilypond exec /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond $@ ^D chmod a+x lilypond (where ^D is control-D). Then this LilyPond script can be run. Does

Lilypond on macos Leopard

Lilypond doesn't work on Leopard as it did on Tiger. I upgraded my system (install new system with keeping of settings). If I try to run the unix commandline executables I get the message /bin/bash: /Users/immanuel/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond: cannot execute binary file